numerical problem associated with CustomScoreQuery, ValueSourceQuery
Key: LUCENE-1649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1649
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12711850#action_12711850
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-1646:
-
Our improvements are (so far) specific to our subc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715849#action_12715849
]
viobade commented on LUCENE-1491:
-
I think is better to keep the main goal of n
RegexQuery matches terms the input regex doesn't actually match
---
Key: LUCENE-1683
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1683
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718270#action_12718270
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-1683:
-
I screwed up the formatting. Fixed version:
{
when i search with "a" or "this is" or "that at" it is giving the parseException
Key: LUCENE-1751
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-175
incorrect doc description of fielded query syntax
-
Key: LUCENE-1765
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1765
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Other
ShingleFilter creates shingles across two consecutives documents : bug or
normal behaviour ?
Key: LUCENE-1958
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12763638#action_12763638
]
MRIT64 commented on LUCENE-1958:
It doesnt happen with Lucene 2.9 (just downlo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764134#action_12764134
]
MRIT64 commented on LUCENE-1958:
- Yes, I use a custom analyser which uses reusableT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764333#action_12764333
]
MRIT64 commented on LUCENE-1958:
Yes, Ok to mark this issue as resolved
> Shingl
BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condition
--
Key: LUCENE-1974
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
tangfulin updated LUCENE-1974:
--
Attachment: BooleanQueryTest.java
> BooleanQuery can not find all matches in special condit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765354#action_12765354
]
tangfulin commented on LUCENE-1974:
---
Good job, Thanks you all for this!
Though we
OOM exception while sorting on more than 1 field
Key: LUCENE-1193
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1193
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12572768#action_12572768
]
Eric commented on LUCENE-1195:
--
When faceting(iterating all terms), will each term be lo
Ability to store Reader / InputStream fields
Key: LUCENE-1206
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1206
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1213:
Component/s: QueryParser
> MultiFieldQueryParser ignores slop parame
MultiFieldQueryParser ignores slop parameter
Key: LUCENE-1213
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1213
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Trejkaz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1213:
Attachment: multifield-fix.patch
Attaching one possible fix. It's more verbose than I wish it cou
TermsFilter: reuse TermDocs
---
Key: LUCENE-1240
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1240
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Affects Versions: 2.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1240:
Attachment: terms-filter.patch
Attaching my attempt at improving this.
The original code didn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1240:
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
> TermsFilter: reuse TermD
MultiFieldQueryParser is not friendly for overriding
Key: LUCENE-1245
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1245:
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Summary: MultiFieldQueryParser is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1245:
Attachment: multifield.patch
Fix makes getFieldQuery(String,String) and getFieldQuery(String,String,int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12582490#action_12582490
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-1245:
-
Here's an example illustrating the way we w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12582490#action_12582490
]
trejkaz edited comment on LUCENE-1245 at 3/26/08 5:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12582490#action_12582490
]
trejkaz edited comment on LUCENE-1245 at 3/26/08 5:3
NullPointerException from FieldsReader after problem reading the index
--
Key: LUCENE-1262
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.3.1)
2.2
Whoops. I don't think it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.2)
2.1
Okay I'll eat my words now, it is indee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.1)
2.3.1
Summary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Trejkaz updated LUCENE-1262:
Attachment: Test.java
Attaching a test program to reproduce the problem under 2.3.1.
It occurs
based on hasmap value the selected items has to come
-
Key: LUCENE-1273
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1273
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12592996#action_12592996
]
Aviran commented on LUCENE-25:
--
This issue also affects version 2.2.0
> QueryParser p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gavin updated LUCENE-1264:
--
Reporter: Benson Margulies (was: Benson Margulies)
> Use of IOException in analysis component met
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593030#action_12593030
]
Maurizio commented on LUCENE-794:
-
Hi,
probably I'm missing something, I'm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593030#action_12593030
]
maurizio316 edited comment on LUCENE-794 at 4/29/08 7:43 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593068#action_12593068
]
Maurizio commented on LUCENE-794:
-
@Steven
thanks a lot, now it's working
@Bria
Open Office Created PDF content could not be searched
---
Key: LUCENE-1281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1281
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12604701#action_12604701
]
Trejkaz commented on LUCENE-1290:
-
To answer Doug's initial question, yes, we
QueryParser should have a setDateFormat(DateFormat) method
--
Key: LUCENE-1361
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1361
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Improvement reopen performance when index data is huge
--
Key: LUCENE-1362
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1362
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Wish
各分店
---
Key: LUCENE-1364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1364
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
Reporter: F.Y.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to
sub task of reopen performance
--
Key: LUCENE-1363
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1363
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Sub-task
Environment: win
Reporter: F.Y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
F.Y. closed LUCENE-1363.
Resolution: Fixed
> sub task of reopen performance
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
F.Y. closed LUCENE-1364.
Resolution: Fixed
> 各分店
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-1364
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
F.Y. updated LUCENE-1364:
-
Summary: sub task of reopen performance on linux (was: 各分店)
> sub task of reopen performance on li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
F.Y. updated LUCENE-1363:
-
Remaining Estimate: 48h
Original Estimate: 48h
> sub task of reopen performa
nation.
