[jira] [Created] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

Andrew Purtell created HBASE-19708: -- Summary: Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed Key: HBASE-19708 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Description: Rare NPE when the listener's accept channel is closed. We serialize access to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19483) Add proper privilege check for rsgroup commands

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312107#comment-16312107 ] Appy commented on HBASE-19483: -- Posted last few comments. Minor stuff. Looks good to go in after them. >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Attachment: HBASE-19708-branch-1.patch Looks like just a problem for branch-1 > Avoid NPE

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Fix Version/s: 1.5.0 1.4.1 1.3.2 > Avoid NPE when the

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

Josh Elser created HBASE-19709: -- Summary: Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore Key: HBASE-19709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19662) hbase-metrics-api fails checkstyle due to wrong import order

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-19662: --- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) trunk build has been running

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312288#comment-16312288 ] Reid Chan commented on HBASE-19709: --- Looks like {{private static final int AVAIL_PROCESSORS =

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312204#comment-16312204 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-19709: lgtm > Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19710) hbase:namespace table was stuck in transition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-19710: --- Attachment: master-006.tar.gz rs-009.log.tar.gz master-005-log.tar.gz 009

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19710) hbase:namespace table was stuck in transition

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312248#comment-16312248 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-19710: The build I used corresponded to this commit: HBASE-19667 Get rid of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19488) Remove Unused Code from CollectionUtils

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312218#comment-16312218 ] Appy commented on HBASE-19488: -- There are like 22 imports of org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.CollectionUtils.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312257#comment-16312257 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-19688: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #4344 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312269#comment-16312269 ] Reid Chan commented on HBASE-19709: --- +1 > Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated HBASE-19709: --- Attachment: HBASE-19709.001.branch-2.patch .001 Pretty simple change to just make sure that we don't

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Josh Elser updated HBASE-19709: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-19710) hbase:namespace table was stuck in transition

Ted Yu created HBASE-19710: -- Summary: hbase:namespace table was stuck in transition Key: HBASE-19710 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19710 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Description: Rare NPE when the listener's accept channel is closed. We serialize access to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Description: Rare NPE when the listener's accept channel is closed. We serialize access to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-19688: --- Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Thanks for the patch, Reid Test failure

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18693) adding an option to restore_snapshot to move mob files from archive dir to working dir

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312387#comment-16312387 ] Jingcheng Du commented on HBASE-18693: -- Thanks [~huaxiang]! I am +1 to V3. > adding an option to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312408#comment-16312408 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19708: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312409#comment-16312409 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19708: Does this change make another NPE when stopping

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19568) Restore of HBase table using incremental backup doesn't restore rows from an earlier incremental backup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Vladimir Rodionov updated HBASE-19568: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Restore of HBase table using incremental backup

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19673) Backport " Periodically ensure records are not buffered too long by BufferedMutator" to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312394#comment-16312394 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19673: bq. What if we simply say: in 1.x you can only set it

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312521#comment-16312521 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19636: --- Will commit after fixing the checkstyle issue. > All rs should

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-19707) Race in start and terminate of a replication source after we async start replicatione endpoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang reassigned HBASE-19707: - Assignee: Duo Zhang > Race in start and terminate of a replication source after we async start

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312415#comment-16312415 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19709: bq. Or only 1 processor, so (int) (1 * 0.5) becomes

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-19708: --- Attachment: HBASE-19708-branch-1.patch Updated patch > Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312414#comment-16312414 ] Andrew Purtell edited comment on HBASE-19708 at 1/5/18 3:05 AM: Updated

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19568) Restore of HBase table using incremental backup doesn't restore rows from an earlier incremental backup

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312450#comment-16312450 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19568: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312526#comment-16312526 ] Duo Zhang edited comment on HBASE-19636 at 1/5/18 6:07 AM: --- Pushed to branch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312400#comment-16312400 ] Reid Chan commented on HBASE-19709: --- Or only 1 processor, so (int) (1 * 0.5) becomes zero. > Guard

