Antonio Petricca gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Is it possibile to have the latest BlackBox JDK compiled for the ARM
processor.At this moment we are developing on our Zaurus with BlackBox 1.3.1 and
we encoured a lot of problems for GUI applications, on the original Zaurus OS
and al
ng Linux 2.6.15 (Fedora Core 4) with glibc-2.3.5 on a i386
architecture.
I don't know what the problem really is since the "errno" is not
returned (due to differences between glibc-2.1.x and glibc-2.3.x I believe).
But would it be possible to have a release of Blackdown's JD
ide spread of the language and the platform.
I understand that Sun wants to protect its value, trademark and PR
that Java gives them. But no open sourced (and better yet, free)
implementations of JVM/JDK exist, that are fully up to date with
Sun's new additions (Java 5 and upcoming Mustang - Jav
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Any help is greatly appreciated. If you want to help, Karl will send
> you the necessary paperwork.
>
>
> Juergen
>
Ok then, go ahead and send it to me. At least I can look at it.
If my skills would be enough, I'll try to do something with that.
Wiktor Wanda
Wiktor Wandachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it is the high time for JDK-1.4.2 for sparc + Linux.
Yep. The limiting factor is time.
> I work at the Technical University of Lodz, in Computer Science
> department, and I have to support a whole lab of Sun Blade 150
Juergen Kreileder writes:
> Elvis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> > could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
>
> There's no SPARC version of 1.4.2 currently. I&
Thanks Juergen. There are 6 of us in the state of Virginia, US, crossing
our fingers :-)
Cheers,
Elvis
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Elvis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> > coul
05 17:11 schrieb Elvis:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> > could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
> >
> > If not I have to go back to Solari
Elvis wrote:
Hello,
Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
There's no SPARC version of 1.4.2 currently. I'm working on it but I
can't promise to have it out b
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 17:11 schrieb Elvis:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
>
> If not I have to go back to Solaris which I would hate t
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 17:11 schrieb Elvis:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
>
> If not I have to go back to Solaris which I would hate t
Hello,
Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
If not I have to go back to Solaris which I would hate to do :-(*((
-E.
--
To
Is it possibile to have the latest BlackBox JDK compiled for the ARM processor.At this moment we are developing on our Zaurus with BlackBox 1.3.1 and we encoured a lot of problems for GUI applications, on the original Zaurus OS and also on to the OpenZaurus
3.5.4.Thank you!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Blackdown Team,
~Hello, my name is Barry Hawkins. I am a member of the Debian Java
Packaging project[0]. I am contacting you on behalf several members of
the team regarding the packaging for Debian of your PowerPC Linux 1.3.1
JDK and JRE released
Dear all:
Our organization is planning a big project which
is a Linux-Embedded system and will be sold as
products in the market.
It is necessary for us to use Java and we are
interested in choosing Blackdown JDK.
For some reason we have to discuss whether to base
our system on Intel
Hi,
I have been looking for the blackdown diff's for the jdk source tree to
compile SUNS jdk on a sparclinux box.
I have tried to find them on the ftp site but do not seem to be able to
find them as the direction's in blackdown binary distribution suggests.
could someone tell me w
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 08:57:20AM -0500, Amit Kirdatt wrote:
> We have a web application which generates RTFs dynamically (uses jFor). One
> of the RTFs contains the following symbol ? (symbol for section). Now this
> symbol displays correctly if we start our JBoss server from the command
> line,
Nevermind, I found the problem. The cron environment does not have the
LANG=en_US env. var. set. Once I set that in my script everything works like
a charm
Thanks,
Amit
-Original Message-
From: Amit Kirdatt
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JDK 1.4.2
We have a web application which generates RTFs dynamically (uses jFor). One
of the RTFs contains the following symbol § (symbol for section). Now this
symbol displays correctly if we start our JBoss server from the command
line, but when it automatically starts (we have some automated scripts)
star
Hello,
I am trying to get Java running on an AMD Opteron system in 64bit mode,
but one application which uses the www.wimpi.net telnetd makes some
problems. the machine in question is a dual processor system running
gentoo linux and vanilla kernel 2.6.7. I would be glad for any hints and
help t
Sorry, The thread dump soesn't have anything more than this.
