Hello,
I have some kind of file system permissions problem.
I installed the native threads jdk-1.1.7 on my Red Hat machine
(6.0, 6.2??). When I run javac, I get a complaint about
inability to create a file in /proc. The permissions on
/proc look OK. Any help?
Bill Halchin
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
> There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
> got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
> error messa
The package name changed to javax.swing. That's also the case with
reasonably recent releases of Swing1.1 for JDK1.1.
Nathan
On Tue, Nov 16, 1999 at 04:33:36PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
> There is no proble
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:33:36 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi:
>
>I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
>There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
>got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
>err
Hi:
I installed BlackDown jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz on RedHat 6.1 Linux.
There is no problem to compile a simple java application (hello.java). But
got compile error when compile an application with Swing component. The
error message is "Package com.sun.java.swing.* not found in import". W
I've downloaded for installation on
an i386 machine running Red Hat Linux 6.0.
The readme says "All Java-Linux ports share a common set of source
patches. These are located in the 'common' directory for each major
JDK revision." For the revision I've downloaded, that would be the
file . Do I
Hello,
When I attempt to invoke java I get the following error:
./../bin/alpha_21164a/green_threads/java: error in loading shared
libraries: ./../lib/alpha_21164a/green_threads/libjava_dl.so: undefined
symbol: _dl_default_scope
I am running an alpha Linux system using RedHat 6.0.
Has anybody ru
> -Original Message-
> From: Dimitris Terzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 August 1999 14:53
> To: 'Java-Linux mailing list'
> Subject: RE: Problems installing JDK 1.1.7 and JDK 1.2 pre-v2
[snip]
> What happened is that, to download the tar fi
Actually, I believe the problem is related to the fact the NT doesn't support
symbolic links. Almost all the files in the ($JAVA_HOME)/bin directory are
symbolic links to .java_wrapper. The only two files that aren't symbolic links
are .java_wrapper and java-rmi.cgi (atleast on 1.2).
On Mon, 2
>From: "Dimitris Terzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:53:03 +0100
>Hi guys...
>
>I have finally managed to install JDK1.1.7_v1a and JDK1.2... You won't
>What happened is that, to download the tar files, I used an NT machine,
>linked to my Linux PC via Samba. So far so good. Bu
> +I know have a silly problem with JDK 1.1.7. Namely, while I can compile
my
> +application (containing several .java files organised in a number of
> +packages), when I attempt to run it, it doensn't run! My environment is
> + $JAVA_HOME =
> + $CLASSPATH = .:$JAVA_
Hello again...
I think I 've solved most of the silly problems I was experiencing, thanks
for your help and advises...
The only one remaining is a NullPointerException I 'm getting when launching
my application from JDK 1.1.7. It has to do with the initial JFrame. The
interpreter res
+I know have a silly problem with JDK 1.1.7. Namely, while I can compile my
+application (containing several .java files organised in a number of
+packages), when I attempt to run it, it doensn't run! My environment is
+ $JAVA_HOME =
+ $CLASSPATH = .:$JAVA_HOME/lib/classe
checkVersions, and jre for JDK1.1.7 and only the first two of these for JDK
1.2)!!! Weird! So far I have un-tared several archives with WinZip, without
any problems. Is there any shell script automatically running after
un-taring with tar, which (reasonably) WinZip cannot execute?
I know have a s
Dimitris Terzis wrote:
>
> Nathan,
>
> > > I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
> > > bin/x86/native_threads directory each time (by the way, examining the
> > > scripts I see references to sun.tools.* classes - are they included in
> the
> > > libraries?).
> >
>
> Dimitris Terzis writes:
Dimitris> I am aware of this trickery, except that my
Dimitris> /bin subdirectory does not contain
Dimitris> any of the scripts(!). They 're all under
Dimitris> /bin/x86/.../native_threads. And
Dimitris> they don't do anything when I run them!
> Nathan Meyers writes:
Nathan> Don't try to run from those directories. The launch
Nathan> scripts do a lot of important setup. You need to invoke
Nathan> the scripts (java, javac, etc.) found in the
Nathan> /bin subdirectory - you shouldn't be
Nathan> in that directory
Nathan,
> > I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
> > bin/x86/native_threads directory each time (by the way, examining the
> > scripts I see references to sun.tools.* classes - are they included in
the
> > libraries?).
>
> Don't try to run from those directories.
