Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/795
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/797
The original code used the enum value as a sentinel so it would never have
hit the empty strings at the ends of the lists.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/796
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/797
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/829
I'm quite negative on this API and the underlying "get_protocol_string()".
I think that it doesn't serve the right purpose and is not general enough to be
useful. See dev@ for more
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/824#discussion_r72732562
--- Diff: lib/atscppapi/examples/experimental/websocket/WebSocket.cc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+#include "WebSocket.hh"
+
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/824#discussion_r72732670
--- Diff: lib/atscppapi/examples/experimental/websocket/WSBuffer.cc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+#include "WSBuffer.hh"
--- End diff --
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/824#discussion_r72732703
--- Diff: lib/atscppapi/examples/Makefile.am ---
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
# See the License for the specific language governing permissions
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/824#discussion_r72732848
--- Diff: lib/atscppapi/examples/experimental/websocket/WSBuffer.cc ---
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+#include "WSBuffer.hh"
+
+#include &quo
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/824#discussion_r72732656
--- Diff: lib/atscppapi/examples/experimental/websocket/WSBuffer.hh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+#ifndef WS_BUFFER_HH_HEADERS_
+#define
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
We don't really use event return values outside of event handlers, so if we
return a failure from ``accept()``, it should just be a ``bool``.
Originally, the contract
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/833
There are quite a few changes that seem unrelated to the proposed API. Can
you separate those out into an independent PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/847#discussion_r74273262
--- Diff: proxy/http2/Http2Stream.cc ---
@@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ Http2Stream::update_write_request(IOBufferReader
*buf_reader, int64_t write_len
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/847
Also, there's a typo in the commit subject line ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/829
@amc we should have this discussion on ``@dev``. My main objection to this
API is that is makes promises it doesn't (maybe can't) keep. It just tells you
whether this is HTTP/1 or HTTP/2
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/838
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/835
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/835
TS-4709: Separate LogFilter expression parsing.
Separate LogFilter expression parsing from the configuration file
parser so that it can be tested and reused in other contexts.
You can
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/850
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/851
TS-4548: Convert custom log config file to Lua
Initial implementation of ``logging.config`` which is a Lua configuration
file for custom logs.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/851
Ping @shukitchan @zwoop
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/842#discussion_r74106638
--- Diff: proxy/http2/Http2ClientSession.h ---
@@ -243,6 +243,12 @@ class Http2ClientSession : public ProxyClientSession
return "h
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/850
Ping @zwoop @pbchou
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/853
Is ``SSL_add1_chain_cert`` different from ``SSL_add0_chain_cert``?
This looks good to me ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
Thanks @oknet. Can you please document the invariants for ``accept`` in
``I_SessionAccept.h``?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/864
I guess the key phrase from RFC 2616 is ``if the field-value might differ
from that sent in any previous response``. What happens if the origin had an
``Expires`` but not it doesn't? RFC7232
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/851#discussion_r74668539
--- Diff: proxy/logging/LogConfig.cc ---
@@ -493,14 +494,21 @@ void
LogConfig::setup_log_objects()
{
Debug("log", "c
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/850
TS-4728: Remove invalid LogHost assertion.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jpeach/trafficserver fix/4728
Alternatively
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/822#discussion_r74539863
--- Diff: proxy/InkAPI.cc ---
@@ -4982,6 +4982,15 @@ TSHttpTxnInfoIntGet(TSHttpTxn txnp, TSHttpTxnInfoKey
key, TSMgmtInt *value)
return
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/822#discussion_r74539983
--- Diff: doc/developer-guide/api/functions/TSHttpTxnIsWebsocket.en.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+.. Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/824
@ogoodman Would you mind moving the C++ API changes to the other PR so we
can keep API changes together?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/864
TS-4751: Prune cached headers before merging the updated response.
When we update a cached response with a new server response, make
sure to delete any cache-related beforehand
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/864
Ping @zwoop @bryancall @SolidWallOfCode
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/794
This looks alright to me. The one part I'm a little concerned about is the
changes to the dirent allocation, but I don't think there will be any problems
with too-long filenames in practice
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/795
TS-4655: Remove SessionAccept pointer from SSLNetVConnection.