Reg
Veda
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:48 PM
To: Veda N Ponnusamy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JDK 1.4.2 hanging on futex
sometimes there is
sometimes there is more information on the deadlock at the bottom of the
thread dump (i think) including what thread was deadlocked with what...
Veda N Ponnusamy wrote:
I'm having problem with SUN jdk 1.4.2. My application deadlocks when its trying to find the file size. When I do a stra
I'm having problem with SUN jdk 1.4.2. My application deadlocks when its trying to
find the file size. When I do a strace -p pid, this is the output I get
futex(0x9e21ff88, FUTEX_WAIT, 0, NULL)
The thread dump shows the following:
"RMI TCP Connection(1206)-10.0.102.3" da
Updated Debian packages for the 1.4 runtime and sdk can be found at
http://cs.tu-berlin.de/~doko/tmp/. I know that Stephen did prepare
some packages, but did never upload them.
Juergen, is there a chance to move them to the blackdown archives?
Thanks, Matthias
--
Hi,
for some reason I need the BD JDK 1.3.1_01 but I cannot find it under
Blackdown.org download area.
Can anyone please tell me where I can download that version?
Thx and regards
Volker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Hari Om <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I downloaded and installed "j2sdk-1.3.1-02b-FCS-linux-ppc.bin" from
> the penguinppc.org web site and followed the instructions. I was
> able to INSTALL under /usr/local and also changed my PATH
> variable.but later when I test my java version it gives
> f
I downloaded and installed "j2sdk-1.3.1-02b-FCS-linux-ppc.bin" from the
penguinppc.org web site and followed the instructions. I was able to INSTALL
under /usr/local and also changed my PATH variable.but later when I test
my java version it gives following error - wonder why
BTW can I get a survey of what your file.encodings and systems are? A quick way to find
out if you have beanshell in your classpath:
echo "System.out.println(System.getProperty(\"file.encoding\"));" | java bsh.Interpreter
The system where I had this problem is a redhat 6.x system. On a rh 8.0 t
I have code to create a Multipart like this:
MimeMultipart mm = new MimeMultipart("alternative");
BodyPart bp = new MimeBodyPart() ;
bp.setText(text);
mm.addBodyPart(bp);
bp = new MimeBodyPart() ; //reset variable for html part
bp.setContent(html
Hi,
Could someone tell me if the Blackdown JDK 1.4.1 beta supports green threads..?
I'm currently playing around with the open mosix cluster stuff and I have a
application that is currently running with the sun 1.4.0 jdk and because this uses
native thread and shared memory none o
Hi all,
I've downloaded jre-1.3.1-FCS-linux-ppc.bin and
j2sdk-1.3.1-FCS-linux-ppc.bin
I 've installed it in jre1.3.1 and j2sdk1.3.1
when I do java or javac or appletviewer I'm geeting same errors-
/**ERRORS I'm getting ***/
[: No such file or directory
[: No such file or dir
Title: Jdk 1.4.1 on arm or xscale
Hi,
There is a plan to port jdk1.4.1 on ARM or Xscale (Linux)?
Yvan
t; I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact.
> > ). Installed it as root under /usr/local.
> >
> > When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was
> > originally created with JDK 1.3.1 ( but recompiled for JDK 1.4.1 ), I get
&
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:07:26AM +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
>
> I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact. ).
> Installed it as root under /usr/local.
>
> When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was
> originall
I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact. ).
Installed it as root under /usr/local.
When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was
originally created with JDK 1.3.1 ( but recompiled for JDK 1.4.1 ), I get
this:
11/08/2002 10:43:10
>
> My apologies if this post provokes fear and loathing, but does
> anybody subscribed to this list know if anybody is working on a
> blackdown 1.4 release on non-Intel platforms (specifically PPC)?
the blackdown release for ppc, if there will be any :) , will not have jit
enabled. But i thin
My apologies if this post provokes fear and loathing, but does
anybody subscribed to this list know if anybody is working on a
blackdown 1.4 release on non-Intel platforms (specifically PPC)?
