Re: jdk1.5 and sparc

2006-09-06 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:43:51 +1000 Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok getting off topic here, nope ubuntu and freebsd partitions 160GB , > solaris only manages to see 130GB to partition on top of this the > original drive that was in my fire v100 rack is now not usable in > solaris as it

Re: jdk1.5 and sparc

2006-09-06 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 00:57:22 +1000 Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh well, it would have been really nice, ive gone back to installing > solaris 10, however it doesnt seem its progressed in any way at all. > I managed to get both freebsd and ubuntu installed in under 20 mins, > with solar

Re: jdk1.5 and sparc

2006-09-04 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:44:59 +1000 Jim Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/09/2006, at 11:28 PM, Stefaan A Eeckels wrote: > > > On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:18:07 +1000 > > Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> my last resort is of cours

Re: jdk1.5 and sparc

2006-09-04 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 22:18:07 +1000 Dan Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > my last resort is of course solaris 10. In my experience, on SPARC Solaris 10 is the superior OS. -- Stefaan -- As complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning, and meaningful statements lose precision. -- Lotfi Za

Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-03 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Wed, 3 May 2006 07:32:10 -0400 "Ioan - Ciprian Tandau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I told him about getFD().sync() (for FileInput/OutputStream and > RandomFile It seems to be the only way to make sure things are > synchronously written to disk (local storage). The fact that the file is ph

Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-03 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Tue, 02 May 2006 14:38:50 -0700 "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote: > > On Mon, 01 May 2006 13:41:12 -0700 > > "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Anyone know how a simple file copy can be accomp

Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-02 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Mon, 01 May 2006 13:41:12 -0700 "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone know how a simple file copy can be accomplished in an > explicitly synchronous manner without adding Thread.sleep(n) after > calling flush on the output stream? Have you tried the streams method from the same site: h

RE: JNI Question - I want to open a file for Read/Write

2001-02-07 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 07-Feb-2001 Santosh Dawara wrote: > I am trying to open a file in the usual way, (fopen) > However, fopen returns the an unusual NULL. At first > I thought I probably did not have permissions. > I am sure its not that. Check the errno after the fopen(). At least, you'll no longer ha

RE: JIT for Blackdown 1.1.8

2001-01-28 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 28-Jan-2001 Volker wrote: > does anybody know a JIT for 1.1.8??? TYA works quite well. Stefaan -- Ninety-Ninety Rule of Project Schedules: The first ninety percent of the task takes ninety percent of the time, and the last ten percent takes the other ninety percent. -

RE: Java on Red Hat linux 6.2

2000-07-11 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 11-Jul-2000 AMIT VERMA wrote: > then i referred a book java on linux > and also searched thru ur website for help. i came to > know i have to set env variables(JAVA_HOME, PATH and > CLASSPATH) That's positive, but you'd better also consult a book on UNIX/Linux... > > i used the followi

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

2000-06-09 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 09-Jun-2000 Avi Cherry wrote: > >I'm not one of the kernel folk, but can you give me an example of > >an application that would be impossible without hundreds of threads? > >Or even one that would significantly benefit from hundreds of threads? > > Easy. How about any sort of stateful serv

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

2000-06-09 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 09-Jun-2000 Michael Thome wrote: > I think the best answer is to do the second tier threading in userspace > (best would be in glibc). The kernel folks have some good points > about doing it the kernel but seem to have a mental block as to why > you'd *ever* want hundreds of threads in a

RE: Patents

1998-12-08 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 08-Dec-98 Ray Racine wrote: > One thing and one thing only matters and that is the CLAIMS section of > the patent which is usually at the end of the patent. YOU BEAT A PATENT > BY GETTING AROUND THE CLAIMS. Thanks for the information, Ray (and congrats on the patent(s) :-) I did read thr

Re: [FYI] Java violates US patent?

1998-12-07 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
Sorry for continuing this fairly off-topic thread, but IMHO it has some relevance to the use of Java on Linux (if even a little :-) The full text of the patent can be accessed under the following URL: http://164.195.100.11/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=/n etahtml/srchnu

RE: [FYI] Java violates US patent?

1998-12-07 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 07-Dec-98 Jaco Greeff wrote: > > Found a link to this article on JavaLobby: > > > > http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit19981203.html > > > > Could turn out bad. Very bad. > > Maybe in a certain sense, but remember that Java is not only used in > Web-wide applets, also application

Re: Compilation hardware

1998-08-29 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 29-Aug-98 Dan Kegel wrote: > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote: > > I have a dual PII-266 (Intel Dakota, with 128Mb and SCSI disks > > and I compile the Linux kernel in about 7 minutes, honest). > > How long does it take if you disable one CPU? What speed > disks (7200

RE: Compilation hardware

1998-08-28 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 28-Aug-98 Jerry Treweek wrote: > > There is a bewildering plethora of choice out there and I would be > interested in seeing what opinions and experiences the java-linux > community had to offer in respect of selecting components for a > compilation machine, specifically, > > CPU > Ch

RE: How many sockets can you serve?

1998-06-30 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 30-Jun-98 Charles Forsythe wrote: > I have a simple client/sever benchmark (code below) designed to see how > many simultanious open sockets I can sustain. The answer seems to be > about 250. This is really sad because the crufty HP-UX JDK 1.1.3 > managed to make it to 1200. The excepti

Re: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage

1998-06-16 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On 16-Jun-98 Juergen Kreileder wrote: > Not necessarily. > > Try > strace -e trace=open java Iview Valetta.jpg > to see which libjpeg.so gets loaded. > On my system there is a libjpeg.so in the jdk directory (this is > the one that should get loaded) and there is a libjpeg.so in /usr/lib

Re: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage

1998-06-16 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
Hi List, I did some more tests, and I have the following frustrating results: - JDK1.1.3 on Linux 2.0.34 (heavily updated Slackware 95) gives no problems (this is an older 486/66 machine too slow to do serious java work) - I exported the JDK directory from this machine, mounted it on the Pentium

Re: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage

1998-06-16 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
Jürgen, > IMHO this states that the native method readImage couldn't be linked. > Do a nm on your libjpeg.so, it should give something like that: > > 123> nm /public/languages/JDK-1.1.6v2/lib/i686/green_threads/libjpeg.so | > grep readImage > 000103e4 T Java_sun_awt_image_JPEGImageDecoder_

Re: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage

1998-06-15 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
Albrecht, > > java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage > > at sun.awt.image.JPEGImageDecoder.produceImage(JPEGImageDecoder.java:137) > > at > > sun.awt.image.InputStreamImageSource.doFetch(InputStreamImageSource.java:265 > > ) > > at sun.awt.image.ImageFetcher.fetchloop(ImageFetcher.java:151)

RE: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage

1998-06-15 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
Hi List, Sorry to follow up on my own message, but it was late yesterday night, and I should have added the complete error message. Here it is: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage at sun.awt.image.JPEGImageDecoder.produceImage(JPEGImageDecoder.java:137) at sun.awt.image.InputStreamImageS

java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage

1998-06-14 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
Hi List, I've just subscribed (and just installed jdk1.1.6-v1 on my Linux 2.0.34 S.u.S.E based box, and I get the following error when running some of the demo programs: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: readImage I also get this with tya's Iview demo package. Sorry if this is a FAQ, but www.mai