Dimitris Terzis wrote:
>
> Hi guys...
>
> I am getting all sorts of problems with JDK 1.1.7 and JKD 1.2 installation
> in Linux (I have a Pentium II/300 system with RedHat 5.2 and libc-2.0.7.so).
> I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
> b
Hi guys...
I am getting all sorts of problems with JDK 1.1.7 and JKD 1.2 installation
in Linux (I have a Pentium II/300 system with RedHat 5.2 and libc-2.0.7.so).
I try to run the programs (either in binary or script form) from the
bin/x86/native_threads directory each time (by the way
Ratkai Peter wrote:
> HI there,
>
> I have downloaded and instaled JDK 1.1.7, Version 1a. After setting the
> PATH variable, and issuing the command `java` it segfaults.
> I'm not a java guru, especially this is the first time installing java on
> linux. I have a glibc sys
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:02:29 +0200 (CEST), Ratkai Peter wrote:
>HI there,
>
>I have downloaded and instaled JDK 1.1.7, Version 1a. After setting the
>PATH variable, and issuing the command `java` it segfaults.
>I'm not a java guru, especially this is the first time installi
HI there,
I have downloaded and instaled JDK 1.1.7, Version 1a. After setting the
PATH variable, and issuing the command `java` it segfaults.
I'm not a java guru, especially this is the first time installing java on
linux. I have a glibc system, and also have libc-5 librarys installed.
(D
");
System.out.println(z2.doubleValue());
System.out.println(zero);
System.out.println(z2.equals(new Double(zero)));
}
}
(On a Sun system with JDK 1.1.6)
% java Zero
zero=-0.0 myarray=-0.0 0.0 0.0
-0.0
-0.0
true
(On a Linux box with JDK 1.1.7 v1a)
% java Zero
zero=-0.0 myarr
Just to inform that Enhydra 2.0.2 runs OK on my linux machine, Redhat 5.2,
jdk1.1.7 v1a and tya 1.2v4. I don't know which version of lib that I have though
as I haven't upgraded to anything else. I just installed the stuff on top of my
5.2 installation.
hamdi
Stephan Greene wrote:
> I'm trying
On Thu, 6 May 1999 15:28:16 -0400 (EDT), Stephan Greene wrote:
>
>I'm trying to install and try out an XML app server called Enhydra
>( http://www.www.enhydra.org ); it requires a JDK be installed.
>
>With jdk117_v1a installed, I get the following error wjen I try to start
>it:
>
>> B./run_demos
I'm trying to install and try out an XML app server called Enhydra
( http://www.www.enhydra.org ); it requires a JDK be installed.
With jdk117_v1a installed, I get the following error wjen I try to start
it:
> B./run_demos
/usr/local/jdk117_v1a/bin/../bin/i486/green_threads/java: error in loadi
Is the JDK 1.1.7 port compatible with Caldera's OpenLinux 2.2 (2.2 kernel?)
I am interested in getting this distribution, primarily for the KDE desktop,
but I need to know if the JDK will work first.
Thanks in advance,
Peter An
This may be a swing bug... I seem to remember something about latter versions
of swing not working with 11x, but working with 12 in similar situations...
something about a change (bug fix) in the event model for 11x that early swing
was expecting to be broken, and newer swing is expecting to be fi
Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> java.sun.com and then go to (on the left panel) Java Foundation
> Classes, all of them should be in there. Get 1.1 final or 1.1.1beta, I
> don't know how stable the beta is though.
I got also JFC 1.1 and 1.1.1 beta 2 (from java.developer.com) and both
of them don't work wi
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
>
> I am using a jdk 1.1.7-v1a version on a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
>
> I am using also a swingall.jar version (I don't know how to find the
> SWING version) that has 2196234 bytes long.
>
> Using an AWT TextField I can use the numeric keypa
Hello,
I am using a jdk 1.1.7-v1a version on a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
I am using also a swingall.jar version (I don't know how to find the
SWING version) that has 2196234 bytes long.
Using an AWT TextField I can use the numeric keypad to enter digits.
Using a SWING JTextField the numeric k
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
>
> sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("-MM-dd");
> sdf.setLenient(false);
> try {
> thedate = sdf.parse(s);
Hi,
I've gotten good results by using the SimpleDateFormat constructor with this signatur
re in
- in some timezones it works, in others it doesn't.