--
__
Wilhelm Fitzpa
** [plugin-all] Error 1
I noticed that in the mozilla 0.9.9 headers that RegisterComponent is
declared in xpcom/nsComponentManagerObsolete.h now. I also notice
that inclusion of this is wrapped by
#ifndef MOZILLA_STRICT_API
#include "nsComponentManagerUtils.h"
#include &
I saw a post back in June 2001 referring to a JDK release
not yet being available and saying it would take a couple weeks to run the
tests. Has this become available yet?
We are porting a pretty large J2SE application to the StrongArm processor on an iPaq
3800 and have linux, x
exception after about 2
hours. This is strange because my application doesn't keep big objects
in memory. So, I tested the previous version for the Sparc, which seems
to be jdk 1.2.2 RC4 with the hotspot VM. This one runs correctly and I
don't see any increase in the memory footprint d
Hello everyone,
I guess that this was asked before but.. Is there any hope to see
a JDK more recent than 1.3.0 for SparcLinux? I'm specifically looking for
1.3.1 (or mmore recent, I guess).. I am just a java user but I have some
apps which require 1.3.1 and don't run on 1.3.0
Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone else tried an applet with 1.4.0 Java Plug-in (with
> or without java3d) in Netscape on debian?
Yes (mostly with our 1.4.0 code).
Note that there are some problems with Java2 1.4.0 and J3D 1.2.1_03.
Until J3D 1.2.1_04 is ready you might want
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, MD. Tauhidul Islam wrote:
> In Redhat Linux 7.0 after installing jdk and setting the path environment,
> when I try to compile java source file then I get the following error:
>
> # javac test.java
> Segmentation fault: core dumped
>
Visit updates.re
In Redhat Linux 7.0 after installing jdk and setting the path
environment, when I try to compile java source file then I get the
following error:
# javac test.java
Segmentation fault: core dumped
how to resolve this problem
regards
Tauhid
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have been using JDK 1.3.1-b24 with JBuilder4 Foundation Edition before with
> RedHat 6.x ( 2.2..x kernel ,XFree86 4.1.0, glibc 2.1.3, etc. , KDE 2.1 )
>
> Ever since I mov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have been using JDK 1.3.1-b24 with JBuilder4 Foundation Edition before with
RedHat 6.x ( 2.2..x kernel ,XFree86 4.1.0, glibc 2.1.3, etc. , KDE 2.1 )
Ever since I moved to RedHat 7.2 ( RH 2.4.9 kernel, glibc 2.2.4, Xfree86
4.1.0, KDE 2.2 ), when
Nathan,
> There's no obvious reason the JDK should be a pig under
> UML - it's just another native app.
That's my point of view...
> It is a heavy user
> of threads, unlike most Linux apps, so it might be
> worth seeing if other multi-threaded apps show similar
&
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:53:40PM +0100, Thomas Bonk wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I tried to run Jetty (http://jetty.mortbay.org) under the
> Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 in a User Mode Linux VM.
I think yours my be the first ever po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I tried to run Jetty (http://jetty.mortbay.org) under the
Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 in a User Mode Linux VM.
It works fine (i.e. it does what it is supposed to) but: Java
consumes around 25% CPU on the real hardware. When I run Jetty
under the
Vinod Lamba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am planning to upgrade from RHL7.1 to RHL7.2 and our
> appilcations heavily depends on blackdown jdk1.2 and jdk1.3.
>
> Some questions regarding this ::
>
> 1. Is there any problem in using jdk1.2/1.3 which is released for
>RHL7.1 (kernel
Hi,
I am planning to
upgrade from RHL7.1 to RHL7.2 and our appilcations heavily depends on blackdown
jdk1.2 and jdk1.3.
Some questions regarding
this ::
1. Is there any problem in using
jdk1.2/1.3 which is released for RHL7.1 (kernel 2.4.2) with RHL7.2 (kernel
2.4.7) ?
2. Are
Man Chi Ly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was curious which version of Mozilla the Java Plugin in Blackdown
> JDK 1.3.0 is compatible with.
It was written for M18 originally.
