Maybe because NT is notorious for being very unfriendly to Java?
Seriously, though... I suspect there may be issues with Runtime.exec()
on NT due to permissions problems when you're logged in as a normal user
- try it as Administrator and see if it works then.
-Jeff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
My RedHat 5.2 CD included bzip2...
Tucker Balch wrote:
>
> Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to have java-linux even if I have to
> download and install bzip2 to use it. Still I think it's better
> to stick with more commonly available installation tools (and libraries
> and kernels for that matter
Umm... bzip2 is open source and freely available to anyone (I compiled
the binaries I use myself).
David Wall wrote:
>
> It was a bit rude as written, and that's part of the problem with email in
> general. Sometimes terse statements sound worse than the intended message
> was to be delivered.
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 17:47:18 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Does anyone know if the Sun hotjava browser is supposed to work
>under JDK1.2? I've had no luck to date -- failing on startup with
>AccessControlException. Wondering whether to suspect hotjava, 1.2,
>or the Linux port.
HotJava needs t
> I am developing a network performance benchmarking program with java. I
>have resently intalled jdk1.1.7 in my redhat5.1but i am getting very slow
>prefrormance. i.e. a for loop from 0 to 3x10^7 takes about 10 secs while
>when using vcafe in windows95 itneeds about 1 sec on the same machine. I
Does anyone know if the Sun hotjava browser is supposed to work
under JDK1.2? I've had no luck to date -- failing on startup with
AccessControlException. Wondering whether to suspect hotjava, 1.2,
or the Linux port.
Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am developing a network performance benchmarking program with java. I
> have resently intalled jdk1.1.7 in my redhat5.1but i am getting very slow
> prefrormance. i.e. a for loop from 0 to 3x10^7 takes about 10 secs while
> when using vcafe in windows95 itneeds about
G'day,
I noticed you mentioned you were interested in getting volunteers
for Java 3d, I'd be happy to help, I have a fairly extensive
background in graphics (does anyone else out there remember Iris GL?)
and a running Java 3d on Linux would be *very* useful to me.
Actually I'm pretty keen to se
Here is another way to connect to Oracle.
/* Start */
private Connection openConnection() {
Connection connection = null;
try {
// Register the database driver.
DriverManager.registerDriver( new oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver() );
// Attempt to open a
Tucker Balch wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to have java-linux even if I have to
> download and install bzip2 to use it. Still I think it's better
> to stick with more commonly available installation tools (and libraries
> and kernels for that matter).
>
> Is java-linux for kernel develop
Thanks to the advice of different guys, I can now run applets/GUI progs under RedHat
5.2/JDK 1.2 pre. I used to get segment violations in AWT procs.
A workaround is indeed to switch to HiColor 16bpp. Everything works fine now.
Thanks to the guys who ported the JDK and the ones who helped !
oeli
Here is a code snipplet that I use for connecting to an oracle rdbm
you may have to alter it somewhat to get it to work right for you, but I do
believe that with a little study you will have no problems.
~~ FYI: Oracle is probalby the hardest database to connect to ~~
/* S T
Hi, friends:
I got some proble to install/use JDBC. I am looking for help.
The problems are:
1. I install JAVA (jdk116_v5), JDBC (8.0.5 thin), and ORACLE (8.0.5) on my
linux
box (RH5.2 linux v2.0.35). The PATH and CLASSPATH are set up as following:
PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin:.
PATH=$P
Any error messages, exceptions thrown? Hangs? If so, blocks on what
line? What version of JDK?
I compiled it and ran it on my NT box with JDK1.2 (current release), and
it seems to work fine.
I have had problems before with JDK1.1 Process.waitFor() for some time
on NT(blocks forever under some co
Would it be possible for any of the blackdown developers to create a
binary distribution for glibc-2.1? Alternatively, I would be glad to
work with Linux diffs. A while back I made a move to glibc-2.1 and now I
am stuck without a working jdk since 1.1.7 does not work either and I do
not the 1.1.7
Nelson Minar writes:
> >Nobody has bzip2, whatever that is. You're making your product less portable.
Perhaps, the author intended to say "nobody with no clue has bzip2 or knows
what it is". Indeed this is a valid point, albeit delivered in a slightly
suboptimal way. If you are releasing pre-
> "TB" == Tucker Balch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TB> Is java-linux for kernel developers (100s of people) or the
TB> linux masses (millions)? I suppose Debian includes it, but
TB> RedHat 5.2 does not include bzip2, nor bzip2 capable tar.
Sorry to contradict you but bzip2 is an
OK. I surrender. --Tucker
Martin Little wrote:
>
> Tucker Balch wrote:
>
> > Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to have java-linux even if I have to
> > download and install bzip2 to use it. Still I think it's better
> > to stick with more commonly available installation tools (and libraries
> >
"David Wall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It was a bit rude as written, and that's part of the problem with email in
> general. Sometimes terse statements sound worse than the intended message
> was to be delivered.
