[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769946#action_12769946
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
I do not know if this is a bug in 2.9.0,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769946#action_12769946
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1960 at 10/26/09 9:05 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769966#action_12769966
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1960:
bq. I do not know if this is a
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Michael Busch busch...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, if everyone else is okay with the one-time performance hit during
merge (details in LUCENE-1960), then I'm also +1 for cutting 2.9.1 tomorrow!
I think this is acceptable, but we should call it out clearly in the
In the 3.0's backwards info! In 2.9.1 all stays as usual.
I was a little bit confused this morning, because I have seen no relation
between 2.9.1 and compress removal. It was under discussion, that we may
need an update of 2.9, if we add new APIs to check for compressed fields or
something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769969#action_12769969
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
Will do!
Remove deprecated
Remove segments with all documents deleted in commit/flush/close of IndexWriter
instead of waiting until a merge occurs.
Key: LUCENE-2010
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769969#action_12769969
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1960 at 10/26/09 10:13 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769970#action_12769970
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2010:
---
There is one special case:
If you delete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769971#action_12769971
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
For this case: Should we add some testcase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769974#action_12769974
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1997:
Looking more at this, I think
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
In the 3.0's backwards info! In 2.9.1 all stays as usual.
Right :) I'll start the 2.9.1 release process...
I was a little bit confused this morning, because I have seen no relation
between 2.9.1 and compress removal. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769978#action_12769978
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1960:
bq. Should we add some testcase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769980#action_12769980
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2010:
bq. If you delete all documents
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769981#action_12769981
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
I am working on it. I already patched the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: index.29.nocfs.zip
index.29.cfs.zip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2008.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
OK I back-ported the javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770007#action_12770007
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1960:
bq. Should I commit the index
Michael McCandless wrote:
There is the debate about multi/single sort API, but that will take
time to net out, and I don't the we should block 2.9.1's bug fixes for
that...
Mike
Certainly not! A couple of those bugs are quite nasty - lets release the
relief!
--
- Mark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770011#action_12770011
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
OK. I will post new test indexes and a new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: lucene-1960-1-branch29.patch
lucene-1960-1.patch
Remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: index.29.nocfs.zip
index.29.cfs.zip
Here updated patch and ZIP
We should change the text a little bit in 2.9 because it only deprecates the
API there, it does not break in BW.
In 3.0 we should then move all deprecation removal to backwards breaks, but
this would be somehow strange.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: lucene-1960-1.patch
Small optimization.
Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: (was: lucene-1960-1.patch)
Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
I just thought it was best to move it there since it's deprecating
APIs on a dot-release (something we don't normally do according to
back-compat policy).
But I agree on trunk it should just be under API changes. OK I'll move it back.
And actually in 3.0 I don't think we need separate CHANGES
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: lucene-1960-1.patch
An additional check, that the raw merge mode is disabled for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770050#action_12770050
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1973:
---
I looked into the following:
I found something in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973 that
may need un-deprecation. Can you and Mark Miller also look into it?
I find the method is very useful to prevent users from creating
TopFieldDocCollector manually, what produced lots of confusion about the
parameters of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770054#action_12770054
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
After thinking a little bit about it:
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: index.29.nocfs.zip
index.29.cfs.zip
Remove deprecated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: lucene-1960-1-branch29.patch
lucene-1960-1.patch
Attached the new
OK, I've built release artifacts from svn rev 829846 (on the 2.9
branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.9.1changes/
Please vote to officially release these artifacts as Apache
Looks good. One thing:
In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having
-dev in the source artefact, because if someone compiles his own bin from
the artefact, it should have -dev in it, because
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Looks good. One thing:
In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
version before the release. You can see this in SVN. I am fine with having
-dev in the source artefact, because if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770091#action_12770091
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1973:
bq. Should we simply document it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770093#action_12770093
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1973:
---
Can you do it? You are the RM.
A short
Also, I really do not like the large perf hits at highish topN sizes.
Admittedly it's unusual (though I suspect not THAT rare) to use such
a large topN, but, I esepically don't like that it doesn't degrade
gracefully – it's surprising. Likewise I'd like to see with highish
number of segments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770096#action_12770096
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1973:
OK will do.
Remove deprecated
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Yonik Seeley
yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Looks good. One thing:
In Mark's artifacts, he changed the common-build.xml to not have -dev in the
version before the release. You can see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1960:
--
Attachment: lucene-1960-1.patch
Add an assertion in FieldsReader that checks, that 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 10/26/09 6:13 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770122#action_12770122
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
{quote}
I can commit this, if everybody is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770114#action_12770114
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 10/26/09 6:31 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770127#action_12770127
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
OK, will do it a later in the evening
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-1960:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler (was: Michael Busch)
Remove deprecated Field.Store.COMPRESS
OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/
Please vote to
+1
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
+1
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
+1
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1960.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Committed
OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc2_lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-
area/rc2_lucene2.9.1changes/
We need a changes entry too right?
uschind...@apache.org wrote:
Author: uschindler
Date: Mon Oct 26 22:06:40 2009
New Revision: 829995
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=829995view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-1929: Merge NumericRangeQuery tests for highlighter from 2.9 branch.
The bug was already
Done. I thought I added it to the fixing issue's changes entry.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:11 PM
To:
Well I tweaked ;) - you ended up getting that trunk fix before I got in
there.
Uwe Schindler wrote:
Done. I thought I added it to the fixing issue's changes entry.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original
By the way, as Solr updated to the latest 2.9.1 artifacts: the
SolrQueryWrapper fix for highlighter is now obsolete again?
Uwe
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 11:19 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: svn
Yup - good point. Solr 1.4 vote just started though - doubt anyone is
willing to start over for that - if something comes up, it should prob
just be removed though.
Uwe Schindler wrote:
By the way, as Solr updated to the latest 2.9.1 artifacts: the
SolrQueryWrapper fix for highlighter is now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770242#action_12770242
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Waiting for Mike's changes to try and do some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770242#action_12770242
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1997 at 10/26/09 10:35 PM:
If you want to update this, go for it. I am starting over. Let me
know.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:24 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Yup - good point. Solr 1.4 vote just started though - doubt anyone is
willing to start over for that - if something comes up, it should prob
just be removed though.
Uwe
+1
On Oct 26, 2009, at 3:48 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
+1
On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, I've built new release artifacts (incorporating Uwes feedback)
from svn rev 829889 (on the 2.9 branch), here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12770290#action_12770290
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1950:
---
Can we close this, Mike? It seems to be
61 matches
Mail list logo