> This bug shows the behavior with recent Mozilla builds:
>
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/s
Hi,
I was curious which version of Mozilla the Java Plugin in Blackdown JDK
1.3.0 is compatible with.
This bug shows the behavior with recent Mozilla builds:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107295
Yes, I'm aware Blackdown JDK 1.3.1 Java Plugin works great. Are any
&
the destination plateform is Linux or
alternative... so i think a need JDK 1.3.1 or JRE with JMF 2.1.1 for
Linux.
a XServer... maybe XFree 4.0 R6 ?
how much ram do i need ?
and CPU speed ?
suppose i want to play a movie mpeg1-2 800x600 on a
LCD display.
nel. Many JDK's(esp 1.3.x) were not qualified for this
> linux kernel. Linux kernel has gone many changes especially in Thread
> scheduling algos which need to be qualified by JDK developers. If not you
> might face the same problem what I'm facing.
>
> IBM jdk - 1.3.1 in 2.
Sounds great. Blackdown rocks.
-Jim
> Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Back at the end of August it was said that a first Blackdown release
> > (beta) of JDK 1.4 would happen in two weeks. It's been a bit longer
> > than that. Anyone know what&
All,
Redhat 7.2 comes with the default linux kernel of 2.4.3. Please be
careful with this kernel. Many JDK's(esp 1.3.x) were not qualified for this
linux kernel. Linux kernel has gone many changes especially in Thread
scheduling algos which need to be qualified by JDK developers. If no
Has anyone tried the latest JDKs (Blackdown/Sun/IBM) with RedHat 7.2?
In previous RedHat upgrades I had discovered incompatibilities with
the Java JDKs. In one case I had to downgrade (painful!).
Thanks,
Alexander
--
To UNSUB
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Back at the end of August it was said that a first Blackdown release
> (beta) of JDK 1.4 would happen in two weeks. It's been a bit longer
> than that. Anyone know what's going on? New features (generics,
> etc) being crammed
s
the char* acts as expected!
Why?
Why is there no entry in libInitTest.so?
thanks again for any help,
Marcel
PS: I will send this question to the gcc mailing list as well
probably they know.
>
> Matthias
>
>
> Marcel Ruff wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>i am usi
Hi,
a funktion void _init(void) is called on loading a shared library, if it
exists. See dlopen(3).
Matthias
Marcel Ruff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i am using Linux 2.4.4-4 with JDK 1.3.1
>
> I want to call one method in a native, shared C++ library from
> Java, using JNI.
Hi,
i am using Linux 2.4.4-4 with JDK 1.3.1
I want to call one method in a native, shared C++ library from
Java, using JNI.
The C++ .so lib depends on other .so libs
which have many C++ classes which are
usually initialized automatically on startup before the
main() method (if i invoke
the old
Is a JDK 1.3.x (with HotSpot compiler) currently in works for the S/390 Linux
environment
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4 Sep 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Odd. I have very few problems with Mozilla (I am using 0.9.3), and
> > totally love it. It doesn't crash where Netscape *will* crash! I've
> > only had Mozilla crash when I've forgotten to initialise it by
> > running it as root after installation.
>
>
y had Mozilla crash when I've forgotten to initialise it by
> running it as root after installation.
Mozilla still crashes my X server at startup.
> Thanks, I'll look forward to testing the sparc-linux JDK 1.3.1 when
> it's out. I have a lot of java stuff that's g
tion.
Thanks, I'll look forward to testing the sparc-linux JDK 1.3.1 when it's
out. I have a lot of java stuff that's guaranteed to cause most JVMs a
nasty case of heartburn. ;o) Blackdown 1.3.0 on Sparc and 1.3.0 & 1.3.1 on
Intel works fine!
I am somewhat concerned by the requi
Alex Buell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Jim Hazen wrote:
>
>> I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster
>> (than the Sun version), works better, doesn't crash. Couldn't want
>> much more in a JVM. I'm looking forward to Blackdown's take on
>> 1.4,
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The status page for the Blackdown 1.4 port hasn't been updated in a
> while. Is there any new news? Is Blackdown waiting to integrate
> the Sun 1.4 beta 2 source? Are they prohibited from releasing
> "beta" products by Sun?
