I wonder why this commit is needed. It only affects the core classes, not th
tests. To compile correct backwards tests it should not be important if the
methods exist or not.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original M
Yes that's indeed the case, see LUCENE-1529.
Michael
On 10/13/09 12:25 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
It was weird - I ran all the tests before I did the previous commit
and it worked fine. Then after committing I wanted to doublecheck by
running 'ant test-tag' and got the compile errors.
I think
It was weird - I ran all the tests before I did the previous commit and
it worked fine. Then after committing I wanted to doublecheck by running
'ant test-tag' and got the compile errors.
I think something is wrong with my eclipse and/or svn. But I also
switched from tortoise to command-line r
Hi Michael,
I fixed it here, should I commit?
You problem was maybe that you thought, the backwards test code must compile
against trunk. But it's vice versa. I reverted everything and only removed
the getTerms() checks in the backwards branch. Now it works and the
backwards testing is correct.
Yes, thats why we do the tests. By this it is possible to test compiled Java
1.4 code against new Java 1.5 lucene core with generics and test, that no
upper generics boundaries (e.g. by things like ) are
violated.
But if you rewrite the tests to only use the API of lucene 3.0 and no
deprecated met
I found the reason why it broke:
You changed in the backwards branch main code in your first commit the
following:
+Set terms = new HashSet();
+qr.extractTerms(terms);
+assertEquals(1, terms.size());
And the backwards branch core and test is compiled with Java 1.4 - bumm. So
general
You're right of course! I made the changes to both testcases in the
back-compat branch first, but I shouldn't have commit the changes to
JustCompileSearchSpans - that was my mistake. And then I forgot for a
minute about LUCENE-1529 (when I added the test-tag feature initially it
*compiled* the
Yeah please go ahead! Thanks for fixing.
I have it hear working too now - I just took the
lucene_2_9_back_compat_tests_20091011 tag and made only the fix to
TestFieldMaskingSpanQuery (without Java 1.5 code of course ;) ) and
*not* the changes to JustCompileSearchSpans and test-tag is passing n
isCurrent() and getVersion() on an NRT reader are broken
Key: LUCENE-1976
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1976
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Compon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1972:
--
Summary: Remove (deprecated) ExtendedFieldCache and Auto/Custom caches and
lot's of deprecated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1972:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1972-bw.patch
LUCENE-1972.patch
This patch removes Extended
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1972.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 824699
> Remove (deprecated) ExtendedFieldCache and A
OK I will cut a branch & commit Mark's last patch onto it, unless
anyone has objections soonish...
I'll also branch (twig?) the back compat branch so we can commit the
patch there as well.
Mike
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> SVN is about as good at merging branches as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1977:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1977.patch
Here the patch. This also fixes the highlighter problem with Num
Remove MultiTermQuery.getTerm()
---
Key: LUCENE-1977
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1977
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Search
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Remove HitCollector
---
Key: LUCENE-1978
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1978
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Remove the rest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1978:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1978-bw.patch
LUCENE-1978.patch
attached is the patch. Will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1977?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1977.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 824771
> Remove MultiTermQuery.getTerm()
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765082#action_12765082
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1929:
---
This is fixed also in trunk, but different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1929?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765082#action_12765082
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1929 at 10/13/09 7:11 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1978.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Committed revision: 824781
> Remove HitCollecto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1978:
--
Component/s: Search
> Remove HitCollector
> ---
>
> Key: LUCEN
I can trunk it once more if you'd like - its already pretty out of date :)
If you havn't started anyway ...
Michael McCandless wrote:
> OK I will cut a branch & commit Mark's last patch onto it, unless
> anyone has objections soonish...
>
> I'll also branch (twig?) the back compat branch so we c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1973:
---
There are still some of them:
- explain() i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1972:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1972-2.patch
Some small additional deprecated removals after finishing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765097#action_12765097
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1959:
---
Indeed, thanks for the fix - I'll c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765098#action_12765098
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1972:
---
Committed revision: 824792
> Remove (depre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 10/13/09 7:57 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765101#action_12765101
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1959:
---
Committed revision 824798.
> Index
Yes please!
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I can trunk it once more if you'd like - its already pretty out of date :)
>
> If you havn't started anyway ...
>
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>> OK I will cut a branch & commit Mark's last patch onto it, unless
>> anyone h
I think the big changes in the o.a.l.search package are over... :-) - Worked
the whole day on it.
