Hudson build is back to normal: Lucene-trunk #1008

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2052) Scan method signatures and add varargs where possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2052: Attachment: LUCENE-2052_fa.patch uwe, here is one i found that got skipped in LUCENE-1987 > Scan

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2065) Java 5 port phase II

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kay Kay updated LUCENE-2065: Fix Version/s: 3.1 > Java 5 port phase II > - > > Key: LUCENE-2065 >

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2065) Java 5 port phase II

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kay Kay updated LUCENE-2065: Attachment: LUCENE-2065.patch across src/test > Java 5 port phase II > - > >

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2066) Add Highlighter test for RegexQuery

Add Highlighter test for RegexQuery --- Key: LUCENE-2066 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2066 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: contrib/highlighter

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1281#action_1281 ] Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2064 at 11/14/09 1:05 AM: -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1282#action_1282 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2064: - Nice Uwe! - good idea. > Highlighter should su

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1281#action_1281 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2064: - bq. Introducing dependencies on other contribs

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2064: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2064.patch Here the solution with empty MemoryIndex. This seems to be the q

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1276#action_1276 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2064: - As I said, thinking about it, I don't think we

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1274#action_1274 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2064: --- bq. I agree with the exception, but which r

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2047) IndexWriter should immediately resolve deleted docs to docID in near-real-time mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1273#action_1273 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047: -- Also, if the per SR delete queue were

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1269#action_1269 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2064: - As I stated above, i see this as a neat

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1264#action_1264 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2064: - bq. Or simply use the passed in reader

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1262#action_1262 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2064: - I still think getFields on multitermquery is a

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1256#action_1256 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2064 at 11/14/09 12:12 AM: --

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1256#action_1256 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2064: --- One comment to the patch: If a MTQ subclass

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2064: -- Summary: Highlighter should support all MultiTermQuery subclasses without casts (was: Highlig

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1589) IndexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize(IndexReader... readers)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1589: -- Summary: IndexWriter.addIndexesNoOptimize(IndexReader... readers) (was: IndexWriter.addIndexe

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2052) Scan method signatures and add varargs where possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2052: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2052.patch Updated patch, as there may be a backwards comp problem (but onl

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1488) multilingual analyzer based on icu

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1488: Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) Fix Version/s: 3.1 Assignee: Rober

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2052) Scan method signatures and add varargs where possible

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2052: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2052.patch Here a patch that adds more varargs where it makes sense (e.g. M

Re: Junit4

OK thanks for adding me to the ACL. I'll have it tomorrow sometime. Does anyone object to deprecating LuceneTestCase with notations to use LuceneTestCaseJ4? I tried two approaches, both work. Both allow you to use LuceneTestCaseJ4 rather than LuceneTestCase as a superclass, with the caveat you hav

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1257) Port to Java5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1231#action_1231 ] Kay Kay commented on LUCENE-1257: - | Further updates of tests and internal APIs may follo

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2065) Java 5 port phase II

Java 5 port phase II - Key: LUCENE-2065 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2065 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 3.1 Environment: Java 5 Reporter:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1217#action_1217 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2064: - It is clever - personally I think I'd prefer th

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1214#action_1214 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2064: --- bq. I think there was some discussion on th

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777686#action_12777686 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2064 at 11/13/09 10:42 PM: --

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2064: -- Comment: was deleted (was: This is cool. Highlighter & MTQ is broken in 2.9.1 - why not put t

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2064: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1) 3.0 Sorry I was somehow like completely drunk

Re: Junit4

: putting too many irons in the fire, especially non-critical ones. I don't : see a way to assign it to myself, either I'm missing something or I'm just : underprivileged , so if someone would go ahead and assign it to me I'll : work on it post 3.0. Jira's ACLs prevent issues from being assigned t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777686#action_12777686 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2064: --- This is cool. Highlighter & MTQ is broken

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2037) Allow Junit4 tests in our environment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man reassigned LUCENE-2037: Assignee: Erick Erickson It's all yours Erick. > Allow Junit4 tests in our environment. > ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777684#action_12777684 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2064: - Uwe, I agree, I think you should set to 3.0 I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777682#action_12777682 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2064: --- This is cool. Highlighter & MTQ is broken

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2039) Regex support and beyond in JavaCC QueryParser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777667#action_12777667 ] Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-2039: -- {quote} This is pretty much what I su

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2063) Use thread pool in ConcurrentMergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777666#action_12777666 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2063: -- Right, this isn't the highest priorit

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2064: Attachment: LUCENE-2064.txt This is the patch - please let me know if I miss something esp

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2064) Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts

Highlighter should support all MultiFieldQuery subclasses without casts --- Key: LUCENE-2064 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2064 Project: Lucene - Java Is

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2063) Use thread pool in ConcurrentMergeScheduler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777645#action_12777645 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2063: - One of the issues with this is that the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2047) IndexWriter should immediately resolve deleted docs to docID in near-real-time mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777638#action_12777638 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047: -- bq. It's strange that anything here i

