to reduce the number of iterations -- just make sure
there's no seed to newRandom() so the distributing testing is
effective.
Mike
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I've noticed that TestCodecs takes an insanely long time to run on my
machine
SDP throws NPE if the index includes no commits, but snapshot() is called.
This is an extreme case, but can happen if one takes snapshots (for backup
purposes for example) in a separate code segment than indexing, and does not
know if commit was called or not.
I think we should throw an
:
We should just let IW create a null commit on an empty directory, like
it always did ;)
Then a whole class of such problems disappears.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:16, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
SDP throws NPE if the index includes no commits, but snapshot() is
called
for this.
The question of what to call major release in X.Y.Z scheme - X or Y,
is there, but immaterial :) I think it's okay to settle with X.Y, we
have major releases and bugfixes, what that third number can be used
for?
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:29, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
So then I don't
ear...@gmail.comwrote:
We should just let IW create a null commit on an empty directory, like
it always did ;)
Then a whole class of such problems disappears.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:16, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
SDP throws NPE if the index includes no commits, but snapshot
structure back-support.
Shai
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
2010/4/15 Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com:
One way is to define 'major' as X and minor X.Y, and another is to define
major as 'X.Y' and minor as 'X.Y.Z'. I prefer the latter but don't
:57, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Well ... I must say that I completely disagree w/ dropping index
structure back-support. Our customers will simply not hear of reindexing 10s
of TBs of content because of version
15, 2010 at 14:57, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Well ... I must say that I completely disagree w/ dropping index
structure back-support. Our customers will simply not hear of
reindexing 10s
of TBs of content
:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well ... I must say that I completely disagree w/ dropping index
structure back-support. Our customers will simply not hear of
reindexing 10s
of TBs of content because of version upgrades. Such a decision is
key to
Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12857388#action_12857388
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2396:
Robert I think this is great! Can we move more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12857396#action_12857396
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2396:
Static? Weren't you against that!?
But if we
I seriously don't understand the fuss around index format back compat.
How many times is this changed such that it is too much to ask to keep
X support X-1?
I prefer to have ongoing segment merging but can live w/ a manual
converter tool. Thing is - I'll probably not be able to develop one
myself
The reason Earwin why online migration is faster is because when u
finally need to *fully* migrate your index, most chances are that most
of the segments are already on the newer format. Offline migration
will just keep the application idle for some amount of time until ALL
segments are migrated.
+1 on the Analyzers as well.
Earwin, I think I don't mind if we introduce migrate() elsewhere rather than
on IW. What I meant to say is that if we stick w/ index format back-compat
and ongoing migration, then such a method would be useful on IW for
customers to call to ensure they're on the
tool for the latest
index format version. Simple as that. The rest, we can 'see what happens'
...
Shai
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
+1 on the Analyzers as well.
Earwin, I think I don't mind if we
at 11:33 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, I'd like to know if people like Robert (basically those who have
no problem to reindex and don't understand the fuss around it) will want to
change the index format
now.
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert ... I'm sorry but changes to Analyzers don't *force* people to
reindex. They can simply choose not to use the latest version. They can
choose not to upgrade a Unicode version. They can copy the entire Analyzer
control we have on that ...
Shai
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:21 AM, DM Smith dmsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
Robert ... I'm sorry but changes to Analyzers don't *force* people to
reindex. They can simply choose not to use the latest version
Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Shai Erera
Assignee: Shai Erera
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
SDP throws NPE if no commits occurred and snapshot() was called. I will replace
it w/ throwing IllegalStateException. I'll also move
DB jars again ... I think this one is a false alarm.
Shai
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Apache Hudson Server
hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org wrote:
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/1157/changes
Changes:
[mikemccand] speed up TestStressIndexing2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2316.
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Assignee: Shai Erera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856845#action_12856845
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2159:
This looks like a nice tool. But all it does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856877#action_12856877
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2159:
bq. I understand having a general performance
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856911#action_12856911
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2159:
Which is fine - I think this would be a neat task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856917#action_12856917
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2159:
bq. There is an excellent section on it in LIA2
Ahh ... a dream finally comes true ... what a great way to start a day :).
+1 !!!
I have some questions/comments though:
* Index back compat should be maintained between major releases, like it is
today, STRUCTURE-wise. So apps get a chance to incrementally upgrade their
segments when they move
Also, we will still need to maintain the Backwards section in CHANGES (or
move it to API Changes), to help people upgrade from release to release.