Maybe the option should be called "commonSynonyms" or the like...
> Patch for ShingleFilter.enablePositions
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-1380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-138
Creating PlainTextDictionary with UTF8 files
Key: LUCENE-1413
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1413
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: contrib
Inconsistent API
-
Key: LUCENE-1439
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1439
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0
Environment: any
Reporter: Ivan.S
The API of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12645826#action_12645826
]
Ivan.S commented on LUCENE-1439:
I was thinking about this issue as a "request&q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647548#action_12647548
]
Ivan.S commented on LUCENE-1439:
Can anyone open an umbrella bug for this?
I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647548#action_12647548
]
ivan.s edited comment on LUCENE-1439 at 11/14/08 1:09 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12648008#action_12648008
]
Ivan.S commented on LUCENE-1439:
I created a Wiki page for this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan.S reopened LUCENE-1439:
No one seems to care about this issue since it is closed, so I dare to reopen
it (after I created a Wiki
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12784373#action_12784373
]
Digy commented on LUCENE-1581:
--
What about adding a new option to ASCIIFoldingFilter jus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12784405#action_12784405
]
Digy commented on LUCENE-1581:
--
OK. thanks.
DIGY
> LowerCaseFilter should be abl
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2131
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
Affects Versions: 2.4
Reporter: wang
Priority: Minor
if (this.fieldName != other.fieldName // interned comparison
DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementation
Key: LUCENE-2146
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2146.patch
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Description:
The DisjunctionMaxQuery class hashCode() implementation is non-deterministic.
It uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2146.patch
this patch can fix this bug.
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2146.patch)
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
wang updated LUCENE-2146:
-
Attachment: DisjunctionMaxQueryTest.java
> DisjunctionMaxQuery has incorrect hashCode() implementat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2146?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12790107#action_12790107
]
wang commented on LUCENE-2146:
--
Thanks Michael and Uwe.
i understand it is not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802015#action_12802015
]
Deepak commented on LUCENE-2205:
Hi Aaron
I would like to test this patch on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802535#action_12802535
]
Deepak commented on LUCENE-2205:
Hi Aaron
I hope you will be able to post the f
spellchecker: make hard-coded values configurable
-
Key: LUCENE-852
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-852
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
karin updated LUCENE-852:
-
Description:
the class org.apache.lucene.search.spell.SpellChecker uses the following
hard-coded values in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524694
]
Nat commented on LUCENE-743:
Please also consider making an option where the reopen can be automated (i.e.
when the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12536510
]
Digy commented on LUCENE-1029:
--
I think , the phrase
+ * Please note that the replacements performed by this filter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558425#action_12558425
]
Nat commented on LUCENE-753:
I think bufsize has way much bigger impact than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivek commented on LUCENE-390:
--
Is there any plan to incorporate this IndexAccessor pac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivek commented on LUCENE-390:
--
Is there any plan to incorporate this IndexAccessor pac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivash edited comment on LUCENE-390 at 1/16/08 2:33 PM:
---
Is t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivash edited comment on LUCENE-390 at 1/16/08 2:33 PM:
---
Is t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12560912#action_12560912
]
vivek commented on LUCENE-855:
--
Any plans to have this part of Lucene
Token reuse is not ideal for avoiding array copies
--
Key: LUCENE-1181
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1181
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802903#action_12802903
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1990:
--
Paul: In the aligned case, and with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay Mundrawala updated LUCENE-2228:
---
Attachment: lucene-encryption.tar.gz
> AES Encrypted Direct
AES Encrypted Directory
---
Key: LUCENE-2228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Store
Affects Versions: 3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802915#action_12802915
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2228:
This looks cool!
Can you ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802927#action_12802927
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2221:
-
Results from Intel I7 -- an improvemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay Mundrawala updated LUCENE-2228:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2228.patch
> AES Encrypted Direct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jay Mundrawala updated LUCENE-2228:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
> AES Encrypted Direct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802972#action_12802972
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221:
--
bq. Results from Intel I7 - an improve
SimpleSpanFragmenter fails to start a new fragment
--
Key: LUCENE-2229
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2229
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803058#action_12803058
]
Vilaythong Southavilay commented on LUCENE-1488:
I tested Lao numbers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803061#action_12803061
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
Hi Vilay, this is not intentional to s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803061#action_12803061
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1488 at 1/20/10 11:4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2226.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 901505.
> move contrib/snowball to contrib/analyz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2226:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2226-javadocs.patch
Here the fix for the javadocs-all target after hudson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12803236#action_12803236
]
Cristian Vat commented on LUCENE-2221:
--
Ran the benchmark.jar also on my mac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221:
Attachment: (was: benchmark.jar)
> Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUtils) operati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221:
Attachment: benchmark.jar
An updated set of benchmarks (simple loops and JRE ntz/pop).
> Mi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221:
Attachment: (was: lucene-bitset-benchmarks.zip)
> Micro-benchmarks for ntz and pop (BitUt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-2221:
Attachment: lucene-bitset-benchmarks.zip
Updated source code for the benchmarks.
> Mi
401 - 500 of 24753 matches
Mail list logo