The problems are fixed in JDK 1.2
regards
[ bryce ]
Constantin Teodorescu wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk 1.1.7-v1a-glibc
> I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350
> "Constantin" == Constantin Teodorescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Constantin> Hello all, I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk
Constantin> 1.1.7-v1a-glibc I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
Constantin> with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350 MHz/64 Mb RAM
The program works fine here.
Hello all,
I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk 1.1.7-v1a-glibc
I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350
MHz/64 Mb RAM
I am setting a new SimpleDateFormat with "-MM-dd" parsing format and
I'm trying to parse and use some dates.
Curiously, the
>I'm about to switch kernels, primarily because the jni isn't working
>properly with my current configuration (I'm currently still using a
>libc5 kernel). Which kernel is most likely to work well with JDK
>1.1.7, particularly with the jni?
>
>Also, might native
. Which kernel is most likely to work well with JDK
1.1.7, particularly with the jni?
Also, might native threads help the jni?
Thanks,
Barnet Wagman
Have you taken a look at your /etc/nsswitch.conf file? Do you have any "nis"
entries? If so, get rid of them and leave things to files and dns. Depending on
what software is running you may be experiencing nis timeouts (because you
aren't running nis) under 2.2.
Dirk Leas wrote:
> Anybody else b
Anybody else benchmarked this combination against the same with the 2.0.36
kernel? It's more than a magnitude slower! One note, I built everything from
source except for the JDK which I'm running from the tar content.
Under 2.0.36, the above combination runs faster than IIS 4.0 + ServletExec
2.x!
I am puzzled by the interaction between non java object allocated in
the heap and the java GC. Where can I find the source files for the
native thread implementation of the JDK 1.1.7 v1a?
Cheers,
-- Georges
--
To
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:37:00 -0500, Bruce R Miller wrote:
>Hi all;
> Would the problem with jdk 1.1.7 and glibc-2.0.1xx be solved simply by
>re-make-ing the system? This has solved some other similar problems for me.
>(or does extensive, painful, testing have to be done?)
Well, th
Hi all;
Would the problem with jdk 1.1.7 and glibc-2.0.1xx be solved simply by
re-make-ing the system? This has solved some other similar problems for me.
(or does extensive, painful, testing have to be done?)
If it's simple -- and assuming jdk 1.2 isn't right around the corner -- w
Hi!
Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did native threads ever achieve production quality in Linux JDK 1.1?
> I never had much luck with them on Linux 2.0... tended to dump core
> on me.
In kernels 2.2.0pre <= 7 I had no problems: I had run jpython (like a
shell) + together + netbeans i
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Michael Sinz wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:24:40 -0500, Warren Johnson wrote:
>
> >I have a web page that can be accessed with a browser (IE4 and Netscape)
> >called Build the Snowman. On the left frame is the beginning template of
> >the snowman on the right frame is stu
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 11:24:40 -0500, Warren Johnson wrote:
>I have a web page that can be accessed with a browser (IE4 and Netscape)
>called Build the Snowman. On the left frame is the beginning template of
>the snowman on the right frame is stuff like clothes, hats, etc... On the
>bottom you hit
Hi,
It seems that you are using getImage to transfer the image back and
forth.
Is there any particular reason to use the toolkit to fetch the image
for processing?
You can perfectly fetch the image using a stream and then use a PixelGrabber
to reconstruct the image in memory (and process it).
The
Netscape Enterprise Server. Moved it to a Redhat 5.2 machine with
> more memory and disk space with the latest Apache Web Server and this is JDK
> 1.1.7. When I create the picture via my browser, the Apache error log shows
> the following:
>
> _X11TransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't
Ok, same questions:
>My kneejerk response is to ask if X is running on the server and
>to ask if your DISPLAY environment variable is set properly for user "nobody"
or
>whoever your using for the web user. eg. "host.mynet.com:0.0"
If you'd like to send me the url for page (or is it an intranet) a
PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Jdk 1.1.7 and X-Server
>
>
> I need a little more info. I understand that this is an
> application that is
> called as a CGI by Apache? Is it then supposed to display something on the
> server's X display while it works? (This seems like a tall o
I need a little more info. I understand that this is an application that is
called as a CGI by Apache? Is it then supposed to display something on the
server's X display while it works? (This seems like a tall order with possibly
several hundred users on the web side but it may make sense for your
JDK
1.1.7. When I create the picture via my browser, the Apache error log shows
the following:
_X11TransSocketUNIXConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111
java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as
the value of the DISPLAY variable.
at su
Did native threads ever achieve production quality in Linux JDK 1.1? I never had
much luck with them on Linux 2.0... tended to dump core on me.