Just pointing that out as well.
Shai
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh ... a dream finally comes true
://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Ahh ... a dream finally comes true ... what a great way to start a day :).
+1 !!!
I have some questions/comments though:
* Index back compat should be maintained between major releases, like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2386.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 933613. (take #2)
IndexWriter commits unnecessarily
Hi
I'd like to propose a relaxation on the Version API. Uwe, please read the
entire email before you reply :).
I was thinking, following a question on the user list, that the
Version-based API may not be very intuitive to users, especially those who
don't care about versioning, as well as very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2316:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2316.patch
Patch clarifies the contract, fixes the directories to adhere
Well the no-arg ctor will be using Version.getDefault() which will
throw an exception if not set, and delegate the call to the
Version-aware ctor.
On Tuesday, April 13, 2010, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
I
, this type of thing
makes web applications no longer isolated. This is also a general contract
for libraries: never ever rely on sysprops or statics.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
*From:* Shai Erera
.
-- DM
On 04/13/2010 11:27 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Hi
I'd like to propose a relaxation on the Version API. Uwe, please read the
entire email before you reply :).
I was thinking, following a question on the user list, that the
Version-based API may not be very intuitive to users, especially those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855870#action_12855870
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
I'm not sure if we're arguing about the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855873#action_12855873
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2316:
Well ... dir.fileLength is also used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855875#action_12855875
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2392:
Mike - it'll also be great if we can store
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855877#action_12855877
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2373:
I'd rather not count on file length as well
into the index (this would be messy like how to get access to the aggregates
you need anyway) is something different entirely, best left to research
systems.
You can't even do that with Terrier now.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Shai Erera (JIRA) j...@apache.orgwrote:
[
https
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855892#action_12855892
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
bq. what is the proper way (after this fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855913#action_12855913
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2392:
I'd like to withdraw my request from above. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855924#action_12855924
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
I don't think that people need to write
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856063#action_12856063
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
So just call new IW(), then rollback and ensure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2386:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2386.patch
Patch includes the proposed test in TestIndexWriter. I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2386.
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855713#action_12855713
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1709:
Committed revision 932878 with the following
Sorry about that ...
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, uschind...@apache.org wrote:
Author: uschindler
Date: Sun Apr 11 12:10:57 2010
New Revision: 932873
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=932873view=rev
Log:
add missing license header
Modified:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855727#action_12855727
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
Committed revision 932917 for the revert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2386:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2386.patch
Fixes IndexFileDeleter, adds a proper test to TestIndexWriter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855767#action_12855767
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
About IndexReader.listCommits ... the javadocs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2386:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2386.patch
Patch w/ proposed fixes. All tests pass, including Solr's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2386:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2386.patch
Patch updated to latest rev. + the proposed name change
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855344#action_12855344
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
Ok I've added the following to DirReader:
{code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855369#action_12855369
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
I already did that ... just didn't post back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855379#action_12855379
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1879:
I have found such version ... and it fails too
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2386:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2386.patch
Patch fixes all tests as well as changes to IndexWriter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855457#action_12855457
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
Ok sounds good. Is there a preferred package
Hi
I've noticed benchmark has a NoDeletionPolicy class and I was wondering if
we can move it to core. I might want to use it for the parallel index stuff,
but I think it'll also fit nicely in core, together with the other No*
classes. In addition, this class should be made a singleton.
If moving
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854885#action_12854885
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2074:
Uwe, must this be coupled with that issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854887#action_12854887
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2074:
bq. I plan to commit this soon!
That's great
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854920#action_12854920
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1482:
I still think that calling isDebugEnabled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855020#action_12855020
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1709:
Robert, I will commit the patch, seems good to do
/benchmark, Index
Reporter: Shai Erera
Assignee: Shai Erera
Priority: Trivial
Fix For: 3.1
As the subject says, but I'll also make it a singleton + add some unit tests,
as well as some documentation. I'll post a patch hopefully today
: Index
Reporter: Shai Erera
Assignee: Shai Erera
Fix For: 3.1
I've noticed IndexWriter's ctor commits a first commit (empty one) if a fresh
Directory is passed, w/ OpenMode.CREATE or CREATE_OR_APPEND. This seems
unnecessarily, and kind of brings back
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2385:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2385.patch
Move NoDeletionPolicy to core, adds javadocs + TestNoDeletionPolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855131#action_12855131
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
Took a look at IndexFileDeleter, and located
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855140#action_12855140
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2385:
I did that first, but then remembered that when I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855148#action_12855148
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
Looking at IFD again, I think a boolean ctor arg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2385:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2385.patch
Is it better now?