Merging branches with TortoiseSVN works really good, you can even edit the
conflicts directly in the diff view. Used it when fixing the IR/IW hell
deprecations in the BW branch.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schind
Hmm ... doing some heavy merging so it might be me, but there also might
be a test failure with this now and some of the trunk changes ...
Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1959.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Andrzej!
> Index Splitter
> --
>
>
I think it was me - ran by itself with eclipse - must have been an
incremental compile issue or something.
Mark Miller wrote:
> Hmm ... doing some heavy merging so it might be me, but there also might
> be a test failure with this now and some of the trunk changes ...
>
> Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA) w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1458:
Attachment: LUCENE-1458.patch
Latest to trunk - still issues with GC and the reopen thread safety
On 10/13/09 7:28 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -115,7 +95,6 @@
*Applications should usually call {...@link Searcher#search(Query)} or
* {...@link Searcher#search(Query,Filter)} instead.
* @throws BooleanQuery.TooManyClauses
- * @deprecated use {...@link #search(Weight, Filt
Shall we first remove the remaining deprecations from the indexer
package? There are not many more left, shouldn't be much work.
Michael
On 10/13/09 5:47 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK I will cut a branch& commit Mark's last patch onto it, unless
anyone has objections soonish...
I'll also
I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement
method is the method itself.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tu
Remove remaining deprecations from indexer package
--
Key: LUCENE-1979
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: Index
Fix javadocs after deprecation removal
--
Key: LUCENE-1980
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1980
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Fi
Right. I was confused about that too.
Michael
On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
I think this was a mistake. Especially because the hint to the replacement
method is the method itself.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.
Allow access to entries in the field cache
--
Key: LUCENE-1981
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Search
Aff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765149#action_12765149
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
Whoops - double check the wrong index splitter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom Hill updated LUCENE-1981:
-
Attachment: lucene-1981.patch
Here's a sample implementation. There are a number of possible ways to do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-944:
-
Attachment: lucene-944-bw.patch
lucene-944.patch
Tiny change in QueryUtils#checkS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765157#action_12765157
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1981:
--
We shouldn't tie IndexReader/SegmentReader to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765149#action_12765149
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 10/13/09 10:45 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1606:
Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch
updated patch to trunk:
* add support for optional regex features
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765180#action_12765180
]
Amit Nithian commented on LUCENE-1342:
--
I just encountered this error in our own QA e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1342?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Nithian updated LUCENE-1342:
-
Attachment: hs_err_pid13693.log
> 64bit JVM crashes on Linux
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-944.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 824870.
> Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1756:
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Assignee: Rober
Hi all,
I wrote a draft for a mail I'd like to send to java-user to get some
feedback about the proposed changes to our backwards-compatibility
policy we discussed here and on LUCENE-1698.
Let me know what you think please!
Michael
Hello Lucene users:
In the past we have discussed our bac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765204#action_12765204
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
Looks pretty simple - the field is not getting
Looks good!
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wrote a draft for a mail I'd like to send to java-user to get some
> feedback about the proposed changes to our backwards-compatibility policy we
> discussed here and on LUCENE-1698.
> Let me know what you thi
I think it should be more clear that the devs have not come to an
agreement on this change yet, irregardless of the communities input.
Michael McCandless wrote:
> Looks good!
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I wrote a draft for a mail I'd li
For the record - I still don't see what we gain but confusion.
The major numbers don't have any significant meaning in terms of
features or advancements.
If we want to remove deprecations faster after deprecating in 4.1, we
should just not release 4.2,4.3,4.4,4.5, and then 4.9.
We should go from
I think I'm against sending such a request for feedback - and I think
we already know what the results will be.
The email reads like "we want to do this, OK?" - and the beneficiaries
of what is a volunteer effort are likely to respond overwhelmingly
"OK!". One could take the reverse position and p
On 10/13/09 1:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
I think it should be more clear that the devs have not come to an
agreement on this change yet, irregardless of the communities input.
OK I made a few changes near the end to make that clearer. How's it now?
Draft:
Hello Lucene users:
In the past
On 10/13/09 1:18 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I think I'm against sending such a request for feedback - and I think
we already know what the results will be.
I've mentioned it several times on java-dev and LUCENE-1698 that I'd
like to ask the user
community and nobody objected.
The email rea
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Mark Miller wrote:
For the record - I still don't see what we gain but confusion.
