[PATCH] ant-task "javadocs-all" fails with OutOfMemoryError
---
Key: LUCENE-2134
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2134
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2134:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2134.patch
Adds a "maxmemory" attribute to the javadoc ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2133:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 3.1)
2.9.1
3.0
Than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787378#action_12787378
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
Hi Uwe,
thanks for revie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787378#action_12787378
]
Christian Kohlschütter edited comment on LUCENE-2133 at 12/8/09 9:20 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787387#action_12787387
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2133:
---
bq. The change of setNextReader() to use on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787387#action_12787387
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2133 at 12/8/09 10:08 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2090?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787389#action_12787389
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2090:
bq. Mike, I converted this to cha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2134:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> [PATCH] ant-task "javadocs-all" fails with OutO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787391#action_12787391
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2134:
Patch looks reasonable. I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2134.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Thanks Christian!
> [PATCH] ant-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2110:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2110-nextSeekTermUpd.patch
Here a small update that changed nextSeekTerm to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787401#action_12787401
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2110 at 12/8/09 10:42 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787402#action_12787402
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2134:
Hi Michael,
yes, I forgo
IndexReader.close should forcefully evict entries from FieldCache
-
Key: LUCENE-2135
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bu
MultiReader should not use PQ for its Term/sEnum if it has only 1 reader
Key: LUCENE-2136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1606-flex.patch
I updated the patch because of my last commit.
Your's looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787406#action_12787406
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2135:
This is not unlike what we had to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2136:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2136-trunk.patch
Patch for trunk.
> MultiReader should not use P
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2136:
---
Fix Version/s: Flex Branch
> MultiReader should not use PQ for its Term/sEnum if it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787443#action_12787443
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2136:
---
+1
looks good and is really simple.
> Mult
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787447#action_12787447
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2136:
I have flex version coming shortl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2136:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2136-flex.patch
Flex version of patch. I only patched flex APIs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2136.
Resolution: Fixed
> MultiReader should not use PQ for its Term/sEnum if it has onl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1923?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787472#action_12787472
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1923:
---
i won't have the time till after the new year.
if
Mike,
the test for RegEx was correct, it uses getEnum() not getTermsEnum()! So the
first term returned must be null, because the enum must be positioned on the
first term (which was the case for old enums). If that is not the case such
a query would at least hit one term. So in trunk this test is
Mike I checked,
it seems that you simply copied the code from flex, where the test must be
removed.
In trunk, I'll revert, test passes correctly. I was a little bit confused,
why it should not pass.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@theta
Here the test is ok, because in flex the enum is unitialized before fisrt
next() call.
But even in flex the backwards API should be tested, so the getEnum() test
from trunk should be here, too.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
Sorry, right, test passed on trunk, but it's still not valid even on
trunk (I think?). Ie TermEnum.term() is undefined until you've called
next?
Mike
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Mike I checked,
>
> it seems that you simply copied the code from flex, where the test mu
It is defined to be null.
Because the enums in trunk are positioned on the first term (because
IR.terms(Term) positions the enum on the first term, if the term does not
exist, it must be null, else you cannot detect that the enum is empty).
Because of that you have the do-while loops in trunk!
In
Aaaahh, right. OK thanks for putting it back. And I'll add a test
over on flex to assert this.
Mike
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> It is defined to be null.
>
> Because the enums in trunk are positioned on the first term (because
> IR.terms(Term) positions the enum on
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> Sorry, right, test passed on trunk, but it's still not valid even on
> trunk (I think?). Ie TermEnum.term() is undefined until you've called
> next?
You're thinking TermDocs I think - TermEnum.term() is defined to be
positioned on or a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787502#action_12787502
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
Hi Uwe,
your arguments s
Yes, exactly.
The problem is that in flex we made it more intuitive and iterator-like, it
always works identical - call next() or seek() first, before that it is
undefined. So you always have to think about - is it flex or is it trunk.
We should get flex in as fast as possible :-) but we still ha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2133:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2133.patch
Improved patch (src/java only), now without mo
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Yonik Seeley
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Michael McCandless
> wrote:
>> Sorry, right, test passed on trunk, but it's still not valid even on
>> trunk (I think?). Ie TermEnum.term() is undefined until you've called
>> next?
>
> You're thinking TermDo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2133:
---
Attachment: (was: test.patch)
> [PATCH] IndexCache: Refactoring of Field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2133:
---
Attachment: (was: demo.patch)
> [PATCH] IndexCache: Refactoring of Field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2133:
---
Attachment: (was: contrib.patch)
> [PATCH] IndexCache: Refactoring of Fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2133:
---
Attachment: (was: java.patch)
> [PATCH] IndexCache: Refactoring of Field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787505#action_12787505
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2135:
-
A better approach is to don IR-keyed we
LUCENE-831...
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Earwin Burrfoot (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:40 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [jira]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787509#action_12787509
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2135:
---
LUCENE-831...
