[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743816#action_12743816
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1794:
bq. right now consumers like lucene indexing call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reassigned LUCENE-1791:
Assignee: Hoss Man
> Enhance QueryUtils and CheckHIts to wrap everything they check in
> MultiRea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1791:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1791.patch
i put the doc "ids" into a KEY field and refactored ItemizedFilter to be a
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/921/changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1522:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1522-fix-SIOOBE.patch
The patch includes the fix and a test case.
> anot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi reopened LUCENE-1522:
There is a bug in BaseFragmentsBuilder. When the highlighting field is not
stored, StringInde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743791#action_12743791
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1794:
--
bq. But even before this I think we should ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743788#action_12743788
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1794:
-
{quote}
Robert, if possible, I'd like to get th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743786#action_12743786
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1794:
-
To not break back compat, everything has got to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743780#action_12743780
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1808:
I thought that's partly we took care of here:
ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743778#action_12743778
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1794:
I guess you're both right. I thought that one day
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743776#action_12743776
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1794:
--
In general, we should strive to treat our bas
Some Lucene tests try and use a Junit Assert in new threads
---
Key: LUCENE-1814
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1814
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743774#action_12743774
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1794:
-
Shai, I will take a look at your patch as soon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743771#action_12743771
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1808 at 8/15/09 1:43 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743771#action_12743771
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1808:
-
Done you have the above problem though:
{quote}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743770#action_12743770
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1794:
Well ... it's true and false at the same time. On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743767#action_12743767
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1808:
When I changed createQueryWeight from protected t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-1813:
--
Attachment: reverseMark-2.patch
Updated patch that moves the marking logic to incremen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743763#action_12743763
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1794:
--
Perhaps the Streams class should be part of R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743762#action_12743762
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1808:
-
Ahh - nice catch. I'm not sure what to do here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743761#action_12743761
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1808:
bq. I can always extend a class and make a packag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743760#action_12743760
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1808:
bq. Can't you open up visibility without breaking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1794:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1794-reusing-analyzer.patch
Apologies for the late post, I had a busy weekend. At
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743755#action_12743755
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1808:
-
1. make createWeight() public on Query (breaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743754#action_12743754
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1808:
-
I havn't yet figured out how to do this without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1790:
Attachment: LUCENE-1790.patch
remove some unused imports
added missing license header
Added hashC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743747#action_12743747
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1790:
-
BoostingFunctionTermQuery implements equals but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743743#action_12743743
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1813:
---
Either way is fine with me. To pres
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743740#action_12743740
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1813:
-
andrzej, the reverse() methods are public, can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743737#action_12743737
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1813:
-
the corresponding solr task (SOLR-1321) is mark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-1813:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> Add option to ReverseStringFilter to mark reversed tokens
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-1813:
--
Attachment: reverseMark.patch
Patch and unit tests.
> Add option to ReverseStringFilt
Add option to ReverseStringFilter to mark reversed tokens
-
Key: LUCENE-1813
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1813
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743730#action_12743730
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1794:
-
Yonik, ok, I will look over the patch again, bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743728#action_12743728
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1794:
--
Yes, I think we should just commit this now -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743727#action_12743727
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1794:
-
Yonik, thanks for reviewing it.
I wanted to wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-1812:
--
Attachment: pruning.patch
Patch relative to the current trunk.
> Static index pruning
Static index pruning by in-document term frequency (Carmel pruning)
---
Key: LUCENE-1812
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743721#action_12743721
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1794:
--
Patch looks good - do you plan on committing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1811.
Resolution: Fixed
> TestIndexReaderReopen nightly build failure
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743715#action_12743715
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1811:
I believe this is just a thread-s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743668#action_12743668
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1792:
On quick glance the patch looks g
This failure looks real. We hit a spooky AIOOBE in
TestIndexReaderReopen.testThreadSafety. I've opened
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1811 to track it.
Mike
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Apache Hudson
Server wrote:
> See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/9
TestIndexReaderReopen nightly build failure
---
Key: LUCENE-1811
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1811
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Index
Affects Ve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1809.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Thanks Koji!
> highlight-vs-vector-hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12743666#action_12743666
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1809:
Patch looks good, thanks Koji. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1809:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> highlight-vs-vector-highlight.alg is unfair
> -
48 matches
Mail list logo