>
> I'm currently using Black
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Jim Hazen wrote:
> I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster
> (than the Sun version), works better, doesn't crash. Couldn't want
> much more in a JVM. I'm looking forward to Blackdown's take on 1.4,
> but since their promise on 6/25 that a beta wou
The status page for the Blackdown 1.4 port hasn't been updated in a while. Is
there any new news? Is Blackdown waiting to integrate the Sun 1.4 beta 2
source? Are they prohibited from releasing "beta" products by Sun?
I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster (than the
Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:39:03PM +0800, Sam (Ying-Hsien Ku) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have installed jdk1.2.2 on Mandrake 7.0
>>
>> However,
>> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]# javac
>> Error: can't find libjava.so.
>> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]#
(You might wan
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:39:03PM +0800, Sam (Ying-Hsien Ku) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have installed jdk1.2.2 on Mandrake 7.0
>
> However,
> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]# javac
> Error: can't find libjava.so.
> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]#
>
> I just find the file on /home/sam/jdk1.2.2/jre/lib/i386/libjav
Hi all,
I have installed jdk1.2.2 on Mandrake 7.0
However,
[root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]# javacError: can't find
libjava.so.[root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]#
I just find the file on
/home/sam/jdk1.2.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so.
What should I do?
thank you all~
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your quick response.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Johan Vos wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Marcus Crafter wrote:
>
> > Great work, but I wanted to ask what performance expectations we
> > should have ? Our tests have shown that the Blackdo
I'm using the sun jdk for a j2ee project. I'm interested in switching to the ibm
jdk. They are supposed to be interchangable, no? Can I successfully do this?
What problems would I run into?
Thanks in advance
Kevin
---
>Yes, performance can be increased since:
>1) there is currently no hotspot in sparc jdk 1.3.0
>2) some parts were compiled without optimization in order to bypass a
>compiler problem.
>
>The intention was to go to 1.4 immediately, and to skip improvements on
>1.3.0 or 1.3.1.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Hope all is well.
>
> We've just noticed that the Blackdown JDK 1.3.0 for sparc is available
> and have installed it on our E250 system.
It should be on the mirrors now, indeed.
> Great
Hi All,
Hope all is well.
We've just noticed that the Blackdown JDK 1.3.0 for sparc is available
and have installed it on our E250 system.
Great work, but I wanted to ask what performance expectations we
should have ? Our tests have shown tha
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Alexander Popov wrote:
> So my question is: What parts of the glibc can we
> strip down - what does the Blackdown 1.1.8 VM need
> from the standard glibc?
Try this?
nm -g -D -u /usr/local/java/jdk1.2.2/bin/i386/green_threads/java
--
Joi EllisSoftware E
Hi guys,
We are currently trying to create a small linux
distribution (with as small memory footprint as
possible) to run java apps.
So we've compiled a cut-down kernel and we made a
small VM (I've cut a Blackdown JDK1.1.8 to about
3.5MB - all this will stay on a less than 8MB
flash)...
The main
What is the status of Blackdown's Merlin port? What is the status of other
Blackdown technologies (JMF, JAI, Java3D, etc)?
I know someone asked this same question in late March, and updates to the
Blackdown pages were promised.
I understand that these ports take a tremendous amount of time, and
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Ezra Taylor wrote:
> Hello Liuchao:
> You need to set /etc/profile in order to run (
> javac and java) from anywhere in your
> filesystem.
Change /etc/profile if you want java available by default for all
users of the system.
Otherwise, you should change only the perso
>save this file and reboot your system.
Why would you reboot your system just because you change your shell
configuration file..?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Hello Liuchao:
You need to set /etc/profile in order to run (
javac and java) from anywhere in your
filesystem. In order to accomplish this, go to the directory /etc.
Then look for the file pprofile.
Also, use a text editor such as emacs or vi the edit this file. In thi
e.org/
Walter
Jerry Asher wrote:
>
> Two days ago, I installed JDK 1.3.0_02. Yesterday I installed Tomcat 3.2.1.
