Re: which linux/chip?

1999-01-11 Thread David Grimes
Hello, if you are interested in doing awesome OpenGL in Java and don't wan't to wait for sun to get their ?$%# together and write Java 3d for anything except windows and sparc solaris I'd highly recommend you check out Magician. Magician is a very thin Java layer into native OpenGL, and i

Re: suggestion for list (was: Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2

1999-01-11 Thread Nagendra Mishr
Can I suggest using ENewsWorks.. a JAVA based list management system running on linux. It's got all the features of all the other MLM's and we've tested it with millions of users. A list this size should be well under 300,000 users? Nagendra [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ENewsWorks URL: www.email

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Robert McConnell
Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with it. Bob McConnell N2SPP At 07:06 PM 1/11/99 -0800, blaise toad wrote: >Like paul proposes,

Re: which linux/chip?

1999-01-11 Thread Kirk Hutchinson
I don't know if the version of Linux makes a difference, but there is DEFINITELY more time spent on the x86 version of Java than any other platform. Believe me, the reason Java runs the fastest on NT is NOT because of the OS... kirk David Thompson wrote: > > Hello, > > I am struggling with a

Re: JSDK

1999-01-11 Thread Greg
David Harvill wrote: > I'm running RH5.2 on an x86 architecture. Anyone know if the Solaris/UNIX > version of SUN's Java Servlet Development Kit will work in this setup? > > -dave Yes, I've been using it just tonight! :) Greg

setting up swing

1999-01-11 Thread Brett Jones
Could someone point me to some docs on setting up swing. Thanks. -- Brett Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread blaise toad
Like paul proposes, I honestly believe web based threaded discussion are the best (a la slashdot). Newsgroup has ... nahh!! yeah I guess that would be cool. blaise (BTW thanks for many years of support to the bd folks) _ DO YOU YAHOO!

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread chang hun Park
$)C REMOVE Carlo E. Prelz @[<:GT: > Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes > Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 > > Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > > newsgroup proposed and po

JSDK

1999-01-11 Thread David Harvill
I'm running RH5.2 on an x86 architecture. Anyone know if the Solaris/UNIX version of SUN's Java Servlet Development Kit will work in this setup? -dave

Re: Is BlackDown JDK 1.1.7x Swing compatible?

1999-01-11 Thread chang hun Park
$)C REMOVE Kontorotsui @[<:GT: > On 11-Jan-99 Thomas Weholt wrote: > > Eh ... read the subject. Nothing else. Thanks for all your great work. > > Yes, it is, because Swing is certified 100% pure Java it will work on any 1.1.x > JKD ports. > --- > Andrea "Kontorotsui" Controzzi - MALE Stu

Re: native synchronized methods

1999-01-11 Thread chang hun Park
$)C REMOVE Juergen Kreileder @[<:GT: > > Jason Dillon writes: > > Jason> This is not really java-linux specific, but this is the > Jason> only java related group that I am subscribed to. I am > Jason> wondering if a native method is specified as synchronized > Jason> if t

Re: Is it 1.2 or 2.0?

1999-01-11 Thread chang hun Park
$)C REMOVE Anand Palaniswamy @[<:GT: > "JDK 1.2" and "Java 2" are synonyms. Notice the missing decimal point > in the latter (atleast for now). I believe the release is _not_ JDK 2 > or JDK 2.0 or Java 2.0. Please don't flame me about the confusion, me > just an engineer -- it was a market

Re: which linux/chip?

1999-01-11 Thread Patrick
I am a full time java developer. The firm I work for originally ran on NT/95 and we had serious crash problems. Plus the machine had to be reboot to allow servlets to work, etc. I took my AMDK6-2 233mhz and put redhat on it with the blackdown jdk, and it is absolutly awesome. I recommend to stick

RE: suggestion for list (was: Re: STOP asking about Java 1.2 / 2

1999-01-11 Thread Kontorotsui
On 10-Jan-99 Chris Abbey wrote: > I suggest that the current copy of the FAQ be included with the succesful > subscription message. I know this is possible with majordomo because other > lists do it. I believe this will reduce the volume of these questions because > it appears that most of the pe

RE: Is BlackDown JDK 1.1.7x Swing compatible?

1999-01-11 Thread Kontorotsui
On 11-Jan-99 Thomas Weholt wrote: > Eh ... read the subject. Nothing else. Thanks for all your great work. Yes, it is, because Swing is certified 100% pure Java it will work on any 1.1.x JKD ports. --- Andrea "Kontorotsui" Controzzi - MALE Student of Computer Science at University of Pisa - I

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Kontorotsui
On 10-Jan-99 Karl Asha wrote: > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > newsgroup proposed and possibly approved. Alternatively, I would really > appreciate a -stable- (and by stable I mean someplace that isn't going to > die within a week) to host the mailing li

Re: JDBC/servlet problem

1999-01-11 Thread Scott Fraser
>> Thanks, tried it but it didn't work. Any other ideas? << Well looking in some old code I noticed this was how I got the driver "registered": >> // Do it both ways for kicks: Class clsDriver = Class.forName( "package.SomeDriverName" ); DriverManager.regist

which linux/chip?

1999-01-11 Thread David Thompson
Hello, I am struggling with a decision that some have probably been through, or are currently experiencing: If one wishes to run Linux and write Java code (including, the potential of the java 3d api), should one get and x86 and run RedHatx (and or another x86 flavor), or should one go with a P

Re: Is it 1.2 or 2.0?

