I already wrote an comment in the flex issue about that. Its not really
good. Maybe we should change the FilteredTermsEnum also to require calling
next() first, which makes it more useable like an iterator. I was always not
so happy with the fact, that you need to have the strange do...while loop.
I forgot: As we already have a new API, we can change this behaviour for
TermsEnums easily and it seems for the SegmentTermsEnums its already done. A
lot of people on java-user always had the same problem, that you need to use
a do-while-loop which is not intuitive.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I already wrote an comment in the flex issue about that. Its not really
> good. Maybe we should change the FilteredTermsEnum also to require calling
> next() first, which makes it more useable like an iterator.
+1
> I was always not
> so hap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yuval Feinstein updated LUCENE-2091:
Attachment: LUCENE-2091.patch
I have attached a patch for this case. This is Joaquin's BM2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785250#action_12785250
]
Yuval Feinstein commented on LUCENE-2091:
-
So what is the next step? Robert, do yo
Hi Mike,
> Let's remove the .empty(), and let's switch to this "normal iterator"
> semantics -- I think I had originally added that back when TermsEnum
> didn't have a .term() method, ie, you had to keep the result returned
> from calling .next() or .seek(). But that proved too much of hassle
> (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785253#action_12785253
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2102:
-
I plan to commit the latest patch until
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer closed LUCENE-2094.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Since nobody commented on the proposal to close this issue I will close it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785264#action_12785264
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2091:
-
Hi Yuval, I see your patch, I can help with som
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785264#action_12785264
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-2091 at 12/3/09 10:56 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785271#action_12785271
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2091:
---
I was wondering about the separate BooleanQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785271#action_12785271
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2091 at 12/3/09 11:04 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785272#action_12785272
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2091:
-
Uwe, yes I agree it would be nicer to do a tigh
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> Actually TermEnum (the current API) already behaves like a normal
>> iterator, right? It's only FilteredTermEnum (and, FilteredTermsEnum)
>> that pre-next's itself on construction. So we should fix
>> FilteredTermsEnum to not pre-next, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785284#action_12785284
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2091:
-
Hi Yuval, I think we should also consider BM25F
Lucene does not support Unicode Normalization Forms
---
Key: LUCENE-2105
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2105
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Anal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785288#action_12785288
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
bq. originally borrowed to sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785291#action_12785291
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. we should declare that it's for internal u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785299#action_12785299
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. Interesting ... after many, m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785301#action_12785301
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
Cool - was actually thinking about looking if y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785302#action_12785302
]
DM Smith commented on LUCENE-2105:
--
Is this a duplicate or solved by LUCENE-1488? It prov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785303#action_12785303
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
One thing I came along long time ago, but n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785301#action_12785301
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 12/3/09 1:20 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785305#action_12785305
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. Cool - was actually thinking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785303#action_12785303
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 12/3/09 1:24 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785308#action_12785308
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. DocsEnum should extend DocIdS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785310#action_12785310
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. getAttributes() returning it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785312#action_12785312
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 12/3/09 1:29 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785312#action_12785312
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
RE: the terms cache
Should and still try and d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785314#action_12785314
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
bq. It'd be great if we could find a way to
Anyone else seeing this?
Now when I try and run the micro-benchmark on trunk or flex branch, a
few seconds in, I get :
[java] Running algorithm from:
/home/mark/workspace/lucene/contrib/benchmark/conf/micro-standard.alg
[java] > config properties:
[java] analyzer = org.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785314#action_12785314
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 12/3/09 1:34 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785314#action_12785314
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 12/3/09 1:36 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1458:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1458-DocIdSetIterator.patch
Here the patch with refactoring DocsEnum.