The major numbers don't have any significant meaning in terms of
features or advancements.
That's a perception we don't have control over.
A release incrementing the major release number i
On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
Shall we first remove the remaining deprecations from the indexer
package? There are not many more left, shouldn't be much work.
I wasn't quick enough for you :) Working on LUCENE-1979 now - that will
be the first test on how good svn merge is!
Mi
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> I've mentioned it several times on java-dev and LUCENE-1698 that I'd like to
> ask the user
> community and nobody objected.
It's the old polling problem - how you ask influences the outcome (as
I said below), and you didn't say exactly how
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765234#action_12765234
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
OK I think I've committed Mark's
Woops sorry I missed that!
Yes this'll be our first test :)
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
>>
>> Shall we first remove the remaining deprecations from the indexer package?
>> There are not many more left, shouldn't be much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765237#action_12765237
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
By the way, a lot of these PriorityQueues c
No problem! I'm excited about the new branch!
Have to try to write some codecs now...
Michael
On 10/13/09 2:09 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Woops sorry I missed that!
Yes this'll be our first test :)
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
On 10/13/09 9:43 AM, Mic
I've added missing enums classes, but everything else is looking good so
far.
Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765234#action_12765234
> ]
>
> Mich
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765246#action_12765246
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1969:
Patch looks good!
How do I run t
Excellent, thanks!
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I've added missing enums classes, but everything else is looking good so
> far.
>
> Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-1981.
--
Resolution: Invalid
> Allow access to entries in the field cache
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani reassigned LUCENE-1937:
Assignee: (was: Adriano Crestani)
> Add more methods to manipulate QueryNodePr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1937:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1937_10_13_2009.patch
New patch, now QueryNodeProcessorPipeline imple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani reassigned LUCENE-1938:
Assignee: (was: Adriano Crestani)
> Precedence query parser using the contrib/
OK, I made the draft a bit "more neutral" by pointing out the downsides
clearer. However, I think we have to explain reasons for and against the
change, otherwise people who didn't follow these discussions on java-dev
will have no idea why we actually want to make a change at all. I added
your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1974:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1974.test.patch
this is the same as the previously attached test but i've simplified
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1974:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1974.test.patch
tweaked test so that it can be applied to 2.4.1 (by removing readOnly
Can someone smarter then me review the patch in LUCENE-1974...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
...on the surface this seems to suggest a pretty serious error somewhere
in the low level scoring code when a BooleanQuery is involved.
(If this really is a bug, and not just me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1974:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> BooleanQuery can not find all matches in specia
I'm looking at it...
Mike
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> Can someone smarter then me review the patch in LUCENE-1974...
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
>
> ...on the surface this seems to suggest a pretty serious error somewhere in
> the low lev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765299#action_12765299
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
Hmm... seems to be a bug in Boole
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765303#action_12765303
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1974:
-
Hoss man, i played with this a little, maybe th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765306#action_12765306
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-1969:
---
My bad! The build.xml is not updated with the packa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John Wang updated LUCENE-1969:
--
Attachment: build.xml
updated build.xml with package name changes.
> adding kamikaze to lucene contri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979:
--
Attachment: lucene-1979.patch
Removes almost all deprecations from the indexer package. The on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765310#action_12765310
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
Ugh, this is the bug:
{code}
Ind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765315#action_12765315
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1974:
---
It's also concerning that no unit test catc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765316#action_12765316
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1979:
bq. IndexReader#getFieldCacheKey(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765318#action_12765318
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1969:
Excellent, I can now run ant test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765319#action_12765319
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1969:
Also, John, have you started the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1969:
---
Attachment: kamikaze.test.out
Output when I ran "ant test".
> adding kamikaze to lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765320#action_12765320
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
OK, will do!
> Remove remaining deprecatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1969:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> adding kamikaze to lucene contrib
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979:
--
Attachment: lucene-1979-bw.patch
Patch for the back-compat trunk.
Hmm, everything passes, exc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765324#action_12765324
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1969:
--
As a package name, perhaps something like "do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765327#action_12765327
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
bq. It's also concerning that no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1974.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
2.9.1
Thanks tangfu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979:
--
Attachment: lucene-1979.patch
Same patch as before, but with IndexReader#getFieldCacheKey() un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765332#action_12765332
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1974:
--
bq. It's also concerning that no unit test ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765336#action_12765336
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1979:
bq. Is it correct that we keep In
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
