[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476770
]
Dan Zivkovic commented on LUCENE-819:
-
While I appreciate that you guys are trying to keep things going in a clea
: Guess suggesting to use this in user-list replies would be considered "over
: advertising", but too late at least for
: http://www.nabble.com/Best-way-to-returning-hits-after-search--tf3304485.html
I think the good baseline is to compare it with HitCollector ... it's hte
kind of thing that need
>
> : Guess there are no reservations on the subject; I'll enhance the
> : documentation of this mechanism.
>
> Sorry ... i'm a little behind on my mail ...
I think I know what you mean...
> I wouldn't go advertising it *too* heavily ... i think directly using
> FieldCache is definitely an "Exper
Chris Hostetter wrote:
I kind of glossed over this when Nicolas first sent it -- but it makes
total sense ... if a redaio button in Jira is legaly binding enough to
allow someone with a signed CLA to commit into the repository and include
in a release, then a checkbox on a "web form based documen
: Guess there are no reservations on the subject; I'll enhance the
: documentation of this mechanism.
Sorry ... i'm a little behind on my mail ...
I wouldn't go advertising it *too* heavily ... i think directly using
FieldCache is definitely an "Expert" level thing, and we tend to keep the
docum
: I will ask on legal-discuss if click-agreement is sufficient.
: > I don't know how confluence works, but maybe it is possible to make
: > a "click-agreement" like the one there is in Jira while submitting
: > patches ?
I kind of glossed over this when Nicolas first sent it -- but it makes
tota
Viewtier has also volunteered to provide Continuous Integration
and nightly builds for Lucene (running under Parabuild):
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/index.htm?displaygroupid=5
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
S
Guess there are no reservations on the subject; I'll enhance the
documentation of this mechanism.
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering about the exposure (or not) of FieldCache in the
> documentation. FieldCache is used by Lucene, internally, for sort
purposes.
> Being an interface, it is also exposed as pu
Sounds like Lius & Tika would make a nice couple, Rida.
Otis
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Simpy -- http://www.simpy.com/ - Tag - Search - Share
- Original Message
From: mark harwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476671
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-819:
-
I really don't see a need to change any code. People aren't making mistak
28 feb 2007 kl. 19.19 skrev Doug Cutting:
karl wettin wrote:
How about Bamboo? That would fit nice with Jira and Confluence.
We have a volunteer Hadoop committer (Nigel Daley) who's
administering Hudson on lucene.zones.apache.org. If you know a
committer who will setup and maintain Bamb
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476667
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-819:
-
> why not just apply the patch and move on?
Two reasons: (1) most folks c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476664
]
Dan Zivkovic commented on LUCENE-819:
-
Empty string or null would be the same thing from the point of view of our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12476663
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-819:
-
It would be best to check for null in the constructor rather than in the
karl wettin wrote:
How about Bamboo? That would fit nice with Jira and Confluence.
We have a volunteer Hadoop committer (Nigel Daley) who's administering
Hudson on lucene.zones.apache.org. If you know a committer who will
setup and maintain Bamboo there, then that could be an option too.
D
Hi Rida,
I've been talking with Jukka Zitting (involved in Nutch) about parsing/Tika and
we started to sketch out some project objectives on the Wiki over there which
may be of interest:
http://code.google.com/p/tika/w/list
I recently did a round-up of the main open source projects which mainta
Hi Otis,
Many thanks for your comments, I'm so sorry for this late answer. I will add
lius as lucene contrib and I will change the licence to ASL.
There are some developper contributing to Lius but there are not very
active.
For the question : this is a Laval University project, right? But you wo
28 feb 2007 kl. 14.55 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
FYI: We are exploring using Hudson to manage our nightly builds.
Check out the link (and up one). Seems like it should be a lot
better than maintaining a shell script.
How about Bamboo? That would fit nice with Jira and Confluence.
(That is
I will ask on legal-discuss if click-agreement is sufficient.
-Grant
On Feb 24, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
Le samedi 24 février 2007 13:52, Grant Ingersoll a écrit :
Sigh.
On http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CWIKI/Index
Read the FAQ entry titled "But what if we would
FYI: We are exploring using Hudson to manage our nightly builds.
Check out the link (and up one). Seems like it should be a lot
better than maintaining a shell script.
-Grant
On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene
Somehow I missed the very first message in this thread.
James, did you upload a patch with your changes to JIRA?
Otis
- Original Message
From: James Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 1:02:38 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Field constructor
21 matches
Mail list logo
