Hello,
I have some kind of file system permissions problem.
I installed the native threads jdk-1.1.7 on my Red Hat machine
(6.0, 6.2??). When I run javac, I get a complaint about
inability to create a file in /proc. The permissions on
/proc look OK. Any help?
Bill Halchin
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
> There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
> got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
> error messa
The package name changed to javax.swing. That's also the case with
reasonably recent releases of Swing1.1 for JDK1.1.
Nathan
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 04:33:36PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
> There is no proble
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:33:36 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi:
>
>I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
>There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
>got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
>err
Hi:
I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
error message is "Package com.sun.java.swing.* not found in import". W
My thanks to everyone for the replies about thread interleaving. The
other thing I'm still trying to sort out is this issue with native
threads in jdk 1.1.7v3 and redhat 6.0 (with glibc 2.1). There seems to
be a library mismatch or something. A simple threaded p
My thanks to everyone for the replies about thread interleaving. The
other thing I'm still trying to sort out is this issue with native
threads in jdk 1.1.7v3 and redhat 6.0 (with glibc 2.1). There seems to
be a library mismatch or something. A simple threaded program runs fine
with native thr
Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is "known behaviour". The thread spec is very vague in regard to how
> it is supposed to work. There have been numerous discusions on the list
[...]
> but actually a statement of the technology's threading quality (or lack
> thereof as the case may
This is "known behaviour". The thread spec is very vague in regard to how
it is supposed to work. There have been numerous discusions on the list
in the past, check the archives for them. It basically boils down that
there is no gaurentee in the threading spec that multiple threads will
be interle
Hi Everyone,
I am seeing strange behavior in the way threads are switched in java
1.1.7v3. This is on a RedHat Linux 6.0 system (kernel 2.2.5-22, with
glibc 2.1). I have the jdk and native-threads packages for glibc on X86
from blackdown.org.
Problem 1: If I start 3 threads at the same prior
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 18:03:23 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>It turns out I had to put the library paths in /etc/ld.so.conf and run
>"ldconfig".
That should not be needed. If that was the case then something
was set up wrong. The .java_wrapper script (which is what the bin/java
command
I dealt with this problem not a week ago. You need to edit your dynamic
lookup file /etc/ld.so.conf to include the path of the shared object file.
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am new to Java on Linux. I followed all of the directions on
>
It turns out I had to put the library paths in /etc/ld.so.conf and run
"ldconfig".
Thanks
__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: Re: Having problems running 1.1.7
Author: "Michael Sinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at TI
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 12:41:57 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am new to Java on Linux. I followed all of the directions on
> Blackdown's web site on how to install Java and I keep getting the
> error:
>
> > java -version
> java: error in loading shared li
Hello,
I am new to Java on Linux. I followed all of the directions on
Blackdown's web site on how to install Java and I keep getting the
error:
> java -version
java: error in loading shared libraries: libjava.so: cannot open
shared object file: No such file o
I've downloaded for installation on
an i386 machine running Red Hat Linux 6.0.
The readme says "All Java-Linux ports share a common set of source
patches. These are located in the 'common' directory for each major
JDK revision." For the revision I've downloaded, that would be the
file . Do I
Hello,
When I attempt to invoke java I get the following error:
./../bin/alpha_21164a/green_threads/java: error in loading shared
libraries: ./../lib/alpha_21164a/green_threads/libjava_dl.so: undefined
symbol: _dl_default_scope
I am running an alpha Linux system using RedHat 6.0.
Has anybody ru
comb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, September 17, 1999 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: Reinstall 1.1.7
>Surjan Singh wrote:
>>
>> I always thought that you _don't_ need the classpath. If you have your
>> PATH variable correctly
Surjan Singh wrote:
>
> I always thought that you _don't_ need the classpath. If you have your
> PATH variable correctly (for the release you want to use, e.g.
> /usr/local/jdk1.2/bin) then you don't need to worry about anything else.
>
> The only reason you would want your CLASSPATH set, is if
libraries you want your compiler/java/appletviewer to see.
If you want to remove a release of the JDK just remove the folder and
its contents.