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19163) "Maximum lock count exceeded" from region server's batch processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312437#comment-16312437 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19163: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19506) Support variable sized chunks from ChunkCreator

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312475#comment-16312475 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-19506: bq.As for solution, we suggest to create

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-19711: -- Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Bug) Parent: HBASE-19397 >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312396#comment-16312396 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19709: Is it a common case that

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-19636: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: HBASE-19397 Status:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312411#comment-16312411 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-19708: bq. Does this change make another NPE when stopping

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312424#comment-16312424 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-19708: LGTM > Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19708) Avoid NPE when the RPC listener's accept channel is closed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312492#comment-16312492 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19708: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

Duo Zhang created HBASE-19711: - Summary: TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs Key: HBASE-19711 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711 Project: HBase Issue

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang reassigned HBASE-19711: -- Assignee: Guanghao Zhang > TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang updated HBASE-19711: --- Fix Version/s: HBASE-19397 > TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang updated HBASE-19711: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19707) Race in start and terminate of a replication source after we async start replicatione endpoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-19707: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Race in start and terminate of a replication source after we

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19707) Race in start and terminate of a replication source after we async start replicatione endpoint

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-19707: -- Attachment: HBASE-19707-HBASE-19397.patch > Race in start and terminate of a replication source after

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang updated HBASE-19711: --- Attachment: HBASE-19711.HBASE-19397.001.patch >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19711) TestReplicationAdmin.testConcurrentPeerOperations hangs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312642#comment-16312642 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19711: --- I think peer related operations are rare, so let's name it as

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311067#comment-16311067 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19703: We can set Split policy at HTD level or using conf

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311086#comment-16311086 ] Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-19696: -- Fine, I'm OK :-) > Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311130#comment-16311130 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19703: I see what u say now. We have configureForRegion(HRegion

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang updated HBASE-19636: --- Attachment: HBASE-19636.HBASE-19397.004.patch > All rs should already start work with the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19397) Design procedures for ReplicationManager to notify peer change event from master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-19397: -- Release Note: Introduce 5 procedures to do peer modifications: AddPeerProcedure RemovePeerProcedure

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guanghao Zhang updated HBASE-19636: --- Attachment: HBASE-19636.HBASE-19397.003.patch > All rs should already start work with the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-19706: -- Attachment: HBASE-19706.patch > Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311082#comment-16311082 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19696: Nice digging in Ankit.. Thanks for the great work. On

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311108#comment-16311108 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on HBASE-19703: - [~anoop.hbase] bq.We can set Split

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311123#comment-16311123 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19706: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311136#comment-16311136 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19696: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19634) Add permission check for executeProcedures in AccessController

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-19634: -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: HBASE-19397 Status:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311085#comment-16311085 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19696: Can we fix the other issue as part of another jira pls?

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19664) MOB should compatible with other types of Compactor in addition to DefaultCompactor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chenxu updated HBASE-19664: --- Attachment: HBASE-19664-master-v1.patch a simple patch to resolve this > MOB should compatible with other

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-19706: -- Affects Version/s: 2.0.0-beta-1 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Cells

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-19706: -- Attachment: HBASE-19706_v1.patch > Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311081#comment-16311081 ] Zheng Hu commented on HBASE-19696: -- {code} case INCLUDE_AND_SEEK_NEXT_ROW: +if (matchCode

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311598#comment-16311598 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19636: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reid Chan updated HBASE-19688: -- Attachment: HBASE-19688.master.001.patch > TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311624#comment-16311624 ] Reid Chan commented on HBASE-19688: --- QA... [Facepalm] Trigger it again. >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reid Chan updated HBASE-19688: -- Status: Open (was: Patch Available) > TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reid Chan updated HBASE-19688: -- Attachment: (was: HBASE-19688.master.001.patch) > TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Reid Chan updated HBASE-19688: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-19358) Improve the stability of splitting log when do fail over

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yu Li reopened HBASE-19358: --- Reopening since this is not committed to branch-2 yet and the branch-2 v2 patch cannot apply cleanly on latest