With
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785341#action_12785341
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2105:
-
right there is a Filter in LUCENE-1488 for effi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2105.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of LUCENE-1215 (JDK 6 Impl) and LUCENE-1488 (ICU Impl)
> Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1458:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1458-DocIdSetIterator.patch
Updated patch:
I did a search on "AttributeSo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785344#action_12785344
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2074:
-
bq. Will the old jflex fail on %unicode {x.y} s
Benchmark does not close its Reader when OpenReader/CloseReader are not used
Key: LUCENE-2106
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2106
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2106:
Attachment: LUCENE-2106.patch
> Benchmark does not close its Reader when OpenReader/CloseReader ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785348#action_12785348
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2074:
---
Thanks Steve.
Do you see a problem with ju
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785356#action_12785356
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. Should we still try and do th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785360#action_12785360
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
Patch looks good Uwe!
bq. Match
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785362#action_12785362
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. How about starting w/o reuse
Make that LUCENE-2106 :)
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Is this due to LUCENE-1206?
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Anyone else seeing this?
>>
>> Now when I try and run the micro-benchmark on trunk or flex branch, a
>> few s
Is this due to LUCENE-1206?
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Anyone else seeing this?
>
> Now when I try and run the micro-benchmark on trunk or flex branch, a
> few seconds in, I get :
>
> [java] Running algorithm from:
> /home/mark/workspace/lucene/contrib/benchmar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785365#action_12785365
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
bq. Sweet! Wait, using AllDocsEnum you mean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785365#action_12785365
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1458 at 12/3/09 3:53 PM:
Add contrib/fast-vector-highlighter to Maven central repo
-
Key: LUCENE-2107
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2107
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Com
Yup, that was the issue.
Michael McCandless wrote:
> Make that LUCENE-2106 :)
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>
>> Is this due to LUCENE-1206?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone else seeing this?
>>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785377#action_12785377
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. There is no method in IndexR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785379#action_12785379
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2102:
-
Hello Simon, if this issue is resolved (so we d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785404#action_12785404
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
OK I just removed SorterTemplate.
Hello,
I'm needing to depend on some recently committed bugfix from Lucene's
2.9 branch in other OSS projects, using Maven2 for dependency
management.
Are there snapshots uploaded somewhere regularly? Could Hudson do that?
Looking into Hudson it appears that it regularly builds trunk;
wouldn't it
I'll take it. The patch looks good, and tests pass. Thanks Erick,
and thanks for the reminder...
Mike
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Is anyone thinking about committing this patch? And/or what do I need to
> do/should have done to indicate it's ready for review?
> Poo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2037:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless (was: Erick Erickson)
> Allow Junit4 tests in ou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785408#action_12785408
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2037:
Anyone have any concerns upgradin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785414#action_12785414
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2074:
-
bq. Do you see a problem with just requiring Fl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785416#action_12785416
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2074:
---
bq. I'm actually surprised that the DFAs ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785448#action_12785448
]
Kay Kay commented on LUCENE-2037:
-
+1 w.r.t JUnit 4 .
Unrelated to this - but there is an
I was thinking we could create a new version in Jira for the flex branch
(that's what Hadoop HDFS is doing with their append branch). Then we can
open new Jira issues with fix version=flex branch. It's getting a bit
confusing to always use 1458 for all changes :)
Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785473#action_12785473
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-2091:
--
+1 for skipping BM25 and going straig
SpellChecker file descriptor leak - no way to close the IndexSearcher used by
SpellChecker internally
-
Key: LUCENE-2108
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eirik Bjorsnos updated LUCENE-2108:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2108-SpellChecker-close.patch
Patch that adds a close method to SpellChec
+1, good idea!