Rachel Greenham wrote:
>
> Tom Whitcomb wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I've got 1.2 installed and I want to remove it and
Tom Whitcomb wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I've got 1.2 installed and I want to remove it and reinstall 1.1.7. How do
> I uninstall 1.2? Do I just delete the 1.2 directories? What about the
> support for the automatic CLASSPATH?
>
> Thanks for any help,
Well, under Su
All,
I've got 1.2 installed and I want to remove it and reinstall 1.1.7. How do
I uninstall 1.2? Do I just delete the 1.2 directories? What about the
support for the automatic CLASSPATH?
Thanks for any help,
Tom
__
Get Your Private,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitris Terzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 August 1999 14:53
> To: 'Java-Linux mailing list'
> Subject: RE: Problems installing JDK 1.1.7 and JDK 1.2 pre-v2
[snip]
> What happened is that, to download the tar fi
; >What happened is that, to download the tar files, I used an NT machine,
> >linked to my Linux PC via Samba. So far so good. But, being lazy in typing
> >"tar -xvf" under Linux, I used WinZip to un-tar and then copied the
> >extracted files into the Linux JDK directory (
d to my Linux PC via Samba. So far so good. But, being lazy in typing
>"tar -xvf" under Linux, I used WinZip to un-tar and then copied the
>extracted files into the Linux JDK directory (1.1.7 or 1.2, respectively)
>directly. Well, I don't know why (please somebody explain
> +I know have a silly problem with JDK 1.1.7. Namely, while I can compile
my
> +application (containing several .java files organised in a number of
> +packages), when I attempt to run it, it doensn't run! My environment is
> + $JAVA_HOME =
> + $CLASSPATH = .:$JAVA_
Hello again...
I think I 've solved most of the silly problems I was experiencing, thanks
for your help and advises...
The only one remaining is a NullPointerException I 'm getting when launching
my application from JDK 1.1.7. It has to do with the initial JFrame. The
interpreter res
+I know have a silly problem with JDK 1.1.7. Namely, while I can compile my
+application (containing several .java files organised in a number of
+packages), when I attempt to run it, it doensn't run! My environment is
+ $JAVA_HOME =
+ $CLASSPATH = .:$JAVA_HOME/lib/classe
s into the Linux JDK directory (1.1.7 or 1.2, respectively)
directly. Well, I don't know why (please somebody explain), but with this
procedure I kinda "lost" files during the WinZip extraction!!! The jdk/bin
directory contained only a few of the scripts, (.java_wrapper, java-rmi.cgi,
Dimitris Terzis wrote:
>
> Nathan,
>
> > > I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
> > > bin/x86/native_threads directory each time (by the way, examining the
> > > scripts I see references to sun.tools.* classes - are they included in
> the
> > > libraries?).
> >
>
> Dimitris Terzis writes:
Dimitris> I am aware of this trickery, except that my
Dimitris> /bin subdirectory does not contain
Dimitris> any of the scripts(!). They 're all under
Dimitris> /bin/x86/.../native_threads. And
Dimitris> they don't do anything when I run them!
> Nathan Meyers writes:
Nathan> Don't try to run from those directories. The launch
Nathan> scripts do a lot of important setup. You need to invoke
Nathan> the scripts (java, javac, etc.) found in the
Nathan> /bin subdirectory - you shouldn't be
Nathan> in that directory
Nathan,
> > I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
> > bin/x86/native_threads directory each time (by the way, examining the
> > scripts I see references to sun.tools.* classes - are they included in
the
> > libraries?).
>
> Don't try to run from those directories.
Dimitris Terzis wrote:
>
> Hi guys...
>
> I am getting all sorts of problems with JDK 1.1.7 and JKD 1.2 installation
> in Linux (I have a Pentium II/300 system with RedHat 5.2 and libc-2.0.7.so).
> I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
> b
Hi guys...
I am getting all sorts of problems with JDK 1.1.7 and JKD 1.2 installation
in Linux (I have a Pentium II/300 system with RedHat 5.2 and libc-2.0.7.so).
I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
bin/x86/native_threads directory each time (by the way
Ratkai Peter wrote:
> HI there,
>
> I have downloaded and instaled JDK 1.1.7, Version 1a. After setting the
> PATH variable, and issuing the command `java` it segfaults.