SSLNetVConnection never uses the SessionAccept pointer, so remove
it and the associated setter and getter. Tidy up
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/791
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/796
@zwoop This is a stopgap to fix the error messages until we can do the
larger refactoring in TS-4660.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/796
TS-4660: Improve remap.config error messages.
Improve some of the confusion about which error message buffer to
use in remap_parse_config_bti. The final message is now constructed
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/797
TS-4659: Log format errors on startup.
Remove extraneous field name constants which accidentally match
with strstr().
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/817
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/773
ð This looks good to me and I think it will be safe w/
"TsHttpTxnServerAddrSet()".
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/816
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/818
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/819#discussion_r71649770
--- Diff: lib/ts/ink_config.h.in ---
@@ -127,5 +127,6 @@
#define TS_BUILD_CANONICAL_HOST "@host@"
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/818#discussion_r71650582
--- Diff: lib/ts/tests.cc ---
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
limitations under the License.
*/
-#include "ts/TestBox.h"
+#i
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/815
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/805
This follows the pattern of the other APIs, but I notice the initialization
is not thread safe. Shall we file a separate JIRA for that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/805
The documentation for this API family is in
{{doc/developer-guide/api/functions/TSInstallDirGet.en.rst}}, Just mention the
new API there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/802
I don't think this change is correct. It seems to me that the invariant is
that ``server_session`` and ``server_entry`` should be NULL or non-NULL
together. So if we call
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/801#discussion_r71073791
--- Diff: proxy/ProxyClientSession.cc ---
@@ -142,7 +141,9 @@ ProxyClientSession::do_api_callout(TSHttpHookID id)
this->api_current = N
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/801#discussion_r71073823
--- Diff: proxy/ProxyClientSession.cc ---
@@ -142,7 +141,9 @@ ProxyClientSession::do_api_callout(TSHttpHookID id)
this->api_current = N
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/807
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/808
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/801
Ah. The invariant is that you are not supposed to be getting IO events
during session hook processing. Maybe the fact that this is happening is the
root cause of the bug?
This change
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/801#discussion_r71265855
--- Diff: configure.ac ---
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([-Wall -Werror -Wno-portability
tar-ustar foreign no-installinf
AM_MAINTAINER_MODE
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/807
Yeh lets have a new JIRA for that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/779
Loods good ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/815
File scope would not work since these initializers can depend on librecords.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/815
These are globals, so I don't think that thread local storage makes sense
here.
There are 2 reasonable approaches to this. The most straight-forward is to
use static initialization
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/813#discussion_r71446015
--- Diff: proxy/logging/Log.cc ---
@@ -925,6 +925,7 @@ Log::init(int flags)
if (config_flags & STANDALONE_COLLATOR) {
co
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/813
ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/799
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/779#discussion_r71102843
--- Diff: plugins/experimental/ts_lua/ts_lua_http.c ---
@@ -29,8 +29,36 @@ typedef enum {
TS_LUA_CACHE_LOOKUP_SKIPPED
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/779#discussion_r71103080
--- Diff: plugins/experimental/ts_lua/ts_lua.c ---
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ TSRemapDeleteInstance(void *ih)
}
TSRemapStatus
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/808
TS-4673: Remove unused HttpSM::historical_action.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jpeach/trafficserver fix/4873
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/779#discussion_r71103039
--- Diff: plugins/experimental/ts_lua/ts_lua.c ---
@@ -140,13 +141,15 @@ TSRemapDoRemap(void *ih, TSHttpTxn rh,
TSRemapRequestInfo *rri
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/801
I had to re-read this code to refresh my memory on how this works. I think
that the invariant that the ``ProxyClientSession`` requires is that the API
hooks are the first and last operations
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/807
TS-4672: Add lifecycle events to hook-trace example plugin.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jpeach/trafficserver fix/4672
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/840
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/829#discussion_r73769255
--- Diff: proxy/InkAPI.cc ---
@@ -4655,6 +4655,15 @@ TSHttpTxnClientReqGet(TSHttpTxn txnp, TSMBuffer
*bufp, TSMLoc *obj)
return TS_ERROR
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/823
You don't need to hold a mutex to free anything. In all of these cases, the
callee is supposed to consume both parameters. For consistency, we should not
sometime consume only some
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/840
TS-4711: Remove proxy.config.log.custom_logs_enabled.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jpeach/trafficserver fix/TS-4711
GitHub user jpeach reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/869
TS-4716: Install manpages in $PREFIX/share/man.