1999-01-11 Thread Anand Palaniswamy
"JDK 1.2" and "Java 2" are synonyms. Notice the missing decimal point in the latter (atleast for now). I believe the release is _not_ JDK 2 or JDK 2.0 or Java 2.0. Please don't flame me about the confusion, me just an engineer -- it was a marketing thang. -Anand.

Re: java strings and variables

1999-01-11 Thread Ivan Bilenkey
This question is off topic. Please use comp.lang.java.* for questions related to java programming. Thanx, Ivan Rick Bauman wrote: > > Hello everyone, I am using the following code in a program I am writing: > > BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader( new FileReader(inFile)); >

RE: perl2java

1999-01-11 Thread Jason Dillon
On 11-Jan-99 Rick Bauman wrote: > ...a perl2java converter.. that would be cool! --jason

perl2java

1999-01-11 Thread Rick Bauman
Does anyone know of a perl2java converter? I have a large collection of perl programs I have written over the years and this would rally help in converting to java. r -- Rick Bauman Lowcountry Linux http://www.lowcountry.net/

java strings and variables

1999-01-11 Thread Rick Bauman
Hello everyone, I am using the following code in a program I am writing: BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader( new FileReader(inFile)); while ( (line = br.readLine()) != null ) { StringTokenizer st = new StringTokenizer( line, ":" ); while(st.hasMoreTokens())

Is BlackDown JDK 1.1.7x Swing compatible?

1999-01-11 Thread Thomas Weholt
Eh ... read the subject. Nothing else. Thanks for all your great work. Thomas Weholt Reach me at : eMail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] HTTP ://bolinux1.hit.no/~u970130 ICQ : 7648088 Phone : +47 - 92 09 69 58

Re: Is it 1.2 or 2.0?

1999-01-11 Thread bryan vold
There is precedent, look at Solaris/SunOS versioning ... -bvold On Mon, Jan 11, 1999 at 08:29:40AM -0500, David Harvill wrote: > 1.2 and 2.0 both refer to the same version. It was originally > designated 1.2, but then SUN decided to rename it 2.0. I'm not clear on > the reasons. > > -dave >

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Cees de Groot
Option three would be to ask someone to explode the list for you. I'm running a setup at home with my ISP set as smarthost in my sendmail config, and that really cuts down on processing time, bandwidth, etcetera. Advantages: you get to keep the control over administration, and the one sponsoring

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread paul . wheaton
While I don't have mailing list facilities at this time, I do have web based threaded messaging. The software is supposed to include some mailing list facilities later this month. I would be happy to host this forum. Go to www.eporkchop.com, tell me what you want the forum to be named and I'

Re: Is it 1.2 or 2.0?

1999-01-11 Thread David Harvill
1.2 and 2.0 both refer to the same version. It was originally designated 1.2, but then SUN decided to rename it 2.0. I'm not clear on the reasons. -dave On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is the next, version that we are all waiting for 1.2 or 2.0? We should at > least klnow whi

Is it 1.2 or 2.0?

1999-01-11 Thread M . Patel
Is the next, version that we are all waiting for 1.2 or 2.0? We should at least klnow which version to wait around for while it is Beta tested

RE Sprites, Bitmaps Java classes

1999-01-11 Thread M . Patel
>>Just what does this have to do with Java on LINUX? Simple I want to write Java Games on Linux, surely this is not unheard of.

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:40:13 +0200 From: "Carlo E. Prelz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I guess vger is the right place to relocate the list. There seems to be an e-mail address to contact people there: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At least while the 2.2.0-pre* hoopla is going on I have to

Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-01-11 Thread Richard Jones
Mohammed Lokhandwala wrote: > > I am looking for a good JVM for Linux, > any help ? The Sun JVM, ported at http://www.blackdown.org is a good JVM, although not as fast as one might like. If you combine it with IBM's Jikes compiler, you'll get an excellent and robust Java development environment,

Java Plug-in

1999-01-11 Thread Rodrigo Rossi Fernandes Lima
Hi Java people, I4d like to know what are your plans for Java Plug-in ?!?! Will we have a Linux version of it ?!!? It4s the only thing I need to *never* use Windows anymore.. :) If you want any help, just call (write) me... (2 years working with Java, 5+ with C++, 2 years with Linux...) Thank

Unidentified subject!

1999-01-11 Thread Mohammed Lokhandwala
I am looking for a good JVM for Linux, any help ? Mohammed Lokhandwala

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Carlo E. Prelz
Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > newsgroup proposed and possibly approved. Alternatively, I would really > appre

Re: Java as CGI - problem

1999-01-11 Thread Yves De Muyter
Install JServ:http://java.apache.org -Yves On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Alexey Philimonov wrote: > Hi! > > I'm running website on RedHat Linux 5.1+Apache 1.3.3 and got a problem > trying to use Java program as CGI: > > - when I run java program from the shell as "java myclass" - output > is ok >

Re: Java as CGI - problem

1999-01-11 Thread Moses DeJong
You might need to set the CLASSPATH for you java program directly with the -classpath option from the CGI script. When the CGI is run it is forked() off from the server process so it will get the servers CLASSPATH not your shell CLASSPATH. This might be the reason your class works in the shell and

Java as CGI - problem

1999-01-11 Thread Alexey Philimonov
Hi! I'm running website on RedHat Linux 5.1+Apache 1.3.3 and got a problem trying to use Java program as CGI: - when I run java program from the shell as "java myclass" - output is ok - when I put the same command in shell script and run it - I perfectly get both script and Java output - when

Java && Linux

1999-01-11 Thread Ozer Irfan
Cheers all! -=Chris