[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772215#action_12772215
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2019:
---
... the same with trie (numeric) fields ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772214#action_12772214
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. Robert, you are a proponent of the (ICU)Col
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772211#action_12772211
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
{quote}
Steven, by the way, I think something i
+1
Michael
On 10/29/09 4:27 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, let's try this again!
I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
branch), here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc3_lucene2.9.1/
Changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772184#action_12772184
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. by disallowing all noncharacters as term te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772180#action_12772180
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 11:41 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772180#action_12772180
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. So you think that enforcing consistency is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772174#action_12772174
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. if you disagree with this patch, then you s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772170#action_12772170
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Steven, yes you are arguing the interchange par
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772164#action_12772164
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Lucene is not an application.
Again, quoting f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772154#action_12772154
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
i guess the final thing I will say, is the inco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772153#action_12772153
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Steven, I argue that your quote from the standa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772151#action_12772151
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. process-internal is somethign that won't be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772147#action_12772147
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 10:53 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772147#action_12772147
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. And if I'm indexing to a RAM directory? The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772142#action_12772142
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 10:47 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772146#action_12772146
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
bq. process-internal is somethign that won't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772142#action_12772142
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Yonik, i argue in your process-internal usecase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772138#action_12772138
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
Here's a process-internal use-case (as I unde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772135#action_12772135
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. I strongly disagree with the assumption tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772133#action_12772133
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
bq. Steven, the only reason I might disagree is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772128#action_12772128
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2019 at 10/30/09 10:30 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772128#action_12772128
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Yonik, no. this is how i see it.
process-inter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772125#action_12772125
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
If someone purposefully hands lucene internal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772121#action_12772121
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Steven, the only reason I might disagree is tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772120#action_12772120
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2019:
--
bq. If people want to use internal-use-only c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772118#action_12772118
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Lucene indexes can be used both process-interna
I don't think this is really an IOException? IOException should be
for things IO related... eg your disk filled up, something's wrong
with the filesystem, permissions are wrong, etc.
Whereas this exception is trying to tell you "hey, you interrupted me,
so, I stopped".
Also, I don't think it's g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772110#action_12772110
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2019:
-
Michael, well if we go by the unicode standard:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2005.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
> Add LuSql project to "Apache Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772106#action_12772106
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2005:
Thanks Glen and Robert!
> Add Lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2005:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Add LuSql project to "Apache Lucene - Contribut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
> Automaton Query/Filter (scalable regex)
> -
definitely wasn't trying to single you out, again.
besides, this isn't the only instance. just the one that i could remember.
I'll set LUCENE-1606 to 3.1, even tho it doesn't deprecate anything, lets
focus on clearing this shit up and making a clean 3.0 release.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:30 PM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772104#action_12772104
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2019:
The patch looks good, and is non-
Mea culpa ;) (on LUCENE-1781)
And I agree we need a better solution in general. I think not
deprecating new stuff until the .0 release is out seems best? I think
this .0 release is also especially challenging because we're (well,
Uwe and a few others -- thanks)'re taking advantage of 1.5's new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1781:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.0
Correcting fix version.
> Larg
Negative shcmegative :)
Your right - this needs to be handled better. If we are going to add new
deprecations before all of the old deprecations are removed, there needs
to be help in the javadocs.
Of course its nothing against those that did it - they likely didn't see
this issue - I don't think
I don't want to come across as negative here... i'm not trying to single
anyone out,
just a bit confused as to why my issue was singled out when theres already
been both new features and new deprecations added to 3.0,
and the issue in question doesnt even have any deprecations. then again i
don't r
What deprecations were already added?
Robert Muir wrote:
> well, not to complain, but I will mention on this topic.
>
> If something is marked deprecated, its 10x easier if in the javadocs
> there is some version information applied.
>
> In the wild west that is contrib, its currently a bit diffic
well, not to complain, but I will mention on this topic.
If something is marked deprecated, its 10x easier if in the javadocs there
is some version information applied.
In the wild west that is contrib, its currently a bit difficult for me to
clear out the deprecations from 2.9, because there are
by the way, this russian example is only one I'm familiar with, its hardly
the only new deprecation introduced in 3.0
theres been other new features added to contrib in 3.0, and theres been
other new deprecations added to contrib in 3.0
I saw this when I started trying to clear out the contrib de
Grant, in this case the new contribution does not require any deprecation,
it is another implementation for regex and wildcard query that works a bit
differently than the others.