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2063) Use thread pool in ConcurrentMergeScheduler

Use thread pool in ConcurrentMergeScheduler --- Key: LUCENE-2063 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2063 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Index Af

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2062) Bulgarian Analyzer

Bulgarian Analyzer -- Key: LUCENE-2062 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2062 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: contrib/analyzers Reporter: Robert Muir

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2062) Bulgarian Analyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2062: Attachment: LUCENE-2062.patch > Bulgarian Analyzer > -- > > Key: L

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2024. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision: 835889 Thanks @ all! On ApacheCon, the others told me

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777530#action_12777530 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2024: OK looks like hudson is using ant

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2061) Create benchmark & approach for testing Lucene's near real-time performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2061: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2061.patch Attached first cut python script nrtBench.py. You hav

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777519#action_12777519 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2024: --- bq. But: what version is installed on hudso

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2061) Create benchmark & approach for testing Lucene's near real-time performance

Create benchmark & approach for testing Lucene's near real-time performance --- Key: LUCENE-2061 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2061 Project: Lucene - Java

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777517#action_12777517 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2024: bq. Mark/Mike, can you test this

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2024: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2024.patch The file output pattern needs ANT 1.7.0. Attached is a patch tha

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2050) Improve contrib/benchmark for testing near-real-time search performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2050: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2050.patch Woops, last patch was missing added files -- this one

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2050) Improve contrib/benchmark for testing near-real-time search performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2050: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2050.patch Patch attached. I think it's ready to commit. I also

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2060) CMS should default its maxThreadCount to 1 (not 3)

CMS should default its maxThreadCount to 1 (not 3) -- Key: LUCENE-2060 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2060 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2024: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2024.patch Here a patch that uses the most recent checksum task. I have to

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2024) "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifacts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2024: - Assignee: Uwe Schindler > "ant dist" no longer generates md5's for the top-level artifac

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1257) Port to Java5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1257. --- Resolution: Fixed Closed for 3.0. Further updates of tests and internal APIs may follow for

RE: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

Oh I see: The checksum task in ant now supports also the filename inside md5 file: http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTasks/checksum.html use property "format" - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > F

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2039) Regex support and beyond in JavaCC QueryParser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777465#action_12777465 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2039: - Luis, {quote} syntax: extension

RE: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > > I cannot reproduce it here, too (Sol, Win32). By the way, you modified > the > > test in trunk to be more verbose, but the failing one was in test-tag > (but > > the tests are identical). > > I'll add verbosity on BW branch, but not cut

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2053) When thread is interrupted we should throw a clear exception

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2053: --- Attachment: LUCENE-2053.patch Attached patch. > When thread is interrupted we shoul

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

Same here - worked for maven , not for others. Was on Linux. - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile) On Nov 13, 2009, at 5:58 AM, Michael McCandless > wrote: On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: I cannot reproduce it here, too (Sol, Win32). By the way, you modifi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1257) Port to Java5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777454#action_12777454 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1257: - We gonna reopen it in 3.0 anyway so jus

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1257) Port to Java5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777449#action_12777449 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1257: - bq. If we find further Java5 conversions after

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I cannot reproduce it here, too (Sol, Win32). By the way, you modified the > test in trunk to be more verbose, but the failing one was in test-tag (but > the tests are identical). I'll add verbosity on BW branch, but not cut a new tag. > I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2051) Contrib Analyzer Setters should be deprecated and replace with ctor arguments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777445#action_12777445 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2051: - This would also include deprecating som

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

I tried to reproduce the error on 64 bit / 32 bit linux (gentoo / ubuntu) no failure here too. I also run it on different JVMs 1.5, 1.6 no result :( simon On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > Hurm, this was the failure: > >    [junit] Testcase: > testMaxBufferedDocsCh

RE: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

I cannot reproduce it here, too (Sol, Win32). By the way, you modified the test in trunk to be more verbose, but the failing one was in test-tag (but the tests are identical). I got the release artefact build process running, files look good here. On my solaris box with ant 1.7.0 also all md5 hash

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2047) IndexWriter should immediately resolve deleted docs to docID in near-real-time mode

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777436#action_12777436 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2047: {quote} we'd need to prevent the

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1007

Hurm, this was the failure: [junit] Testcase: testMaxBufferedDocsChange(org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMergePolicy): FAILED [junit] null [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError [junit] at org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterMergePolicy.checkInvariants(TestInde

Re: 3.0 or 3.0.0 version number

It should be 3.0.0, I think? Mike On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: > I looked into the archive; we are quite inconsequent with release artifact > version numbers. Should I call the next release 3.0.0 or 3.0 ? > > Uwe > > - > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213

3.0 or 3.0.0 version number

I looked into the archive; we are quite inconsequent with release artifact version numbers. Should I call the next release 3.0.0 or 3.0 ? Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1257) Port to Java5

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12777419#action_12777419 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1257: --- Robert: Is there anything else in contrib t