You said "nobody uses bzip2", which is CLEARLY incorrect.
> While I am really
Hy,
I'm tired of reading Your discussion abut this zip thing.
Would You please stop it?
Thanks,
Gyuri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have some attached files. Basically Java program that
launches another Java AWT program.
% java Launcher
It works on Linux / Windows95 not on NT 4.0. Why?
Peter
launch~1.jav
hello~1.jav
Tucker Balch wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to have java-linux even if I have to
> download and install bzip2 to use it. Still I think it's better
> to stick with more commonly available installation tools (and libraries
> and kernels for that matter).
>
> Is java-linux for kernel devel
Don't get me wrong, I'm glad to have java-linux even if I have to
download and install bzip2 to use it. Still I think it's better
to stick with more commonly available installation tools (and libraries
and kernels for that matter).
Is java-linux for kernel developers (100s of people) or the linu
Cool I am a nobody now I thought that distributeing it using bzip2
was an excellent idea in that in promotes using bandwidth friendly
software and gets people using it.
Cheers
James.
Pooh Bear -- "I am just a bear of little brain"
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Tucker Balch wrote:
> Nobody has bz
It was a bit rude as written, and that's part of the problem with email in
general. Sometimes terse statements sound worse than the intended message
was to be delivered.
While I am really happy with the work that this free software team has been
doing, and I appreciate and make good use of their
Tucker Balch wrote:
>
> Nobody has bzip2, whatever that is. You're making your product less portable.
> If you do insist on keeping bzip2, you'll need to change your installation
> instructions because they reference gzip'd files.
Nobody has gzip, whatever that is. You're making your product l
In about the same time it took me to reply to
the complaint about nobody having bzip2, I found this url:
http://www.digistar.com/bzip2/index.html
That has binaries for most major OS's as well
as source.
Vann
--
Vann Hasty
Evans & Sutherland
> -Original Message-
> From: Tucker Balch [m
>Nobody has bzip2, whatever that is. You're making your product less portable.
It always amazes me when people using free software are rude to the
folks who are doing the work. Your message was impolite, and you were
too lazy to go find bzip2, thereby wasting everyone else's time.
You can get b
Lars Rusdorf writes:
> Hi,
>
> - download a libc5-version of jdk 1.2 (is there one ?)
There won't be one. We'll have to support glibc 2.0 and glibc 2.1; libc5 is
not something that we will have time to deal with.
Steve
--
Nobody has bzip2, whatever that is. You're making your product less portable.
If you do insist on keeping bzip2, you'll need to change your installation
instructions because they reference gzip'd files.
--Tucker
--
Tucker Balch
Computer Science Department
Carnegie Mellon University
http://www.
Hy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am developing a network performance benchmarking program
> with java. I have resently intalled jdk1.1.7 in my redhat5.1
> but i am getting very slow prefrormance. i.e. a for loop
> from 0 to 3x10^7 takes about 10 secs while when using vcafe in windows95 it
> needs
Dear Daniele,
Did you get any answers on your CORBA problem? I too am experiencing the same
anomaly. I'm using RedHat 5.2 Linux with JDK117_v1a, with Orbacus 3.1.2. I
get your error when I run the Client on a WindowsNT box, with the HelloWorld
Server running on my Linux box. When the client a
Hello everyone,
Im just switched over to 1.2 in linux (nice work!). Im facing one
problem. i dunno if it is a bug or correction in new release.
Using 1.1.7, the static method 'InetAddress.getLocalHost()' returns
the local machine address.
But the same in 1.2 returns some other diff
I am developing a network performance benchmarking program with java. I
have resently intalled jdk1.1.7 in my redhat5.1but i am getting very slow
prefrormance. i.e. a for loop from 0 to 3x10^7 takes about 10 secs while
when using vcafe in windows95 itneeds about 1 sec on the same machine. I a
I am developing a network performance benchmarking program
with java. I have resently intalled jdk1.1.7 in my redhat5.1
but i am getting very slow prefrormance. i.e. a for loop
from 0 to 3x10^7 takes about 10 secs while when using vcafe in windows95 it
needs about 1 sec on the same machine. I
Hi,
Has anybody run any benchmarks comparing jdk117 with tya vs jdk1.2 with
sunwjit?
My runs so far (console applications with timing), indicate that
***jdk1.1.7+tya1.2 is at least two times faster than jdk1.2-pre1!!!***
This behavior is for computationally intensive procedures, I don't refer
to
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 30, GUEYE Dame wrote:
> Can you help me with this error i get when i type java :
> /usr/rzrapp/jdk1.2/bin/i386/native_threads/java: error in loading shared
> libraries: /usr/rzrapp/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: undefined symbol:
> __divdi3
i think you used the glibc-version of
Hello
Can you help me with this error i get when i type java :
/usr/rzrapp/jdk1.2/bin/i386/native_threads/java: error in loading shared
libraries: /usr/rzrapp/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so: undefined symbol:
__divdi3
Regards
DG
---
39 matches
Mail list logo