> Argh!!
>
> with java -native ANYCLASSFILE, I had:
>
> **
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
> stackbase=BF9FFE70, stackpoin
Argh!!
with java -native ANYCLASSFILE, I had:
**
SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
stackbase=BF9FFE70, stackpointer=BF9FF9E0
Full thread dump:
"TimerQueue" (TID:0x406788d8, sys_thread_t:0x846d858, state:CW, thread_t: t@7175,
sp:0x2f4f4f threadID:0x1947, stack_base:
Well, it looks like my problem is with lesstif. I turned on
"DYN_JAVA=true", and re-ran, and found that the pre-build JDK also
crapped out with a SEGV.
And green_threads worked.
So it looks like the common thread is that if I'm using lesstif, I
can't use native_threads -- it croaks big time.
I got the prebuilt AWT binaries for jdk117v1a, both native-threads and
green-threads versions, and they work just fine on my Linux Debian 2.0
box.
I then rebuilt, using the combination of
jdk-1.1.7-v1a.diffs.gz
JDK1_1_7K.solwin32.31_Aug_98.zip
lesstif 0.83
libc6 2.0.7t
and found that both
I have been reporting problems with JNI/Invocation
with JDK 1.1.7v1a+native for apps that use libdl.so,
a bug which has been confirmed by Blackdown.
By accident I discovered a quick patch on this problem
that seems to work fine on my Debian "slink" snapshot,
so if you happen to be stuck with a
I had some problems while trying to install JDK(main being, I couldn't
figure out how to install it!). Could you help me somehow?
Hi,
I'm probably asking a dumb question, but hope springs eternal...I'm sort of
hoping the README isn't up to date...
Can Java Activator run on JDK 1.1.7+TYA? (or even without TYA). I don't relish
having to have two distinct JDK versions on the same machine, what with a
Group : Development/Languages/JavaSource RPM:
jdk-1.1.7-1a.glibc.src.rpm
Size: 55560136 License: see README.linux
Packager: Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.javasoft.com/products/jdk/
Summary : Java Developer's Kit
De
Your Blackdown Java-Linux porting group would like to announce that
the JDK 1.1.7 should now be available. The big surprise is that we
now have a native threads add-on package for it too. (Thanks to Phill)
Make sure you read the README.native_threads for some details as to
what to expect. (It
Announcing: JDK 1.1.7 for MkLinux, Linux-PMac, and LinuxPPC
New in this Port
* This is our v1 port of Sun's JDK 1.1.7 final.
- includes numerous bug fixes direct from Sun
- fix for kernel accept() bug, caused slow Java Web Server
- turn-off by: e
by the way,
in iomgr.c you may have to tell it to open something...
"sbb: you need to open libc by hand -- good luck -- most of the
+ * "
jw
Filipe Custsdio wrote:
> I spent this weekend trying to get JDK 1.1.7 to compile. After patching
> the sources with the JDK1.1.6v5 diffs, I applied the diffs that "patch"
> rejected manually.
I did the same using slackware libc5, it works ok, but i only applied the
rejects wh
I spent this weekend trying to get JDK 1.1.7 to compile. After patching
the sources with the JDK1.1.6v5 diffs, I applied the diffs that "patch"
rejected manually.
I finally have a compilable JDK 1.1.7. Unfortunately, it segfaults on
trying to run anything. I'll try to track down
I have got the JDK 1.1.7 to build using the 1.1.6v4a diffs, and can run simple
programs without the awt. I understand there is not a lot of point to this and i
am more than happy to wait for the porting team to work their magic, but it has
certainly been a very useful learning exercise for
-Mensaje original-
De: Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: miércoles 7 de octubre de 1998 14:11
Asunto: JDK 1.1.7 source released yet?
>Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
>yet? Sun ke
Michael Thome wrote:
>
> Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
> yet? Sun keeps pointing me at files on their server that don't exist.
I downloaded mine this morning.
I managed it
--
> Da: Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: JDK 1.1.7 source released yet?
> Data: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 1:01 PM
>
> Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
> yet? Sun keeps po
Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
yet? Sun keeps pointing me at files on their server that don't exist.
thanks,
-mik
--
Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
70 matches
Mail list logo