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19163) "Maximum lock count exceeded" from region server's batch processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] huaxiang sun updated HBASE-19163: - Attachment: HBASE-19163-branch-1-v001.patch patch for branch-1, I removed the config knob for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19709) Guard against a ThreadPool size of 0 in CleanerChore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16312353#comment-16312353 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19709: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19358) Improve the stability of splitting log when do fail over

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311715#comment-16311715 ] Appy commented on HBASE-19358: -- i was wondering that when i got merge conflicts with this one when

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19651) Remove LimitInputStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311728#comment-16311728 ] stack commented on HBASE-19651: --- Thanks for update. +1 on commit > Remove LimitInputStream >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14252) RegionServers fail to start when setting hbase.ipc.server.callqueue.scan.ratio to 0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311734#comment-16311734 ] Appy commented on HBASE-14252: -- Backport to 1.2 please? > RegionServers fail to start when setting >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19391) Calling HRegion#initializeRegionInternals from a region replica can still re-create a region directory

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311738#comment-16311738 ] huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19391: -- +1. With HBASE-18625, I think this case will happen less

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19364) Truncate_preserve fails with table when replica region > 1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311742#comment-16311742 ] huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19364: -- Hi [~pankaj2461], did you check if the issue exists in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18693) adding an option to restore_snapshot to move mob files from archive dir to working dir

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311744#comment-16311744 ] huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-18693: -- Hi [~jingcheng.du], just want to follow up the review

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19688) TimeToLiveProcedureWALCleaner should extends BaseLogCleanerDelegate

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311768#comment-16311768 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19688: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311227#comment-16311227 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-19703: I think since the Split proc is in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311249#comment-16311249 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19636: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311228#comment-16311228 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-19703: I commented before seeing the patch. Ya

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19636) All rs should already start work with the new peer change when replication peer procedure is finished

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311270#comment-16311270 ] Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19636: --- Is the failed UT related? > All rs should already start work with

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-19664) MOB should compatible with other types of Compactor in addition to DefaultCompactor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311193#comment-16311193 ] chenxu edited comment on HBASE-19664 at 1/4/18 11:16 AM: - bq. Though am not fully

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19664) MOB should compatible with other types of Compactor in addition to DefaultCompactor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311193#comment-16311193 ] chenxu commented on HBASE-19664: bg.Though am not fully convinced by the approach of removing the own

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311191#comment-16311191 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-19706: This is also a regression? Older

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311197#comment-16311197 ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla commented on HBASE-19703: - [~anoop.hbase] Here is the WIP patch

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19703) Functionality added as part of HBASE-12583 is not working after moving the split code to master

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19703?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla updated HBASE-19703: Attachment: HBASE-19703-WIP.patch > Functionality added as part of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18452) VerifyReplication by Snapshot should cache HDFS token before submit job for kerberos env.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311274#comment-16311274 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-18452: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-Trunk_matrix #4341 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311314#comment-16311314 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19706: Another nice one Ankit.. Change looks good... Just add

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311396#comment-16311396 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-19696: ExplicitColumnTracker is marked Private. I feel adding doneWithColumn()

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19673) Backport " Periodically ensure records are not buffered too long by BufferedMutator" to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16310982#comment-16310982 ] Niels Basjes commented on HBASE-19673: -- What if we simply say: in 1.x you can only set it during

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

Ankit Singhal created HBASE-19706: - Summary: Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan Key: HBASE-19706 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706 Project:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16311073#comment-16311073 ] Ankit Singhal commented on HBASE-19696: --- Thank you guys for the review. bq. BTW, I have another

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19696) Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip remaining versions when scan has explicit columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ankit Singhal updated HBASE-19696: -- Attachment: HBASE-19696_v1.patch > Filter returning INCLUDE_AND_NEXT_COL doesn't skip

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19706) Cells are always eclipsed by Deleted cells even if in time range scan

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=1632#comment-1632 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-19706: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

  1   2   >