Re: ^CTYA problems: unresolved ref

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Stefan Proels wrote: > > > I'm trying to use TYA, puzzling over why JDK1.2 claims it cannot be > > found even though I specify LD_LIBRARY_PATH. So I tried running with > > JDK1.1: again tya failed, but I got this intriguing message: > > > > /usr/local/Java/tya1.3v2/libtya.so: undefined symbol: >

Re: how many threads are too much?

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
another limiting factor is memory consumption by the thread stacks... the defaults are a tad large JIC. If you know your pathlength is predictable and you don't have a lot of large objects in the call stack frames you can play with the max values via -oss and -ss (java stack and native stack resp

Re: TYA problems: unresolved ref

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
I've been using 1.3v2 with 1.1.7v3 since that combination became possible, with no problems at all, on a Debian system, 2.2.7, glibc 2.1. I do remember that I had to build tya myself from source to get it going in the first place; there was some problem with the Debian tya package at that time.

Re: ^CTYA problems: unresolved ref

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
> I'm trying to use TYA, puzzling over why JDK1.2 claims it cannot be > found even though I specify LD_LIBRARY_PATH. So I tried running with > JDK1.1: again tya failed, but I got this intriguing message: > > /usr/local/Java/tya1.3v2/libtya.so: undefined symbol: > min_javastack_chunk_size (libtya

TYA problems: unresolved ref

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
I'm trying to use TYA, puzzling over why JDK1.2 claims it cannot be found even though I specify LD_LIBRARY_PATH. So I tried running with JDK1.1: again tya failed, but I got this intriguing message: /usr/local/Java/tya1.3v2/libtya.so: undefined symbol: min_javastack_chunk_size (libtya.so) Is 1.3v

profiling under linux?

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Greets, So I have this big mucking system which is due for some speedups. I'd really like to profile it so that I can figure out exactly where said speeds ups are necessary (it is mucking complex, too, so I don't want to over engineer). The only profiler I've seen, OptimizeIt, is g

classpath

1999-06-17 Thread AAZ
Hi all, I have a jar file in specified in my CLASSPATH but yet java cannot find any of those classes. I have even xtracted the jar and java also cannot find them. It only finds them if they are in the root dir of my CLASSPATH... Any suggestions? Using 1.1.7 thanks -aaz -

Re: [Fwd: Come see new versions of Delphi & JBuilder!] will be a linux version?

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Can't tell you much but we will have Linux specific topics at the conference and we'll show "what's cooking" :) --Paolo > "JB" == os Molina writes: JB> [1 ] Hey guys check that from JB> Inprise, I hope version of linux would be released. JB> see you!

Re: RH6, jdk12 pre_v2 and missing Zapf Dingbats fonts : OK!

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Edoardo Comar wrote: > > Hi > I have solved my 'warning-missing Missing Zapf Dingbats font' problem' as > suggested in Known bugs, just that for those running RedHat6 there is some > difference with the install info in http://www.gimp.org/fonts.html . > > the difference is that RH6 uses a font

green threads, native threads and glibc2.0/2.1

1999-06-17 Thread Derek Glidden
I have some questions about threads and the JDK. I've read the README files and done some preliminary scouring of the 'net and list archives to no avail, but I haven't dug too deeply, and have just subscribed to this list, so forgive me if this is deeply covered elsewhere. I have access to two

RH6, jdk12 pre_v2 and missing Zapf Dingbats fonts : OK!

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Hi I have solved my 'warning-missing Missing Zapf Dingbats font' problem' as suggested in Known bugs, just that for those running RedHat6 there is some difference with the install info in http://www.gimp.org/fonts.html . the difference is that RH6 uses a font server, so you do not have to edit t

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Actually, you don't need to modify the .java files, and in fact, modifying the .java files is strictly prohibited in the license (as such modifications could potentially be misconstrued by the licensee as permission to change the apis). The license does permit personal use of your own port. If

VisualAge for Java for Linux

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Dear All, This is to let you know that IBM has released a technical preview of VisualAge for Java for Linux. I downloaded it and installed it in my Debian 2.0 box and the environment is the very same as the other versions they have with similar features and look. IBM stated that this technical pr

Re: how many threads are too much?

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
>The fact is I have for example a 12x12 matrix with at most 144 agents >running concurrently in each cell of the matrix, so the question 144 >threads are too much threads? I believe 144 threads should work OK on the Linux JDK. If you are using green threads, in theory there is no upper limit on t

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Thanks, I Think that u will find that 'any' distribution, and completed port now is considered commercial, therefor not for free ( i believe this extends even to yourself, for personel uses ). The Non-Commercial licenses appears to have bitten the dust when this OPENNESS was made. A proper p

how many threads are too much?

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Well I know you can tell me what is the answer, I will be representing some matrix with agents in there (no it isn't the movie :-) ). The fact is I have for example a 12x12 matrix with at most 144 agents running concurrently in each cell of the matrix, so the question 144 threads are too much thr

[Fwd: Come see new versions of Delphi & JBuilder!] will be a linux version?

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
Hey guys check that from Inprise, I hope version of linux would be released. see you! Dear Inprise Customer, COME CELEBRATE A DECADE OF AWARD-WINNING CONFERENCES 10th Annual Inprise & Borland Conference Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia July 17-21, 1999 FOR EASY REGISTRATION, VIS

Re: java- ARM PORTING

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
"vincent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > HAS ANYONE DONE ANY PORTING FRO THE ARM PROCESSOR.? > Can some one tell me where to look. -- +-+-+ | Peter Naulls - [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

RE: jdk1.2 installation

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
On 15-Jun-99 Vlad Beffa wrote: > I see libhpi.so in both /usr/local/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/green_threads and > .../native_threads, and libjava.so in /usr/local/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/. Is > there something else I need to do? I have jdk1.1.7 installed as well, and > I think the system has glibc on it. >

Re: jdk1.2 installation

1999-06-17 Thread Anonymous
I think I had this problems too when I've installed my java I found some errors in .java_wrapper try to corect them. On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, Stefan Proels wrote: > > > I had a couple of questions about installing the jdk1.2 (pre-v2) on i386. > > First, what is the .diffs file for and ho