[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1947:
Attachment: LUCENE-1947.patch
* Added Snowball license header to static Snowball classes (Snowball
> I intend to fire up IDEA, run java5-specific code inspections and fix
> whatever it finds, something automatically (with manual review
> afterwards), something by hand.
>
> 1. Replace for/while loops that go through arrays/lists by index, or
> through collections by iterators with for-each loops.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763365#action_12763365
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1938:
--
{quote}
I looked at the pipeline Prec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763352#action_12763352
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1960 at 10/7/09 9:40 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763352#action_12763352
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
Just one question: What happens with indexe
Remove remaining deprecations in document package
-
Key: LUCENE-1961
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1961
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763334#action_12763334
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1937:
--
Hi Luis,
{quote}
Wouldn't it be bett
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1960.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 822978.
> Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1959:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1959.patch
First cut of the index splitter which allows listing segme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: lucene-1960.patch
All core & contrib tests pass.
> Remove deprecated Field.Store.
Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
--
Key: LUCENE-1960
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Michael Busch
Ass
I intend to fire up IDEA, run java5-specific code inspections and fix
whatever it finds, something automatically (with manual review
afterwards), something by hand.
1. Replace for/while loops that go through arrays/lists by index, or
through collections by iterators with for-each loops.
This just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763303#action_12763303
]
Mark Bennett commented on LUCENE-1636:
--
Uwe,
Your comments were a home run, thanks!
Index Splitter
--
Key: LUCENE-1959
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Index
Affects Versions: 2.9
Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763297#action_12763297
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1958:
-
this says affects version: 2.4.1, do you see th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763293#action_12763293
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1958:
-
You should ask bug or normal on the email lists
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1951:
Attachment: LUCENE-1951_bwcompatbranch.patch
patch to the back compat branch to fix the buggy wild
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1957.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 822930.
> Remove deprecated Filter.bits() and make Fil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1951:
Attachment: LUCENE-1951.patch
patch for these issues.
note: the existing TestWildCardQuery.testTer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1957:
--
Attachment: lucene-1957.patch
Removes the deprecated bits() method and all references from cor
Bug.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:31 PM, MRIT64 (JIRA) wrote:
> ShingleFilter creates shingles across two consecutives documents : bug or
> normal behaviour ?
>
>
>
> Key: LUCENE-1958
>
ShingleFilter creates shingles across two consecutives documents : bug or
normal behaviour ?
Key: LUCENE-1958
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763185#action_12763185
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1938 at 10/7/09 1:08 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763228#action_12763228
]
Chris Pilsworth commented on LUCENE-1952:
-
I have not used any in the past, howeve
On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Michael Busch (JIRA) wrote:
Fix javadoc comments in search package
--
Key: LUCENE-1956
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1956
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: T
Remove deprecated Filter.bits() and make Filter.getDocIdSet() abstract.
---
Key: LUCENE-1957
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1957
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
Fix javadoc comments in search package
--
Key: LUCENE-1956
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1956
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Search
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1856.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed the latest patch.
> Remove Hits
> ---
>
>
I noticed that in Searchable now all search() methods are marked as
"low-level" search APIs. And most of them even as "Expert". The search
methods that returned Hits used to be what we called the 'high-level" APIs.
How should we change that? I think we could just remove the "low-level"
and "hi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763185#action_12763185
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1938:
Hi Erik,
Should we remove the PrecedenceQueryPa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763180#action_12763180
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1938:
Hi,
I looked at the pipeline PrecedenceQueryNode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1856:
--
Attachment: lucene-1856-javadocs.patch
> Remove Hits
> ---
>
> Key: LU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763176#action_12763176
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1937:
Hi Adriano,
Wouldn't it be better for the pipeli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-1856:
---
Oh man, I didn't even remove the classes (Hits, Hit, HitIterator) themselves :)
Forgot the 'svn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763118#action_12763118
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1951:
-
here are some stats for rewriting wildcards tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1458:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1458.patch
New patch attached. All tests pass.
I simplified the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763097#action_12763097
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
bq. I haven't but it sounds like you have!
Not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763087#action_12763087
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1257:
-
Also, we can remove tons of boxing/unbo
Woops, I put this fix onto the 2.4 back-compat branch, not the new 2.9
one, yesterday.
I just fixed it (I think!) on the 2.9 back-compat branch.
Mike
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:53 AM
Subject: svn commit: r822301 -
/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1955:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Fix Hits deprecation notice
> ---
>
>
Fix Hits deprecation notice
---
Key: LUCENE-1955
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1955
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Javadocs
Reporter: Mark Miller
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1955?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763086#action_12763086
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1955:
-
Here is what I have so far (taken from an email
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1929:
Fix Version/s: 2.9.1
> Highlighter doesn't support NumericRangeQuery or deprecated RangeQuery
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763083#action_12763083
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1257:
-
Not sure if that's the right issue, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763082#action_12763082
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1953:
-
Koji can't commit to the 2.9 branch can he? Not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1953:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
2.9.1
> FastVectorHighlighter: small fragCharSize
OK I'll remove them! It's so much fun removing stuff :) Wish we
could do this more often!
