Re: jdk117_v2 done or still pending?

> John N Alegre writes: John> Could someone please claify. In the past day I have seen on John> this list references to "jdk117_v2_x86-glibc2.0 prerelease" John> and and "jdk117_v2". Are these still pre-releases of the John> jdk117 that will run with glibc version 2.2 (i.e.R

jdk117_v2 done or still pending?

Could someone please claify. In the past day I have seen on this list references to "jdk117_v2_x86-glibc2.0 prerelease" and and "jdk117_v2". Are these still pre-releases of the jdk117 that will run with glibc version 2.2 (i.e.RedHat 6.0) or is there still a FINAL release pending. Thanks for you

Re: Ability to reload class files

Ken McNeil writes: > > What I would like to know is this: how difficult > > would it be to reload the > > definition of a class if objects of the class had > > already been > > instantiated, then destroyed and garbage-collected? > > > java.lang.ClassLoader caches Class objects so that >

Re: Ability to reload class files

> What I would like to know is this: how difficult > would it be to reload the > definition of a class if objects of the class had > already been > instantiated, then destroyed and garbage-collected? > java.lang.ClassLoader caches Class objects so that > class files don't have > to be loaded or

RE: JDK 1.2 and SuSE 6.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > This is not true on my system!!! > JDK1.1.7 *without JIT* worked much faster than JDK1.2 with the JIT (any > chance > to check if the JIT was actually activated?) Well. Specify a non-existent JIT (which will make the JDK run in interpreted mode) an

Reporting bugs

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm curious; on the new JDK 1.2 status page, it says that if one knows of any bugs not listed there, one should report them. Well, what about the Jitterbug? Should I re-report bugs that are not on the status pages, even if they've already been repor

Ability to reload class files

Hi, Please excuse me for the lack of knowledge obvious in this question; I haven't ever worked with the JVM source. Also, I suppose this applies to all JVMs, but I'm interested in the Linux implementation, because, really, what else is there? :) What I would like to know is this: how difficult

Re: EmbeddedJava for Linux...

james terry wrote: > > Just wondering what you all think about Jeode from Insignia. I think it would be nice if Insignia's site actually said something :-). It runs on a "variety of operating systems such as..." Linux, and a "variety of processors such as..." x86, but when I try to ferret out wh

Unidentified subject!

Greetings, I am new to Linux and Java and would like some help. Can some one point me to some examples and information with using Java and database? I would apprechiate this very much. I have seen some literature on JDBC and am interested in this technology. ---

Re: Unidentified subject!

Sun's Java site has a pretty good set of tutorials and examples. Check them out at: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/index.html For more extensive demos, check out Sun's Java Developer site. You have to register to view the page, but registration is free: http://develo

EmbeddedJava for Linux...

Just wondering what you all think about Jeode from Insignia. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fax component for Java

Hi I am trying to write a application that allows you to fax from the client to a Linux Fax Server using Java component. Has anyone done this? Ong Boon Wee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

JDK1.1.7_v2 Where?

I have checked the mirrors from http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html and none of them show v2? Can anyone point me to its locations.. Thanks Steve Gee Java Developer Maxor National Pharmacies Information Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 806.324.5540 www.maxor.com 806.324.5400 ---

Re: JDK1.1.7v2

Yes... Papi On Mon, 10 May 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Greetings all, > ..and thank you for your quick replies to my last JDK problem. > > I was advised that JDK1.1.2v2 will run under the latest GLIBC versions (2.2) > Is this correct? > > Thanks all > > Steve

Re: Timer!!!

I think that might be a java specific question you might want to pose with source code to an advanced-java mailing list. Good luck. James. Pooh Bear -- "I am just a bear of little brain" On Mon, 10 May 1999, Rui Vale wrote: > Hello to everyone! > I'm working on an application tha

Timer!!!

Hello to everyone! I'm working on an application that involves lots of Threads and some Timers. I have a timer to show me the time (H:M:S) and when I click some menu window that timer simply stops. I expected it to continue. I allready tryed with a thread but the result was even wo

Re: JDK 1.2 and SuSE 6.1

Kontorotsui wrote: > > Sadly, it's also a huge memory hog compared to 1.1.7, so on my machine any > > larger app is much slower on 1.2. > > Yes... damn, it is a nightmare! > > I get 11 java processes, each one with size 81512 (RSS: 24324). > How can this happen?? 11 threads, not processes -- th

Re: Number Pad problem still exists in jdk117_v2

---On Sat, 8 May 1999 19:34:10 -0500, Kelly Campbell said > Hi, > > I've mailed this list before about problems with the number pad on linux > jdk117v_1a. I just tried it on the jdk117_v2_x86-glibc2.0 prerelease > version from wisp.net and it still exists. Basically it's bug id #365 in > the ji

JDK1.1.7v2

Greetings all, ..and thank you for your quick replies to my last JDK problem. I was advised that JDK1.1.2v2 will run under the latest GLIBC versions (2.2) Is this correct? Thanks all Steve Gee Java Developer Maxor National Pharmacies Information Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] 806.324.5540 www

RE: JDK 1.2 and SuSE 6.1

Am Mon, 10 May 1999 schrieb Kontorotsui: > On 09-May-99 Peter Schuller wrote: > >> 2) Should it be S slow?? > > I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm > > guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2 > > in > > general). > > I

RE: JDK 1.2 and SuSE 6.1

On 09-May-99 Peter Schuller wrote: >> 2) Should it be S slow?? > I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm > guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2 > in > general). I meant... so slow compared to JDK 1.1.7. I have a K6-II

Re: Thin client Java apps

Hi, More details would be needed about your exact application / problem domain, but I've done exactly what you're describing, and here's one combination of pieces you can put together to do it: (In other words, there's MANY ways to make a multi application - here's one way I've seen it work.