Update various layouts to default to installing manpages into
$PREFIX/share/man. Some layouts already did this, but it is probably
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/870
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jpeach opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/869
TS-4716: Install manpages in $PREFIX/share/man.
Update various layouts to default to installing manpages into
$PREFIX/share/man. Some layouts already did this, but it is probably
worth
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/851
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/851
@zwoop @shukitchan I removed the configuration option and added a little
Lua stack helper class I had been thinking about.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/859#discussion_r74778707
--- Diff: proxy/InkAPI.cc ---
@@ -2208,6 +2208,20 @@ TSUrlPathSet(TSMBuffer bufp, TSMLoc obj, const char
*value, int length)
return URLPartSet
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/864
The problem we hit was we had a bogus Age (12000) header cached. Since the
origin was no linger sending an Age header, the object would never become fresh.
One common case could
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/849
This change looks consistent with the nearby handling of ``is_done`` ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/859#discussion_r74778730
--- Diff: proxy/InkAPI.cc ---
@@ -2208,6 +2208,20 @@ TSUrlPathSet(TSMBuffer bufp, TSMLoc obj, const char
*value, int length)
return URLPartSet
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/858
ð
We could also just pass the ``mandatory`` flag to the checking macro, which
would produce better warning messages, but this is OK too. Consider adding a
check for the minimum
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/864
AFAICT the RFC7232 language was introduced in HTTPbis ticket
[#406](https://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/406). It seems like this
change was regarded as a bug fix to RFC2616 rather
GitHub user jpeach opened an issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1423
traffic_ctl status is broken
```
# /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config status
traffic_ctl: [11] Invalid parameters passed into function call.
```
---
If your project is set
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1357
Whilst the configuration of SSL keys and certificates is a bit unfortunate,
I think that it is important to be consistent.
Separately, you have to define the base directory
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102379397
--- Diff: proxy/http/remap/RemapConfig.cc ---
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ remap_load_plugin(const char **argv, int argc,
url_mapping *mp, char *errbuf
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102379269
--- Diff: proxy/Plugin.cc ---
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ plugin_init(bool validateOnly)
if (INIT_ONCE) {
api_init
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102378986
--- Diff: proxy/Main.cc ---
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include "ts/ink_syslog.h"
#include "ts/hugepages.h"
+#inclu
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102378964
--- Diff: proxy/Main.cc ---
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#include "ts/ink_syslog.h"
#include "ts/hugepages.h"
+#inclu
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102379416
--- Diff: proxy/Plugin.cc ---
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ plugin_init(bool validateOnly)
if (INIT_ONCE) {
api_init
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102378936
--- Diff: proxy/FetchSM.cc ---
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include
#include "HTTP.h"
#include "PluginVC.h"
+#include
Github user jpeach commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1460#discussion_r102378869
--- Diff: lib/wccp/Makefile.am ---
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@
include $(top_srcdir)/build/tidy.mk
AM_CPPFLAGS = \
- -I$(abs_top_srcdir
Github user jpeach closed the issue at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1468
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1479
I don't get how this is better than the previous version. That was purely
compile time and this compares the global `typeid` constants at runtime. It
doesn't seem better.
---
If your
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1423
```
[jpeach@sk1 trafficserver]$ /opt/ats/bin/traffic_ctl config status
Apache Traffic Server - traffic_server - 7.2.0 - (build # 022120 on Feb 21
2017 at 20:56:37)
Started at Tue
Github user jpeach closed the issue at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1423
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1469
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1461
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user jpeach commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/1475
Check the verbose log to ensure that Lua was excluded from ASAN correctly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
1 - 100 of 679 matches
Mail list logo