> I'm not a java guru, especially this is the first time installing java on
> linux. I have a glibc sys
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:02:29 +0200 (CEST), Ratkai Peter wrote:
>HI there,
>
>I have downloaded and instaled JDK 1.1.7, Version 1a. After setting the
>PATH variable, and issuing the command `java` it segfaults.
>I'm not a java guru, especially this is the first time installi
HI there,
I have downloaded and instaled JDK 1.1.7, Version 1a. After setting the
PATH variable, and issuing the command `java` it segfaults.
I'm not a java guru, especially this is the first time installing java on
linux. I have a glibc system, and also have libc-5 librarys installed.
(D
Hi all.
I was using the Blackdown port of the JDK version 1.1.7 v1a
on a Debian Linux box when I ran into this bug in the port.
Here is a small piece of code that reproduces the bug and
the output on a Sun Solaris box vs my Linux box. I am also
going to put a bug report in the jitterbug database
I've been haveing some probelms with the appletviewer and displaying
graphics/swing over a remote x session with 1.1.7v1. I've never actually gotten
it to work. The frame shows up, however it's blank, and remains so.
Does 1.1.7v3 or 1.2 take care of this?
It's just me? Have i missed something?
> classes.zip. Is that file gone from 1.2?
>
> Unrelated - the Java-lInux FAQ suggests running a test with appletviewer
> to verify a working jdk. Did the stand-alone applets dissapear between
> JDK 1.1.6 and 1.1.7?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Steve Greene
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
appens when you switch from glibc 2.0 to glibc 2.1...
(The dl_symbol_value went away)
>Unrelated - the Java-lInux FAQ suggests running a test with appletviewer
>to verify a working jdk. Did the stand-alone applets dissapear between
>JDK 1.1.6 and 1.1.7?
Huh? What do you mean "s
ava-lInux FAQ suggests running a test with appletviewer
to verify a working jdk. Did the stand-alone applets dissapear between
JDK 1.1.6 and 1.1.7?
Thanks.
Steve Greene
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Is the JDK 1.1.7 port compatible with Caldera's OpenLinux 2.2 (2.2 kernel?)
I am interested in getting this distribution, primarily for the KDE desktop,
but I need to know if the JDK will work first.
Thanks in advance,
Peter An
his is a problem with the Blackdown
> JVM or with Swing pre Java 1.2. Under JDK 1.2 on NT, the attached code
> works as I expect it to, i.e. if I click in a TextField, I see a caret
> and the event-listeners get events when I click, press enter etc.
> Under Blackdown 1.1.7 with Swing 1.1
.
Under Blackdown 1.1.7 with Swing 1.1.1 Beta 2, there is no caret if I
click in one of the JTextFields, and I don´t get any events from the
listener. I don´t have a win-machine with jdk1.1.7 and Swing handy to
test there.
Thanks
Jerry
--8<-- cut here
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.ev
Hi,
Most probably I missed this discussion, but I could not find any
references in the mail archive.
I am running JDK 1.1.7 on RH5.2 with AcceleratedX 5.0. As soon as I
try to run AWT based program, I got coredump with the following
messages:
current locale is not supported in X11
This may be a swing bug... I seem to remember something about latter versions
of swing not working with 11x, but working with 12 in similar situations...
something about a change (bug fix) in the event model for 11x that early swing
was expecting to be broken, and newer swing is expecting to be fi
Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> java.sun.com and then go to (on the left panel) Java Foundation
> Classes, all of them should be in there. Get 1.1 final or 1.1.1beta, I
> don't know how stable the beta is though.
I got also JFC 1.1 and 1.1.1 beta 2 (from java.developer.com) and both
of them don't work wi
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
>
> I am using a jdk 1.1.7-v1a version on a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
>
> I am using also a swingall.jar version (I don't know how to find the
> SWING version) that has 2196234 bytes long.
>
> Using an AWT TextField I can use the numeric keypa
Hello,
I am using a jdk 1.1.7-v1a version on a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
I am using also a swingall.jar version (I don't know how to find the
SWING version) that has 2196234 bytes long.
Using an AWT TextField I can use the numeric keypad to enter digits.
