RE: Retrieving a fully qualified hostname under NT

1998-11-12 Thread Rudhuwan Abu Bakar
hello sorry for this. Where can I get a type 4(?) JDBC driver? I am testing an Oracle server and want to use a Java-based client. Thank you for your time. regards duan

RE: Retrieving a fully qualified hostname under NT

1998-11-12 Thread Jason Dillon
Under Linux I don't get the FQDN for my machine. Primarily because when I set the machine up i did not specify it's hostname as its FQDN (which I don't think it should be). Java should have better access to the local machine's various names, but then again Java should have lots of better things.

Re: classes.zip

1998-11-12 Thread Michael Sinz
On Thu, 12 Nov 1998 14:33:50 PST, alex andrejin wrote: >hi! could somebody tell me where i can get the classes.zip for linux? >they are not included in the linux jdk nor jre. > >i realize it is a very basic question but i have found no docs to help >me. & i apologize in advance for cluttering t

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Mark Hofmann
Hi .. olivier Dulac wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions > about the list itself, and people using it... > > 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list > >*please* put a header in front of every email for t

classes.zip

1998-11-12 Thread alex andrejin
hi! could somebody tell me where i can get the classes.zip for linux? they are not included in the linux jdk nor jre. i realize it is a very basic question but i have found no docs to help me. & i apologize in advance for cluttering the list w/ goofy questions. thanks, alex a. __

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Thu, Nov 12, 1998 at 10:46:13PM +0100, olivier Dulac wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions > about the list itself, and people using it... > > 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list > >*please* put a

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Nelson Minar
> 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list No, please don't. There's no point. This list has been running just fine for two years without anyone doing this. All mail from this list already comes with this header: Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any decent mail sof

[Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread olivier Dulac
Hi, Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions about the list itself, and people using it... 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list *please* put a header in front of every email for the mailing list (exemple: "Subject: [Java-

Retrieving a fully qualified hostname under NT

1998-11-12 Thread Mark Hofmann
Hi all, I've posted that question a few days ago to java.lang.programmer but got no response :-( But, since this problem is really bugging me, and there might be some people in this list that run there progs under NT and Linux, just as me, I hope to find a solution here. Anyway, here is the probl

Re: which is the best CORBA/Java implementation?

1998-11-12 Thread Douglas A. Seifert
>I did exactly the same and worked perfectly for me as well, but I >didn't try it with JIT compilation switched on. >Please note that you won't have an IDL compiler under Linux, because >that part of JDK1.2 isn't written in Java :-( Yes, no help for this. We have had to run idltojava on a Solar

Re: which is the best CORBA/Java implementation?

1998-11-12 Thread A . KLOS
-- | From: seifertd / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: which is the best CORBA/Java implementation? | Date: Thursday, November 12, 1998 4:12PM | | | > Any chance to find something like this? BTW is anyone here using CORBA i

Re: Basics of using JNI under Linux

1998-11-12 Thread C.SARAVANAN
On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, peter johnson wrote: > > > Nicholas Matsakis wrote: > > > Briefly, I am trying to call a native method under Linux. I have a > > decent understanding of the JNI, and have gotten my code to load under > > windows, but am unable to load the shared library under Linux. Othe

Re: shuJIT: another Java/Linux JIT

1998-11-12 Thread Nelson Minar
Thank you for telling us more about shuJIT. It's wonderful to have several options for JITs for Java/Linux! >If we pursuit real good performance, I think that we should deploy >the intermediate representation such as GCC's RTL and perform more >optimizations like C compiler and register allocatio

Re: shuJIT: another Java/Linux JIT

1998-11-12 Thread SHUDOH Kazuyuki
[EMAIL PROTECTED](Nelson Minar) said: > I found a link to another JIT for Linux, shuJIT, at > http://www.shudo.net/jit/ Thanks. I'm the author of the JIT. I've forgotten to announce releace of my JIT compiler. > Executive summary: also works with FreeBSD, The JIT is being developing on Linux

Re: which is the best CORBA/Java implementation?

1998-11-12 Thread Douglas A. Seifert
> Any chance to find something like this? BTW is anyone here using CORBA in > conjunction with java? Hello, We have been able to get the JDK1.2beta CORBA implementation to work on our Linux box. All we did was unjar the jdk1.2beta classes.zip and then jar up all the org/omg stuff i

Re: JDK for 21064?

1998-11-12 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
> Admittedly, Sun publishes the specs (for now and on most > components) but thats an odd concession when matching > their specs does not give you something you can call Java. Gimme a break. Mesa has lived and grown within similar constraints for years and is quite well - it can be called "an imp

java-linux

1998-11-12 Thread 1a8
On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, Bernd Kreimeier wrote: > > Admittedly, Sun publishes the specs (for now and on most > > components) but thats an odd concession when matching > > their specs does not give you something you can call Java. > > Gimme a break. Mesa has lived and grown within similar constrai

Re: Anyone tried JNI Interface via dlopen/dlsym methods?

1998-11-12 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
Juergen Kreileder writes: > The dlopen thing works on 1.2 without problems! Don't want to sound like a broken record, but... ETA? Gibt es da ein Beta zu testen? Confidential or otherwise. b.

Re: Anyone tried JNI Interface via dlopen/dlsym methods?

1998-11-12 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
Juergen Kreileder writes: > Bernd, a short note on DestroyJavaVM: 1.1 does not support unloading > the virtual machine (the JNI spec says it does not work in '1.1.2' > but it applies to all 1.1 JDKs, Sun only forgot to update the spec). > The 1.2 documentation for DestroyJavaVM is more precise

Fw: Security Advisory Bulletin No.276

1998-11-12 Thread Ahmad Muhajir
 CONFIDENTIAL Date : Thursday  -   November  12 , 1998 Time : 10:35 AM No. : 276 TL : M-H INFORMATION: As a result of the incidents at several places yesterday, and as measurements to prevent additional incidents, regulations are implemented by the authorities in Jakarta, including: 1. R