Not to stray off-topic, but your comment does apply to
RussianLowerCaseFilter, which is currently marked deprecated in
I have no problem with new features either - but I would vote that if it
requires new deprecations, it should wait.
I think its nice to have a clean release first. And I also don't think
any of this features should hold up the 3.0 release. Lets get it out -
then focus on new features.
Grant Inger
How do you handle deprecations of old stuff for the new contribution
(assuming it needs it)? Seems weird to have a major release that
immediately has deprecations. At the same time, it seems weird to
have a major release that doesn't contain new features. If anything,
it is our best oppo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2023:
Attachment: LUCENE-2023.patch
change these redundant bounds checks to assertions as DM observed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772054#action_12772054
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
hi DM,
i think the bounds checks are redundant
I don't see any reason to freeze new contributions from any release.
On 10/30/2009 03:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
thanks Michael.
does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib
already (see contrib/CHANGES),
but I don't too much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772050#action_12772050
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
Robert,
You have in BigramDictionary:
{code}
public
thanks Michael.
does anyone else have any opinion on this issue?
fyi we already have several new features committed to 3.0 contrib already
(see contrib/CHANGES),
but I don't too much care either way, if I should not be adding this feature
to 3.0, I'd like to set the version in jira to 3.1
On Fri,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772048#action_12772048
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2022:
-
Committed revision 831425 (LUCENE_2022_analysis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772045#action_12772045
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2022:
-
i think this analysis stuff is obvious. I will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772034#action_12772034
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
Thanks, Mark.
I'm stuck with 1.4 for the near future
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772027#action_12772027
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
well, i'm more than willing to do the backport,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772023#action_12772023
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
How long are you stuck on 1.4 DM :) You guys ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772022#action_12772022
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
I fully understand that at some point, "just say no."
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772013#action_12772013
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2023:
-
DM, personally I don't see the slowness as a bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12772003#action_12772003
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2023:
--
If we have a 2.9.2 release, can this be there too?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2023:
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Improve performance of SmartChineseAnalyzer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2023:
Attachment: LUCENE-2023.patch
> Improve performance of SmartChineseAnalyzer
>
Improve performance of SmartChineseAnalyzer
---
Key: LUCENE-2023
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2023
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib/anal
OK!
Mike
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> yeah should i change it for now to be safe?
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>>
>> You mean to state that it won't be removed until 4.0?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Robert Muir
+1 my chinese corpus indexed fine this time :)
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> OK, let's try this again!
>
> I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 831145 (on the 2.9
> branch), here:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/sta
yeah should i change it for now to be safe?
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> You mean to state that it won't be removed until 4.0?
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> > thanks!
> >
> > by the way, depending
You mean to state that it won't be removed until 4.0?
Mike
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> thanks!
>
> by the way, depending on back compat policy we can change that javadoc
> accordingly?
> (not sure how it applies to contrib anyway, but whatever you think is best)
>
> On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2022?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2022:
Attachment: LUCENE_2022_analysis_wikipedia.patch
patch for analysis and wikipedia (the ones i feel
remove contrib deprecations
---
Key: LUCENE-2022
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2022
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: contrib/*
Reporter: Robert Muir
thanks!
by the way, depending on back compat policy we can change that javadoc
accordingly?
(not sure how it applies to contrib anyway, but whatever you think is best)
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 8:45 AM, wrote:
> Author: mikemccand
> Date: Fri Oct 30 12:45:11 2009
> New Revision: 831284
>
> URL: h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12771923#action_12771923
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1997:
JAVA:
java version "1.6.0_14"
Jav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2021?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2021.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 831268.
> French elision filter should use CharArraySet
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1997:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1997.patch
* Added inlined single PQ approach, for sorting by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2017.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Thanks Cédrik!
> CloseableThreadLocal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12771893#action_12771893
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2017:
OK, no problem... I'll sharpen th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12771885#action_12771885
]
Cédrik LIME commented on LUCENE-2017:
-
Michael,
I wrote the class should not be close
74 matches
Mail list logo
