[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515630
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
Mark,
The exhausted flag is only in the iterator/Matcher, not in the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-584:
Hi Mark, we used to use Filters a lot... and concluded, Matcher is great! It
just takes some time to get it in head, let me try to help you get there :)
I saw BitSetMatcher etc and appreciate the motivation behind the design for
alternative
First I create a single large file that has one doc per line
from
Wikipedia content, using this alg
Anybody disagree that the 1-line-per-doc format is better (at least for
Wikipedia)? If so, I'll get rid of the intermediate one-file-per-doc
step.
On 7/26/07, Steven Parkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First I create a single large file that has one doc per line
from
Wikipedia content, using this alg
Anybody disagree that the 1-line-per-doc format is better (at least for
Wikipedia)? If so, I'll get rid of the intermediate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515840
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-965:
--
Can we store the document length (with multiple fields) and average
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515850
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-965:
-
Did I miss something?
What I meant is that the loops added by this
Some time ago I tried to introduce LUCENE-581, a new consumer top
layer, the core changes required by LUCENE-550, my InstantaitedIndex.
I would still like to see this a part of the core. It is completely
backwards compatible but contains a few small changes that seems to
be convtroversial,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-743:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.3
IndexReader.reopen()
Key: LUCENE-743
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-794:
---
Attachment: spanhighlighter10.patch
Requested changes have been made. Only relevant file now is
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
2. Release 2.4 so all of Mike M's goodness is available to 1.4 users
within the next 2-4 weeks using our new release mechanism (i.e code
Hi Grant,
2-4 weeks seems quite soon considering that 2.2 is very new and that
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
2. Release 2.4 so all of Mike M's goodness is available to 1.4 users
within the next 2-4 weeks using our new release mechanism (i.e code
Hi Grant,
2-4 weeks seems quite soon considering that 2.2 is very new and that
there are a lot of open issues targeted for 2.3. For
On 26-Jul-07, at 5:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I propose we take the following path for migrating Lucene Java to
JDK 1.5:
1. Put in any new deprecations we want, cleanups, etc.
2. Release 2.4 so all of Mike M's goodness is available to 1.4
users within the next 2-4 weeks using our new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-865?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic reassigned LUCENE-865:
---
Assignee: Otis Gospodnetic
SpellChecker not working because of stale IndexSearcher
I propose we take the following path for migrating Lucene Java to
JDK 1.5:
1. Put in any new deprecations we want, cleanups, etc.
2. Release 2.4 so all of Mike M's goodness is available to 1.4 users
within the next 2-4 weeks using our new release mechanism (i.e code
freeze, branch,
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
Frankly, I am amazed at the pace of GCJ, but it is hard to imagine
that
with so much free code out there doing what they need, that it could
take much longer to get 1.5 support.
Just guessing, but could it be that the features in 1.5 and 1.6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic updated LUCENE-831:
Comment: was deleted
Complete overhaul of FieldCache API/Implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515911
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-794:
-
Mark, wow, long list of files up there. I can't tell which ones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515908
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-898:
-
I've emailed Kelvin and asked for his thoughts. Maybe he'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-781.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
MultiSegmentReader.isOptimized() now always returns false.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515854
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-965:
--
I guess I would not be in favor of a special term, I would rather see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-967:
--
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Add tokenize documents only task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-967:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-967.patch
Attached patch that adds ReadTokensTask.java. I also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515797
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-781:
-
I looked into the javadocs built with this patch and I can't see the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515773
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-965:
-
It does seem like calculating the average field length at index time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515768
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-966:
Great patch! And a very quick turnaround to boot!
I am seeing a HUGE speed
Hello Hui:
Thank you for contributing your axiomatic retrieval function to Lucene.
Can not wait for the test drive :)
Would you please report your setting for your experiment on
Collection Function MAP [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NumRR
ROBUST04
A faster JFlex-based replacement for StandardAnalyzer
-
Key: LUCENE-966
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Hi Karl,
I have seen this and have always thought I should spend some time on
it, but then didn't get to it. That isn't to say it isn't useful. I
think one thing I wonder about is if there is a way it could be a
standalone contrib package or maybe there is a way to separate out
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515882
]
Paul Smith commented on LUCENE-966:
---
We did pretty much the same thing here at Aconex, The tokenization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515846
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-965:
I guess I would not be in favor of a special term, I would rather
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515803
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-965:
-
It does seem like calculating the average field length at index time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515783
]
Charlie Zhao commented on LUCENE-965:
-
Hello Hui:
Thank you for contributing your axiomatic retrieval function
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515726
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-966:
-
Thanks Staszek, very nice!
If FastTokenizer is compatible with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966:
-
Attachment: AnalyzerBenchmark.java
Here is a very simple benchmark I used to test the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12515833
]
Charlie Zhao commented on LUCENE-965:
-
Document Length and Average Document Length are sort of speed
Add tokenize documents only task to contrib/benchmark
---
Key: LUCENE-967
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-836:
---
Attachment: lucene-836.benchmark.quality.patch
A ready to commit patch for search quality
39 matches
Mail list logo
