[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12771885#action_12771885
]
Cédrik LIME commented on LUCENE-2017:
-
Michael,
I wrote the class should not be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2017.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Thanks Cédrik!
CloseableThreadLocal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1997:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1997.patch
* Added inlined single PQ approach, for sorting by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2021.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 831268.
French elision filter should use CharArraySet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12771923#action_12771923
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1997:
JAVA:
java version 1.6.0_14
thanks!
by the way, depending on back compat policy we can change that javadoc
accordingly?
(not sure how it applies to contrib anyway, but whatever you think is best)
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:45 AM, mikemcc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mikemccand
Date: Fri Oct 30 12:45:11 2009
New
remove contrib deprecations
---
Key: LUCENE-2022
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2022
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: contrib/*
Reporter: Robert Muir
yeah should i change it for now to be safe?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
You mean to state that it won't be removed until 4.0?
Mike
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks!
by the way,
+1 my chinese corpus indexed fine this time :)
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
OK, let's try this again!
I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:
OK!
Mike
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah should i change it for now to be safe?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
You mean to state that it won't be removed until 4.0?
Mike
On Fri, Oct 30,
Improve performance of SmartChineseAnalyzer
---
Key: LUCENE-2023
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2023:
Attachment: LUCENE-2023.patch
Improve performance of SmartChineseAnalyzer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2023:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
Improve performance of SmartChineseAnalyzer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772003#action_12772003
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
If we have a 2.9.2 release, can this be there too?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772013#action_12772013
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
DM, personally I don't see the slowness as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772022#action_12772022
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
I fully understand that at some point, just say no.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772023#action_12772023
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
How long are you stuck on 1.4 DM :) You guys
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772048#action_12772048
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2022:
-
Committed revision 831425
thanks Michael.
does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib already
(see contrib/CHANGES),
but I don't too much care either way, if I should not be adding this feature
to 3.0, I'd like to set the version in jira to 3.1
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772050#action_12772050
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
Robert,
You have in BigramDictionary:
{code}
public
I don't see any reason to freeze new contributions from any release.
On 10/30/2009 03:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
thanks Michael.
does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib
already (see contrib/CHANGES),
but I don't too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772054#action_12772054
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
hi DM,
i think the bounds checks are redundant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2023:
Attachment: LUCENE-2023.patch
change these redundant bounds checks to assertions as DM observed.
I have no problem with new features either - but I would vote that if it
requires new deprecations, it should wait.
I think its nice to have a clean release first. And I also don't think
any of this features should hold up the 3.0 release. Lets get it out -
then focus on new features.
Grant
Grant, in this case the new contribution does not require any deprecation,
it is another implementation for regex and wildcard query that works a bit
differently than the others.
Not to stray off-topic, but your comment does apply to
RussianLowerCaseFilter, which is currently marked deprecated in
by the way, this russian example is only one I'm familiar with, its hardly
the only new deprecation introduced in 3.0
theres been other new features added to contrib in 3.0, and theres been
other new deprecations added to contrib in 3.0
I saw this when I started trying to clear out the contrib
well, not to complain, but I will mention on this topic.
If something is marked deprecated, its 10x easier if in the javadocs there
is some version information applied.
In the wild west that is contrib, its currently a bit difficult for me to
clear out the deprecations from 2.9, because there
What deprecations were already added?
Robert Muir wrote:
well, not to complain, but I will mention on this topic.
If something is marked deprecated, its 10x easier if in the javadocs
there is some version information applied.
In the wild west that is contrib, its currently a bit difficult
I don't want to come across as negative here... i'm not trying to single
anyone out,
just a bit confused as to why my issue was singled out when theres already
been both new features and new deprecations added to 3.0,
and the issue in question doesnt even have any deprecations. then again i
don't
Negative shcmegative :)
Your right - this needs to be handled better. If we are going to add new
deprecations before all of the old deprecations are removed, there needs
to be help in the javadocs.
Of course its nothing against those that did it - they likely didn't see
this issue - I don't
Mea culpa ;) (on LUCENE-1781)
And I agree we need a better solution in general. I think not
deprecating new stuff until the .0 release is out seems best? I think
this .0 release is also especially challenging because we're (well,
Uwe and a few others -- thanks)'re taking advantage of 1.5's new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772104#action_12772104
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2019:
The patch looks good, and is
definitely wasn't trying to single you out, again.
besides, this isn't the only instance. just the one that i could remember.
I'll set LUCENE-1606 to 3.1, even tho it doesn't deprecate anything, lets
focus on clearing this shit up and making a clean 3.0 release.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2005:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Add LuSql project to Apache Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772106#action_12772106
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2005:
Thanks Glen and Robert!
Add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2005.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Add LuSql project to Apache Lucene -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772110#action_12772110
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Michael, well if we go by the unicode standard:
I don't think this is really an IOException? IOException should be
for things IO related... eg your disk filled up, something's wrong
with the filesystem, permissions are wrong, etc.
Whereas this exception is trying to tell you hey, you interrupted me,
so, I stopped.
Also, I don't think it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772118#action_12772118
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Lucene indexes can be used both
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772120#action_12772120
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
bq. If people want to use internal-use-only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772121#action_12772121
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Steven, the only reason I might disagree is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772125#action_12772125
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
If someone purposefully hands lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772128#action_12772128
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Yonik, no. this is how i see it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772128#action_12772128
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 10:30 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772133#action_12772133
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. Steven, the only reason I might disagree is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772135#action_12772135
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. I strongly disagree with the assumption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772138#action_12772138
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
Here's a process-internal use-case (as I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772142#action_12772142
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Yonik, i argue in your process-internal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772146#action_12772146
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
bq. process-internal is somethign that won't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772142#action_12772142
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 10:47 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772147#action_12772147
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. And if I'm indexing to a RAM directory? The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772147#action_12772147
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 10:53 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772151#action_12772151
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. process-internal is somethign that won't be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772153#action_12772153
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Steven, I argue that your quote from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772154#action_12772154
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
i guess the final thing I will say, is the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772164#action_12772164
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Lucene is not an application.
Again, quoting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772170#action_12772170
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Steven, yes you are arguing the interchange
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772174#action_12772174
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. if you disagree with this patch, then you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772180#action_12772180
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. So you think that enforcing consistency is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772180#action_12772180
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 11:41 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772184#action_12772184
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. by disallowing all noncharacters as term
+1
Michael
On 10/29/09 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, let's try this again!
I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772211#action_12772211
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
{quote}
Steven, by the way, I think something i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772214#action_12772214
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. Robert, you are a proponent of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12772215#action_12772215
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2019:
---
... the same with trie (numeric) fields ...
66 matches
Mail list logo