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
> I was thinking we could create a new version in Jira for the flex branch
> (that's what Hadoop HDFS is doing with their append branch). Then we can
> open new Jira issues with fix version=flex branch. It's getting a bit
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785479#action_12785479
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2037:
bq. but there is another patch -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785480#action_12785480
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2065:
Kay Kay, it looks like this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2065:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Java 5 port phase II
> -
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785484#action_12785484
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2108:
Shouldn't the new close() method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2108:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> SpellChecker file descriptor leak - no way to c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785492#action_12785492
]
Eirik Bjorsnos commented on LUCENE-2108:
Haha, this is why I said the patch should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785500#action_12785500
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2108:
Note that you said "private" agai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785504#action_12785504
]
Eirik Bjorsnos commented on LUCENE-2108:
Dude, you have be to a human to make mis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2108.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
3.0.1
Thanks Eirik!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785507#action_12785507
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2108:
bq. Dude, you have be to a human
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785524#action_12785524
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2074:
-
Thanks, Uwe, that makes sense. My bad, I only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785527#action_12785527
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2108:
-
Mike / Eirik,
If you set the searcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2108:
Attachment: LUCENE-2108.patch
Something like that would be more appropriate IMO
> SpellCh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785531#action_12785531
]
Eirik Bjorsnos commented on LUCENE-2108:
Simon,
Yes, that sound excactly like wha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-2108:
Reopening to get the AlreadyClosedException in there...
> SpellChecker file descripto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785538#action_12785538
]
Joaquin Perez-Iglesias commented on LUCENE-2091:
Hi everybody,
I'm going
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785541#action_12785541
]
Eirik Bjorsnos commented on LUCENE-2108:
Well not exactly. Simon's suggestion was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785563#action_12785563
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2108:
-
bq. I'd assume ensureOpen needs to be s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785567#action_12785567
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2108:
-
Just a reminder - we need to fix the CH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1458:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.9)
Flex Branch
Fix Version/s: Fle
OK, done!
I updated 1458 too. We can probably resolve that one now and open more
specific issues.
Michael
On 12/3/09 12:14 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
+1, good idea!
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
I was thinking we could create a new version in Jira for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785569#action_12785569
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2091:
---
Thanks for the explanation!
About the IDF:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785569#action_12785569
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2091 at 12/3/09 10:17 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-2107:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
> Add contrib/fast-vector-highlighter to Maven central rep
Thats good!
I will create a new issue out of my DocIdSetIterator and AttributeSource
patch and we could then close the 1458.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...
Make DocsEnum subclass of DocIdSetIterator
--
Key: LUCENE-2109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2109
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Affe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2109:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2109.patch
Here the patch.
> Make DocsEnum subclass of DocIdSetIterator
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785581#action_12785581
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2109:
---
The DocIdSetIterator approach can be easily
Change FilteredTermsEnum to work like Iterator, so it is not positioned and
next() must be always called first. Remove empty()
--
Key: LUCENE-2110
I generified the searches/function files in patch 2037. I don't really think
there's a conflict, just commit my patch and have at generifying the rest.
I know, I know. I did two things at once. So sue me. Honest, I'll try not to
do this very often ...
Mike:
You really want to to the generify the
Why would we close it though? Doesn't it make sense to wait until its
merged into trunk ...
Michael Busch wrote:
> OK, done!
>
> I updated 1458 too. We can probably resolve that one now and open more
> specific issues.
>
> Michael
>
> On 12/3/09 12:14 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> +1, good ide
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I generified the searches/function files in patch 2037. I don't really think
> there's a conflict, just commit my patch and have at generifying the rest.
OK so then we'll start with 2037, then take 2065's patch, hopefully
updated to current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12785603#action_12785603
]
Eirik Bjorsnos commented on LUCENE-2108:
Mike,
Please account for my demonstrated
Yeah I would say we leave it open.
There's also a good amount of fixing still (cleaning up the nocommits)
which likely should just go in under LUCENE-1458.
Mike
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Why would we close it though? Doesn't it make sense to wait until its
> merged in
You can also create a new issue "Merge flex branch into trunk" with fix
version 3.1 ;)
Michael
On 12/3/09 2:55 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Why would we close it though? Doesn't it make sense to wait until its
merged into trunk ...
Michael Busch wrote:
OK, done!
I updated 1458 too. We can pr
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
