Who needs a GUI Builder? Ever try creating an extremely complex UI
with many components and combinations of layout managers( like GridBagLayout ).
Sure if you are building server side EJBs , Servlets or non-visual Beans you
won't
need a GUI Builder but for any thing else I think it is absolutely e
Kirk Hutchinson made the following typo:
> I assume you are able
> to serf the web from every machine on your lan?
Isn't that what Microsoft is trying to do?
Yours faithfully,
--
__ /__ Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ http://www.uq.net.au/~zzpwest
/ "Lord, to whom shall
On Wed, 23 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SAYS WHO???
>
> The BEST IDE for JAVA (better than SVC), is NETBEANS...
>
> try http://www.netbeans.com... it is 100% swing based. u need JDK1.1.6 (not
> 1.1.7/1.1.5).
> and linux kernel > 2.0.32
But NetBeans is extremely slow on even good Pentium
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> SAYS WHO???
>
> The BEST IDE for JAVA (better than SVC), is NETBEANS...
>
> try http://www.netbeans.com... it is 100% swing based. u need JDK1.1.6 (not
> 1.1.7/1.1.5).
Actually, I'm running NetBeans on JDK1.1.7v1a with TYA. Its a little
flakey. Some of the dialogs
Ok, ok, I admit that I have never added JDE to Emacs or XEmacs to see how
it would perform. I used to use XEmacs extensively when I used a Solaris
machine at work, and I enjoyed it. If I would call Kawa an IDE, I suppose
XEmacs could also be called an IDE. However, my main distinction between
a
ginal Message-
> From: Kirk Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 10:06 PM
> To: linux java
> Subject: Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
>
> First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it.
>
> It's really
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> SAYS WHO???
>
> The BEST IDE for JAVA (better than SVC), is NETBEANS...
not sure if it's the best, but I've found I like it, too.
> try http://www.netbeans.com... it is 100% swing based. u need JDK1.1.6 (not
> 1.1.7/1.1.5).
Hmmm...I'm sure I've run it with 1.1.7.
On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 11:11:08AM +0100, Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
>
> > John Goerzen wrote:
> >
> > I personally do not use highly integrated IDEs and it seems that you do
> > not also, but do not think that Xemacs is an IDE - it is just very smart
>
SN costs too much... and last I checked the free version did not save.
--jason
On 22-Dec-98 David Lucas wrote:
> Have not looked at it in a while, but Source Navigator from Cygnus folks
> might be worth looking at.
>
> Check out www.cygnus.com for more info.
>
> Later,
> Dave
>
> --
>
> +-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux java <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 1998 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
>First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it.
>
>It's really too bad that more IDEs are not available for Linux.
>
> I believe there is a family of development tools referred to as RAD .
> Apparently VisualAge and Visual Cafe are members of this family.
> A RAD gives you the tool to drag and drop GUI elements such as labels
> buttons. I would love to see a RAD for linux.
I invite you to download and tryout Si
I believe there is a family of development tools referred to as RAD . Apparently
VisualAge and Visual Cafe are members of this family.
A RAD gives you the tool to drag and drop GUI elements such as labels buttons. I
would love to see a RAD for linux.
Other than Visual Cafe the rest of the IDE and
Have not looked at it in a while, but Source Navigator from Cygnus folks
might be worth looking at.
Check out www.cygnus.com for more info.
Later,
Dave
--
++
| David Lucas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| Lucas So
On Tue, Dec 22, 1998 at 11:11:08AM +0100, Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
> John Goerzen wrote:
>
> I personally do not use highly integrated IDEs and it seems that you do
> not also, but do not think that Xemacs is an IDE - it is just very smart
> editor. What it lacks ?
>
> Graphical composition of
pport JDK1.2 with regard
> to using the latest swing components?
>
> Steve Delahunty
> Mullion Communications
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kirk Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 10:06 PM
> To: linux j
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 10:06:10PM -0500, Kirk Hutchinson wrote:
>
> > First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it.
>
> You obviously know little about it then. It has built-in and (virtually)
> seamless interfaces to compilers
Steve Delahunty
Mullion Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kirk Hutchinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 1998 10:06 PM
To: linux java
Subject: Re: An IDE for C and JAVA
First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it.
John Goerzen wrote:
> > It's really too bad that more IDEs are not available for Linux.
>
> What do these give you that XEmacs doesn't?
I personally do not use highly integrated IDEs and it seems that you do
not also, but do not think that Xemacs is an IDE - it is just very smart
editor. What i
On 22-Dec-98 Kirk Hutchinson wrote:
> First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it.
True Emacs (XEmacs) was not necessarily designed to be an IDE, though it can
be used as one... which means that it is and IDE (and a whole lot more). Some
people can handle using Emacs as a
On Mon, Dec 21, 1998 at 10:06:10PM -0500, Kirk Hutchinson wrote:
> First of all, XEmacs is not an IDE. It's a code editor - that's it.
You obviously know little about it then. It has built-in and (virtually)
seamless interfaces to compilers, debuggers, and interpreters.
> It's really too bad
i wrote:
>
> Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
>
> Use Emacs and JDE, it's best in the long run.
--
Kirk Hutchinson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Electrical & Software Engineer, Cabletron Systems
What good is unused science?
Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
>
> Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
Use Emacs and JDE, it's best in the long run.
> I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
> is'nt the { and }. How I can re
I use Xemacs for a Java IDE.
S.u.S.e. has the Java Workshop 2.0
for $109 US.
Can't help with the keyboard. :(
Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
>
> Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
>
> I'have another problem, I've the italian K
On Mon, 21 Dec 1998, Pierre Bizzotto wrote:
>Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
>
>I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
>is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe ke
. Dezember 1998 10:36
An: linux java
Betreff:An IDE for C and JAVA
Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this proble
Hi, I need an IDE for C and Java, if it's possible for XWINDOWS or KDE.
I'have another problem, I've the italian Keyboard and on my notebook there
is'nt the { and }. How I can resolve this problem changing aothe key?
Thanks. bye and Merry Xmas.
26 matches
Mail list logo
