Thread corrupt

1999-01-12 Thread Fan Howard-W12211
Hello all, I wrote an application running under RedHat 5.1 and JDK1.1.7a1. It randomly causes core dump and file corruption with following message: -- SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation stackbase=0x4137a000, stackpointer=0x41379cac F

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread SHUDO Kazuyuki
> > or move it to a place willing to host the java-linux and java-linux-digest > > lists. The world unfortunately isn't a place of free bandwidth forever > > and I have to make some decisions. > > java-linux is not a high-bandwidth mailing-list. > > I suggest looking at your configuration. I sugg

Re: JDK1.2

1999-01-12 Thread Patrick
DAMMIT!!! Why don't we just make a join message that says "The damn JDK1.2 (Java 2) isn't. Don't ask." - On Tue, 12 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > Just wondering about the status of JDK1.2 (a.k.a

JDK1.2

1999-01-12 Thread fcaesar
Hi guys, Just wondering about the status of JDK1.2 (a.k.a Java 2) for Linux. Can we expect a release by Feb. 1, 1999 ? - Farley Caesar P.S. Great work on the JDK1.1.x series for Linux by the way.

X86 GLIBC Port Question!

1999-01-12 Thread Sven Werner
Hi! I have a Linux libc 5.4.46 and glibc 2.0.7 System. Where the main library is the libc 5. The Distribution was SuSe's one (serveral time ago :-)). Now when I start the glibc port, I get the following message: ... > java hello.world /opt/Java/JDK/bin/checkVersions: /tmp/ldd.out.925: Permissio

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Robert McConnell
Alex, There are several, both commercial and open source. At least two of the newsgroups I follow are gatewayed from mailing lists. It shouldn't take too long at dejanews to find the software involved and possibly find a friendly gateway server. Bob McConnell N2SPP At 01:25 PM 1/12/99 -0500, Al

Re: which linux/chip?

1999-01-12 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, David Grimes wrote: > In response to the question about mesa and magician: > Yes, Magician comes with a precompiled Mesa library in both > static and dynamic forms. You can also use other versions > of Mesa such as the 3d-fx accelerated but I have not tried > and have n

Re: Unidentified subject!

1999-01-12 Thread Peter T Mount
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Richard Jones wrote: > Mohammed Lokhandwala wrote: > > > > I am looking for a good JVM for Linux, > > any help ? > > The Sun JVM, ported at http://www.blackdown.org > is a good JVM, although not as fast as one might > like. If you combine it with IBM's Jikes > compiler, you

Re: Plug In

1999-01-12 Thread Patrick
www.blackdown.org Follow the link to java/linux. Its somewhere on that page. - On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Matt Choate wrote: > > Do you know where I can download the port of the Java Plug-in for Linux? > > Thanks > Matt > > ___

Plug In

1999-01-12 Thread Matt Choate
Do you know where I can download the port of the Java Plug-in for Linux? Thanks Matt __ Matt Choate EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (617)679-5444 Senior Developer Enterprise Applications Group Cambridge Technology Partners 304 Vassar Street Cambridge, MA

Re: which linux/chip?

1999-01-12 Thread David Grimes
In response to the question about mesa and magician: Yes, Magician comes with a precompiled Mesa library in both static and dynamic forms. You can also use other versions of Mesa such as the 3d-fx accelerated but I have not tried and have no ideas about it's performance or viability. -Da

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Alex Chaffee
> > Newsgroups have a different audience and accessing method. I, for one, > > would probably stop following this list if it became a newsgroup. Slightly off-topic: Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone written a free, stable two-way bridge between email and nntp

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]:Mailing List Changes)

1999-01-12 Thread Martin Little
Armen Yampolsky wrote: > > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > > > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > > it. > > I agree absolutely. Slashdot? Reading the

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes)

1999-01-12 Thread Armen Yampolsky
> Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. I agree absolutely. Slashdot? Reading the posts are a nightmare! It is a classi

O'Reilly Linux Conference Call for Presenters

1999-01-12 Thread Matt Welsh
Hello, I'm the program chair for the O'Reilly Linux Conference (August 21-24, 1999 in Monterey, California). We're looking for talks and tutorials from Linux developers and enthusiasts to present at this conference, and I'd really like to encourage folks on these mailing lists to contribute. Al

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Richard Jones
blaise toad wrote: > > Like paul proposes, I honestly believe web based threaded discussion > are the best (a la slashdot). You obviously have free phone bills or something (unlike in the UK where you suck the 'net through a very narrow straw at very high cost). You can go to a web discussion if

Re: RMI-Question

1999-01-12 Thread peter . pilgrim
Soln: Use the RMI itself to implement an authentication protocol yourself ie get your clients to use a username and password if possible. The server verifies the username and password. In any case why would want to restrict the service just by machine name (host)? Far better to use a proper aut

Re: RMI-Question

1999-01-12 Thread mab
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Jan Suchanek wrote: > Hello! > > I am working on a project which uses RMI. I wrote a server which runs > very well. I problem I got is that every client is allowed to connect to > my server and call the remote methode. What I want is, that only hosts > who are allowed to

RMI-Question

1999-01-12 Thread Jan Suchanek
Hello! I am working on a project which uses RMI. I wrote a server which runs very well. I problem I got is that every client is allowed to connect to my server and call the remote methode. What I want is, that only hosts who are allowed to make a remote call can connect to my server. How can I ge

Re: which linux/chip

1999-01-12 Thread David Thompson
Thank you Kevin, for the direct, well put, inside inforamation. The remaining hitch for me (and others that I know) is the question of java 3d on these different platforms. Will blackdown be working on the java 3d port as well? And is there any reason to believe that java 3d will be working wi

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Matt Zagni
Is it fairly easy st set up a mailing list then ? How does one do it in linux - for general use ? Matt > Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:00:55 -0500 > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:10:45 +0800 (WST) > From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I'd like to do one of two things with this

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Karl Asha wrote: > > I'd like to do one of two things with this mailing list, as it's really > become a significant amount of traffic. Either move it to a newsgroup, Too open to spamming (we get too much now) and email-address harvesting. > or move it to a place willing

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Dimitris Vyzovitis
Robert McConnell wrote: > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. > I agree too. We don't need to be proactive in order t

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread David Warnock
> > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > > it. > > I agree. Mailing-list and newsgroup style discussions have much mo

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Pete Hardie
Robert McConnell wrote: > > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. I agree. Mailing-list and newsgroup style discussion

Re: which linux/chip?

1999-01-12 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, David Grimes wrote: > Hello, if you are interested in doing awesome > OpenGL in Java and don't wan't to wait for sun to get their ?$%# > together and write Java 3d for anything except windows > and sparc solaris I'd highly recommend you check out Magician. > Magician is

Re: setting up swing

1999-01-12 Thread Troy Wu
On older versions, it was necessary to set SWING_HOME to the path to your swing installation (e.g., /usr/local/swing-1.1). --troy On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Patrick wrote: You just need to set the CLASSPATH and export it in the bashrc and include the files for it. There are docs for

Re: setting up swing

1999-01-12 Thread Patrick
You just need to set the CLASSPATH and export it in the bashrc and include the files for it. There are docs for it with it. - On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Brett Jones wrote: > Could someone point me to some docs on setting up swing.