[jira] Created: (LUCENE-810) provide a isClosed() method in Searcher class

2007-02-22 Thread mohammad norouzi (JIRA)
provide a isClosed() method in Searcher class - Key: LUCENE-810 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-810 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: Search

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)
Public API inconsistency Key: LUCENE-811 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Index Affects Versions: 2.1 Environment: 2.1.0

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-794) Beginnings of a span based highlighter

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475002 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-794: I have a patch coming tonight. It fixes a few odd mistakes and has a little

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Matthias Kerkhoff (JIRA)
Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass} --- Key: LUCENE-812 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCE

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-812: - Assignee: Michael McCandless > Unable to set LockFactory implementation via > ${

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475096 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-812: --- The no-argument constructors for Native/SimpleFSLockFactory w

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475104 ] Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-811: - Rather I think we should consider making SegmentInfos package-private agai

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-811: - Assignee: Michael McCandless > Public API inconsistency > ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475121 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-811: --- Indeed I did this as part of LUCENE-701, but I can't remember

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475124 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-811: --- Sorry, make that 2.1.1 above! > Public API inconsistency > --

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475130 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-812: - I'm not sure if i understand what the bug is ... as far as i can tell, LockFactor

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475132 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-811: - since SegmentInfos is final, and all of it's methods are (at best) package protec

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475138 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-812: --- Actually it was your response to the original proposal for the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-810) provide a isClosed() method in Searcher class

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475141 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-810: - please consult the java-user mailing list with questions for discussion before op

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-810) provide a isClosed() method in Searcher class

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man resolved LUCENE-810. - Resolution: Won't Fix > provide a isClosed() method in Searcher class > -

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475150 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-812: - > Actually it was your response to the original proposal for the LockFactory > ch

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Matthias Kerkhoff (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475151 ] Matthias Kerkhoff commented on LUCENE-812: -- >From the perspective of Lucene user I would like to add ... - i

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-812) Unable to set LockFactory implementation via ${org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectoryLockFactoryClass}

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475168 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-812: --- > I just entered this issue as I thought that the behaviour of

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-811: -- Attachment: LUCENE-811.patch Attaching proposed patch to change SegmentInfos (and all o

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread robert engels
I think the getters need to be public, as it makes many of the 'cache by segment' code much cleaner. Currently I cannot subclass and must replace the class in the jar because I need access to much o this information. Is there some reason not to make the getters be public, (or copy on read

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread robert engels
Actually, scratch that request. As long as they are package level, I can put the class in the same package. Problem was that in the past some important states fields have been private. On Feb 22, 2007, at 4:04 PM, robert engels wrote: I think the getters need to be public, as it makes many o

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475178 ] Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-811: - I think making some methods public is fine, so long as the class is kept

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-811) Public API inconsistency

2007-02-22 Thread Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-811?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475193 ] Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-811: -- I'm fine with making these classes package-private - Luke alread

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-804) build.xml: result of "dist-src" should support "build-contrib"

2007-02-22 Thread Doron Cohen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doron Cohen resolved LUCENE-804. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.2 Commited this. Fixing of contrib/db/* to have downloada

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-794) Beginnings of a span based highlighter

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-794: --- Attachment: spanhighlighter.patch Forget all the .java files...just get spanhighlighter.patch and app

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-813) leading wildcard's don't work with trailing wildcard

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
leading wildcard's don't work with trailing wildcard Key: LUCENE-813 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-813 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Hoss

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-813) leading wildcard's don't work with trailing wildcard

2007-02-22 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man updated LUCENE-813: Attachment: qp-leading-wildcard.patch patch demonstrating problem in testcase > leading wildcard's don't w