>
> I tried JSPs and they failed. I found a Tomcat FAQ that suggested I needed
> to add tools.jar to my CLASSPATH.
>
> So, I added
>
>
i, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:18:59PM -0700, Jerry Asher wrote:
> Two days ago, I installed JDK 1.3.0_02. Yesterday I installed Tomcat 3.2.1.
>
> I tried JSPs and they failed. I found a Tomcat FAQ that suggested I needed
> to add tools.jar to my CLASSPATH.
>
> So, I added
>
> J
Two days ago, I installed JDK 1.3.0_02. Yesterday I installed Tomcat 3.2.1.
I tried JSPs and they failed. I found a Tomcat FAQ that suggested I needed
to add tools.jar to my CLASSPATH.
So, I added
JAVA_HOME/lib/tools.jar
But that didn't work.
Investigation on my machine shows
>>>>> "Jesus" == Jesus M Salvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jesus> I have just read an article on JavaWorld about Merlin and
Jesus> that a beta of JDK 1.4 is to be released this month. Does
Jesus> Blackdown have plans to have their own JDK 1.4
I have just read an article on JavaWorld about Merlin and that a beta of
JDK 1.4 is to be released this month.
Does Blackdown have plans to have their own JDK 1.4 port to Linux
i386/sparc/ppc/etc?
There is nothing indicating this on the ports page:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/ports.html
Sanjay Bhatia wrote:
> Hi,
> I've read every doc I could find and cannot solve a particular problem I am
> having with running an example on my linux machine. Details are :
>
> My CLASSPATH environment variable is set as follows :
>
> /usr/local/xerces/xerces.jar:/usr/local/xerces/xerces
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Sanjay Bhatia wrote:
> Hi,
> I've read every doc I could find and cannot solve a particular problem I am
> having with running an example on my linux machine. Details are :
>
> My CLASSPATH environment variable is set as follows :
>
> /usr/local/xerces/xerces.jar:/u
Hi,
I've read every doc I could find and cannot solve a particular problem I am
having with running an example on my linux machine. Details are :
My CLASSPATH environment variable is set as follows :
/usr/local/xerces/xerces.jar:/usr/local/xerces/xercesSamples.java:
Both the files ex
Which is more reliable and if Javasoft's
is what are the implications for the
Blackdown project?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Yasuhiro Kaizu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed the Red Hat Linux 7.0 and jdk1.2.2. But jave
> won't run and the error message appears on this new OS. I have been running
> jdk1.2.2 on the Red Hat Linux 6.0 for several months and I have never had
> such a kind of
> "Yasuhiro" == Yasuhiro Kaizu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yasuhiro> I have recently installed the Red Hat Linux 7.0 and
Yasuhiro> jdk1.2.2. But jave won't run and the error message
Yasuhiro> appears on this new OS. I have been running jdk1.2.2 on
Yasuhiro> the Red Hat Linux
Hi,
I have recently installed the Red Hat Linux 7.0 and jdk1.2.2. But jave
won't run and the error message appears on this new OS. I have been running
jdk1.2.2 on the Red Hat Linux 6.0 for several months and I have never had
such a kind of trouble. Does anyone know why java runs on the version
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Vladimir G Ivanovic wrote:
> Joi,
>
> I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding this incident,
> but could there be another explanation for your post being missing? For
> instance, a crash followed by a backup could conceivably look like
> someone deleted you
Joi,
I don't know anything about the circumstances surrounding this incident,
but could there be another explanation for your post being missing? For
instance, a crash followed by a backup could conceivably look like
someone deleted your posting. Just asking.
---Vladimir
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Mo DeJong wrote:
> Go to the news server:
>
> news.software.ibm.com
>
> The newsgroup is:
>
> ibm.software.java.linux
After you post, go back a day or so later and see if your post is
still there.
I went there about 6 months ago to report a big problem using the
debugger
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, noisebrain wrote:
> Hello,
>
> does anyone know an email address at ibm that would be interested
> seeing bug reports in their jdk? I have one that happens in theirs
> but not in blackdown or sun.
No email address that I could find, but the "Reporting
1 - 100 of 1435 matches
Mail list logo