Mike
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> On 10/7/09 5:29 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Miller (JIRA)
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> it only complai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763073#action_12763073
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1856:
---
Thanks, Earwin, good catch. I'll remove the
On 10/7/09 5:29 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Miller (JIRA) wrote:
it only complained about the $id issue in wildcardtermenum
This bites me all the time.
Can we simply remove all $Id tags from the class javadocs?
+1
Those annoy me too... l
Mark, I am set up to do these tests with a large term dict. I will see
if there is any improvement.
In my opinion in general, even if the improvement is very small, if
its trivial to rewrite to a faster/simpler query, we should.
Future improvements to lucene might make the simpler query might
beco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bernd Fondermann updated LUCENE-1954:
-
Attachment: instantiated_writer_fieldable.patch
> InitiatedIndex: CCE on casting Numeric
InitiatedIndex: CCE on casting NumericField to Field
Key: LUCENE-1954
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1954
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: co
Michael McCandless wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Miller (JIRA) wrote:
>
>
>> it only complained about the $id issue in wildcardtermenum
>>
>
> This bites me all the time.
>
> Can we simply remove all $Id tags from the class javadocs? Is there
> some value to having $Id in
I cannot find "Assign this issue (to me)" link in Lucene JIRA.
Can someone help, please?
Koji
Koji Sekiguchi (JIRA) wrote:
FastVectorHighlighter: small fragCharSize can cause StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Mark Miller (JIRA) wrote:
> it only complained about the $id issue in wildcardtermenum
This bites me all the time.
Can we simply remove all $Id tags from the class javadocs? Is there
some value to having $Id in the javadocs?
It produces a line like this:
* @v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1953:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1953.patch
Patch that includes the fix and test cases. Will commit soon.
FastVectorHighlighter: small fragCharSize can cause
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
Key: LUCENE-1953
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1953
Project:
bq. I don't think the prefix enumeration is really that much faster than
the wildcard one,
We should do some tests. If it is much faster, this would be a nice
optimization. I think it could be worth it when matching a
lot of terms - never tested though.
Robert Muir wrote:
> separately, perhaps we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763020#action_12763020
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
bq. Mark is there anything wrong w/ the patch?
Me more than you. I don't know if its ext4 or 2.6.31+ext4, but commit is
slow on a my machine - making autocommit ridiculously slow.
Check out the SQLite inserts bench - the Lucene fsync stuff appears to
be similar:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=7
Mich
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763003#action_12763003
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1952:
Do you know of any automated tool
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Pilsworth updated LUCENE-1952:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> @since tags missing from Javadocs
> --
@since tags missing from Javadocs
-
Key: LUCENE-1952
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1952
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Javadocs
Reporter: C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762993#action_12762993
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1856:
-
Still some javadocs referencing Hits re
sure, I will submit a patch under LUCENE-1951.
will look around at other rewrites too just to be sure there arent others
Thanks,
Robert
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I agree, this looks like a bug (boost & constant-score-ness is lost)
> -- wanna open an issue & pat
wildcardquery rewrite improvements
--
Key: LUCENE-1951
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1951
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Query/Scoring
Repo
i think it does this already. so like i said, it would be a minor optimization.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Simon Willnauer
wrote:
> This should be handled in WildcardTermEnum instead of overriding
> MultiTermQuery#rewrite(). The WildcardTermEnum could simply return
> false in termCompare if
This should be handled in WildcardTermEnum instead of overriding
MultiTermQuery#rewrite(). The WildcardTermEnum could simply return
false in termCompare if a term is not equal to the "prefix". This
would yield consistent behaviour even if a custom RewriteMethod is
used. Right?!
simon
On Wed, Oct
Just want to confirm: is anyone (Uwe?) already working on this? If
not I'm quite happy to take it. Been looking forward to this for a
lng time :)
Mike
-- Forwarded message --
From: Michael McCandless (JIRA)
Date: Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:39 AM
Subject: [jira] Created: (LUCENE-
Remove autoCommit from IndexWriter
--
Key: LUCENE-1950
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1950
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762960#action_12762960
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
Mark is there anything wrong w/ t
+1
I think it ought to be faster? PrefixTermEnum just calls .startsWith
on each term text, but WildcardTermEnum has big hairy logic in
wildcardEquals.
Mike
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> separately, perhaps we should consider doing the prefixquery rewrite
> here for wild
I agree, this looks like a bug (boost & constant-score-ness is lost)
-- wanna open an issue & patch it?
Mike
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> someone asked this question on the user list:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/6f38de391b242102/prefixquery_vs_wildc
74 matches
Mail list logo