Move NoDeletionPolicy from benchmark to core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855155#action_12855155
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2385:
Forgot to mention that the only move I made
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2385.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 932129.
Move NoDeletionPolicy from benchmark to core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2386:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2386.patch
First stab at this. Patch still missing CHANGES entry, and I haven't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855265#action_12855265
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
bq. Maybe change testImmediateDiskFull to set max
Hi
I've noticed that TestCodecs takes an insanely long time to run on my
machine - between 35-40 seconds. Is that expected?
The reason why it runs so long, seems to be that its threads make (each)
4000 iterations ... is that really required to ensure correctness?
Shai
I'm not sure .. but did you set the RAMBufferSizeMB on IWC? Doesn't look
like it, and the default is 16 MB, which can explain why it doesn't flush
before that.
Shai
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is a Java unit test that uses the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855277#action_12855277
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2386:
Apparently, there are more tests that fail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1709:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1709-2.patch
Since I had the changes on my local env. I thought it's best
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2377.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 931502.
Enable the use of NoMergePolicy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854588#action_12854588
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2353:
Actually, we've reopened LUCENE-1709 to track
How often is fsync called? If it's just during calls to commit, then is that
that expensive? I mean, how often do you call commit?
If that's that expensive (do you have some numbers to share) then I think
that's be a neat idea. Though losing a few minutes worth of updates may
sometimes be
Earwin - do you have some numbers to share on the running time of the
indexing application? You've mentioned that if you take out fsync into a BG
thread, the running time improves, but I'm curious to know by how much.
Shai
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854348#action_12854348
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1709:
One more thing - change benchmark tests to run
: Improvement
Components: contrib/benchmark
Reporter: Shai Erera
Assignee: Shai Erera
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
Benchmark allows one to set the MP and MS to use, by defining the class name
and then use reflection to instantiate them
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2377:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2377.patch
Patch includes both fix to CreateIndexTask as well as relevant tests
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'd like to summarize a discussion I had w/ Robert and Mike last night on
IRC, about the parallelism of tasks in Benchmark:
For some reason, ever since parallel tasks were introduced, when I run 'ant
test' from
bq. Try a merge back: This would let flex appear as a single commit to
trunk, so the history of trunk would be preserved.
+1 for that - I think the history of trunk is important to preserve.
And there is also a way to ask for flex's history so everybody win?
Shai
On Thursday, April 1, 2010,
Congratulations Uwe !
Shai
On Thursday, April 1, 2010, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
Generics SpecOps made it to the top and are gonna rule us from the
shadows :) Congrats!
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 16:37, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats Uwe!
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851829#action_12851829
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310:
+1 for this simplification. Can we just name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera reassigned LUCENE-2353:
--
Assignee: Shai Erera
Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851836#action_12851836
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2353:
Unless there are objections, I plan to commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851842#action_12851842
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2310:
Right Earwin - agreed.
I'd like to summarize
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-2353.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 929520.
Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute
Hi
I'd like to summarize a discussion I had w/ Robert and Mike last night on
IRC, about the parallelism of tasks in Benchmark:
For some reason, ever since parallel tasks were introduced, when I run 'ant
test' from the contrib/benchmark folder (or the root), the tests just hang
at some point,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2353:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2353.patch
Updated to also match 'c:/temp' like paths, which are also accepted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850644#action_12850644
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2353:
I don't have an account yet, so I cannot commit
: contrib/benchmark
Reporter: Shai Erera
Fix For: 3.1
I have no idea how no one ran into this so far, but I tried to execute an .alg
file which used ReutersContentSource and referenced both docs.dir and work.dir
as Windows absolute pathnames (e.g. d:\something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2353:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2353.patch
The fix is only relevant to get(String, String) and not to all other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850075#action_12850075
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2345:
Earwin, w/o knowing too much about the details
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850083#action_12850083
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2345:
Thanks Uwe, I know that ctor is the preferred way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850086#action_12850086
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2215:
Sure let's wait for the patch and some perf
1 - 100 of 1091 matches
Mail list logo