Using a SWING JTextField the numeric k
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
>
> sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("-MM-dd");
> sdf.setLenient(false);
> try {
> thedate = sdf.parse(s);
Hi,
I've gotten good results by using the SimpleDateFormat constructor with this signatur
re in
- in some timezones it works, in others it doesn't.
The problems are fixed in JDK 1.2
regards
[ bryce ]
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk 1.1.7-v1a-glibc
> I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350
>>>>> "Constantin" == Constantin Teodorescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Constantin> Hello all, I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk
Constantin> 1.1.7-v1a-glibc I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
Constantin> with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350 MHz
Hello all,
I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk 1.1.7-v1a-glibc
I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350
MHz/64 Mb RAM
I am setting a new SimpleDateFormat with "-MM-dd" parsing format and
I'm trying to parse and use some dates.
Curiously, the
>I'm about to switch kernels, primarily because the jni isn't working
>properly with my current configuration (I'm currently still using a
>libc5 kernel). Which kernel is most likely to work well with JDK
>1.1.7, particularly with the jni?
>
>Also, might native
I realize that a question about 1.1.7 may seem a bit antiquated at this
point, but at present I need stability more than 1.2-ness.
I'm about to switch kernels, primarily because the jni isn't working
properly with my current configuration (I'm currently still using a libc5
kernel)
Have you taken a look at your /etc/nsswitch.conf file? Do you have any "nis"
entries? If so, get rid of them and leave things to files and dns. Depending on
what software is running you may be experiencing nis timeouts (because you
aren't running nis) under 2.2.
Dirk Leas wrote:
> Anybody else b
Anybody else benchmarked this combination against the same with the 2.0.36
kernel? It's more than a magnitude slower! One note, I built everything from
source except for the JDK which I'm running from the tar content.
Under 2.0.36, the above combination runs faster than IIS 4.0 + ServletExec
2.x!
> I'm a new Linux user. I used Ultrix and Solaris (with tcsh) for
> several years, but I've been using NT almost exclusively for about a
> year.
So thanks for your forbearance with my Linux inadequacies ...
> I'm using an RH5.2 box that already has a working JDK 1.1
I'm a new Linux user. I used Ultrix and Solaris (with tcsh) for
several years, but I've been using NT almost exclusively for about a
year.
I'm using an RH5.2 box that already has a working JDK 1.1.7 installed.
(It had a $CLASSPATH which I unset.) I downloaded the preview Java2
> I wondering if anyone had info on java printing w/1.1.7
Does this help?
import javax.swing.*;
import javax.swing.event.*;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.io.*;
public class PrintTest extends JFrame implements ActionListener {
private sta
I am puzzled by the interaction between non java object allocated in
the heap and the java GC. Where can I find the source files for the
native thread implementation of the JDK 1.1.7 v1a?
Cheers,
-- Georges
--
To
I wondering if anyone had info on java printing w/1.1.7
I can only find tutorials on the 1.2 jdk printing ... from
the mailing list it seems you can print from 1.1.7.
A tutorial site or better yet sample printing code would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Tom McMichael
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:37:00 -0500, Bruce R Miller wrote:
>Hi all;
> Would the problem with jdk 1.1.7 and glibc-2.0.1xx be solved simply by
>re-make-ing the system? This has solved some other similar problems for me.
>(or does extensive, painful, testing have to be done?)
Well, th
Hi all;
Would the problem with jdk 1.1.7 and glibc-2.0.1xx be solved simply by
re-make-ing the system? This has solved some other similar problems for me.
(or does extensive, painful, testing have to be done?)
If it's simple -- and assuming jdk 1.2 isn't right around the corner -- w
>>I was trying to initialise java.util.Date from substrings which I'd miscalculated.
Quite
happily accepted a month of 0 (it adjusted the year to suit).<<
As strange as it may seem the Docs for the
java.util.Date package states( take particular notice of the statement
about the month
values)
From
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Ryan Sutter wrote:
> This method allows incorrect dates like 13/9/98 without complaining. My
Looks good here.