> IndexReader.close should f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787514#action_12787514
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2135:
--
bq. A better approach is to don IR-keyed weak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787552#action_12787552
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2135:
-
bq. I'd love to see a Map IndexReader.g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787555#action_12787555
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2135:
---
bq. I'm currently using - T IndexReader.co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Kohlschütter updated LUCENE-2133:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2133.patch
Added code to automatically evict entries from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787561#action_12787561
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2135:
Please see LUCENE-2133 fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787575#action_12787575
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1377:
---
+1, I'll help. And I would also help to con
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787573#action_12787573
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
hello, I would like to raise attention to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787585#action_12787585
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2135:
-
bq. Please see LUCENE-2133 for a refact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787586#action_12787586
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
There are some downsides for Solr: if these a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787589#action_12787589
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
Hehehe. There is an upside for Lucene:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787591#action_12787591
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
Yonik, I suppose what I am suggesting is a way
Hi,
What to do now, any votes on adding the missing maven artifacts for
fast-vector-highlighter to 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 on the apache maven reposititory?
> I rebuilt the maven-dir for 2.9.1 and 3.0.0, merged them (3.0.0 is top-
> level
> version) and extracted only fast-vector-highlighter:
>
> http:/
: What to do now, any votes on adding the missing maven artifacts for
: fast-vector-highlighter to 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 on the apache maven reposititory?
It's not even clear to me that anything special needs to be done before
publishing those jars to maven. 2.9.1 and 3.0.0 were already voted on and
Sorry didn't realize we were voting here -- next time put VOTE in there ;)
+1
I spot checked a couple of the sigs.
Mike
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What to do now, any votes on adding the missing maven artifacts for
> fast-vector-highlighter to 2.9.1 and 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787595#action_12787595
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. There are some downsides for Solr: if these
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787599#action_12787599
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2135:
I haven't followed the af
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787600#action_12787600
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. Who is this "we" of which you speak?
I d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787601#action_12787601
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. maybe this just gives another reason for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787602#action_12787602
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
So what do you guys think? I am pretty satisfie
Sorry,
I initially didn't want to start a vote, as Grant only proposed to "maybe
start one". But nobody responded (esp. to the questions in this mail) I ask
again, an I will start the vote for now.
Please vote, that the
+1
Mike
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> I initially didn't want to start a vote, as Grant only proposed to "maybe
> start one". But nobody responded (esp. to the questions in this mail) I ask
> again, an I will start the vote for now.
>
> ===
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2135:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2135.patch
I would love to see a bigger solution here, but in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787606#action_12787606
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1377:
Yonik, could Solr pull only Lucen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787605#action_12787605
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. But we've been unable to make that happen i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787612#action_12787612
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. Would it help if we also consolidated all o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787609#action_12787609
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
Hi, maybe we could simplify some things here if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787610#action_12787610
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2135:
---
In 2.9. we wrote in the BW section, that Fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787613#action_12787613
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2135:
---
In my opinion, all IndexReaders should call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787624#action_12787624
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2135:
bq. all IndexReaders should call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2128:
Attachment: LUCENE-2128.patch
updated patch - createDocFrequencyMap change from protected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787626#action_12787626
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2135:
--
bq. Hmm... this actually gets tricky to get r
+1 form none PMC
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1
>
> Mike
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>> Sorry,
>>
>> I initially didn't want to start a vote, as Grant only proposed to "maybe
>> start one". But nobody responded (esp. to the questions i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787631#action_12787631
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2124:
-
just a reminder, tomorrow i would like to commi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2135:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2135.patch
New patch, also evicts the other subclasses of IR from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787636#action_12787636
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2100:
-
will commit this tomorrow if nobody obj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787637#action_12787637
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. Anything which isn't Solr-specific should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787644#action_12787644
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2135:
---
+1
I just noticed, it is even possible to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787650#action_12787650
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2135:
bq. it is even possible to retrie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787647#action_12787647
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1377:
-
bq. A solr developer adds something to solr w/o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787648#action_12787648
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2100:
-
+1
(just my nitpick of s/TokenStreamsm/TokenS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787652#action_12787652
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2135:
---
+1 Good idea, just add a note to the method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787653#action_12787653
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1606:
bq. I think it would be nice to s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787654#action_12787654
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2124:
-
bq. this will move the contrib/collation JDK-ba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787658#action_12787658
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2018:
-
I still think this should be removed - or moved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787659#action_12787659
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2135:
Honestly, please have a l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787661#action_12787661
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2133:
Christian, could you roll up all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787662#action_12787662
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2124:
-
bq. The alternatives don't scale well, true, bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787667#action_12787667
]
Christian Kohlschütter commented on LUCENE-2133:
Michael, LUCENE-2133.patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787669#action_12787669
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. solr users benefit on the next release cy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787670#action_12787670
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2018:
bq. I still think this should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787674#action_12787674
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2018:
---
+1.
And Fuzzy Query's PQ then would use th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787675#action_12787675
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2100:
-
Simon, if you want I will take care of contrib/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787685#action_12787685
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
Ok, if no one objects I will (heavy) commit thi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787689#action_12787689
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2135:
I definitely plan to have a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2135:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2135.patch
New patch, adds override to FIR.getFieldCacheKey
> In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787696#action_12787696
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2135:
-
bq. To provide arbitrary cacheable obje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787699#action_12787699
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2133:
bq. I have removed the test, cont
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