The classes java.util.GregorianCalendar java.util.Date java.util.Calendar
java.sql.Date are spastic. Most of the methods in java.util.Date ar
deprecated. Between t
Ryan Sutter wrote:
>
> I don't know for sure that this specific to Linux Java so my apologies
> in advance. I am using this code for date validation:
>
> DateFormat df = new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/");
> try {
> Date theDate = df.parse(the
I don't know for sure that this specific to Linux Java so my apologies
in advance. I am using this code for date validation:
DateFormat df = new SimpleDateFormat("MM/dd/");
try {
Date theDate = df.parse(theText);
jtf.set
Hi!
Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did native threads ever achieve production quality in Linux JDK 1.1?
> I never had much luck with them on Linux 2.0... tended to dump core
> on me.
In kernels 2.2.0pre <= 7 I had no problems: I had run jpython (like a
shell) + together + netbeans i
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Michael Sinz wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:24:40 -0500, Warren Johnson wrote:
>
> >I have a web page that can be accessed with a browser (IE4 and Netscape)
> >called Build the Snowman. On the left frame is the beginning template of
> >the snowman on the right frame is stu
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:24:40 -0500, Warren Johnson wrote:
>I have a web page that can be accessed with a browser (IE4 and Netscape)
>called Build the Snowman. On the left frame is the beginning template of
>the snowman on the right frame is stuff like clothes, hats, etc... On the
>bottom you hit
Hi,
It seems that you are using getImage to transfer the image back and
forth.
Is there any particular reason to use the toolkit to fetch the image
for processing?
You can perfectly fetch the image using a stream and then use a PixelGrabber
to reconstruct the image in memory (and process it).
The
Netscape Enterprise Server. Moved it to a Redhat 5.2 machine with
> more memory and disk space with the latest Apache Web Server and this is JDK
> 1.1.7. When I create the picture via my browser, the Apache error log shows
> the following:
>
> _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't
Ok, same questions:
>My kneejerk response is to ask if X is running on the server and
>to ask if your DISPLAY environment variable is set properly for user "nobody"
or
>whoever your using for the web user. eg. "host.mynet.com:0.0"
If you'd like to send me the url for page (or is it an intranet) a
PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Jdk 1.1.7 and X-Server
>
>
> I need a little more info. I understand that this is an
> application that is
> called as a CGI by Apache? Is it then supposed to display something on the
> server's X display while it works? (This seems like a tall o
I need a little more info. I understand that this is an application that is
called as a CGI by Apache? Is it then supposed to display something on the
server's X display while it works? (This seems like a tall order with possibly
several hundred users on the web side but it may make sense for your
JDK
1.1.7. When I create the picture via my browser, the Apache error log shows
the following:
_X11TransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111
java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as
the value of the DISPLAY variable.
at su
Did native threads ever achieve production quality in Linux JDK 1.1? I never had
much luck with them on Linux 2.0... tended to dump core on me.
> Argh!!
>
> with java -native ANYCLASSFILE, I had:
>
> **
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> stackbase=BF9FFE70, stackpoin
Argh!!
with java -native ANYCLASSFILE, I had:
**
SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
stackbase=BF9FFE70, stackpointer=BF9FF9E0
Full thread dump:
"TimerQueue" (TID:0x406788d8, sys_thread_t:0x846d858, state:CW, thread_t: t@7175,
sp:0x2f4f4f threadID:0x1947, stack_base:
Well, it looks like my problem is with lesstif. I turned on
"DYN_JAVA=true", and re-ran, and found that the pre-build JDK also
crapped out with a SEGV.
And green_threads worked.
So it looks like the common thread is that if I'm using lesstif, I
can't use native_threads -- it croaks big time.
I got the prebuilt AWT binaries for jdk117v1a, both native-threads and
green-threads versions, and they work just fine on my Linux Debian 2.0
box.
I then rebuilt, using the combination of
jdk-1.1.7-v1a.diffs.gz
JDK1_1_7K.solwin32.31_Aug_98.zip
lesstif 0.83
libc6 2.0.7t
and found that both
I have been reporting problems with JNI/Invocation
with JDK 1.1.7v1a+native for apps that use libdl.so,
a bug which has been confirmed by Blackdown.
By accident I discovered a quick patch on this problem
that seems to work fine on my Debian "slink" snapshot,
so if you happen to be stuck with a
On 01-Dec-98 Kontorotsui wrote:
>I get this message:
>
>/usr/local/java/bin/../bin/checkVersions: /tmp/ldd.out.889: Permission denied
>
If you remember, someone told me to set an enviroment variable to tell Java
not to bother with the version check.
After I upgraded my libs, the message disappe
On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, Kontorotsui wrote:
>
> On 03-Dec-98 John Summerfield wrote:
> >> [About parse method]
> >> Should I do a bug report to the Java developers?
> >
> >That is a good idea.
> >It would be sensible first to verify it in an applet in Netscape (which
> >does not use the Blackdown por
there also in a Solaris 1.2 JDK, which should have
been released directly by JavaSoft. Should this be enough as a proof that it's
not a problem with the Blackdown port?
Of course I have also the code that shows the bug.
>>
>> Anyway, here is a real Linux port JDK 1.1.7-v1a proble
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Kontorotsui wrote:
>
> On 26-Nov-98 Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
> [About parse method]
>
> >Get 1.1.7-v1a and try again, 1.1.7 has some bugfixes for the parse methods.
>
> I got the 1.1.7-v1a and the bug is still there. The blanks are not skipped
On 26-Nov-98 Juergen Kreileder wrote:
[About parse method]
>Get 1.1.7-v1a and try again, 1.1.7 has some bugfixes for the parse methods.
I got the 1.1.7-v1a and the bug is still there. The blanks are not skipped,
while in the docs it is clearly written that they should be.
>The parse-m
i have a fairly complex application that at one point involves the
interaction of 2 threads:
thread1 synchronizes on object1 and wait()s.
thread2 waits for some network input and then does some processing,
then tries to notifyAll() on object1.
however, thread1 has already continued processing. t
I had some problems while trying to install JDK(main being, I couldn't
figure out how to install it!). Could you help me somehow?
Hi,
I'm probably asking a dumb question, but hope springs eternal...I'm sort of
hoping the README isn't up to date...
Can Java Activator run on JDK 1.1.7+TYA? (or even without TYA). I don't relish
having to have two distinct JDK versions on the same machine, what with a
.html
-
Name: jdk Distribution: (none)
Version : 1.1.7 Vendor: (none)
Release : 1a.glibc Build Date: Wed Nov 11 18:58:23 1998
Install date: Wed Nov 11 19:46:06 1998 Build Host: anna.inf.u-szeged.hu
Your Blackdown Java-Linux porting group would like to announce that
the JDK 1.1.7 should now be available. The big surprise is that we
now have a native threads add-on package for it too. (Thanks to Phill)
Make sure you read the README.native_threads for some details as to
what to expect. (It
Announcing: JDK 1.1.7 for MkLinux, Linux-PMac, and LinuxPPC
New in this Port
* This is our v1 port of Sun's JDK 1.1.7 final.
- includes numerous bug fixes direct from Sun
- fix for kernel accept() bug, caused slow Java Web Server
- turn-off by: e
by the way,
in iomgr.c you may have to tell it to open something...
"sbb: you need to open libc by hand -- good luck -- most of the
+ * "
jw
Filipe Custsdio wrote:
> I spent this weekend trying to get JDK 1.1.7 to compile. After patching
> the sources with the JDK1.1.6v5 diffs, I applied the diffs that "patch"
> rejected manually.
I did the same using slackware libc5, it works ok, but i only applied the
rejects wh
I spent this weekend trying to get JDK 1.1.7 to compile. After patching
the sources with the JDK1.1.6v5 diffs, I applied the diffs that "patch"
rejected manually.
I finally have a compilable JDK 1.1.7. Unfortunately, it segfaults on
trying to run anything. I'll try to track down
I have got the JDK 1.1.7 to build using the 1.1.6v4a diffs, and can run simple
programs without the awt. I understand there is not a lot of point to this and i
am more than happy to wait for the porting team to work their magic, but it has
certainly been a very useful learning exercise for
-Mensaje original-
De: Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: miércoles 7 de octubre de 1998 14:11
Asunto: JDK 1.1.7 source released yet?
>Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
>yet? Sun ke
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
