Re: Mailing list changes

2002-07-04 Thread Geoff Beaumont
On Wed, 2002-07-03 at 18:09, Karl Asha wrote: > Due to spam complaints from my provider that originated from this mailing list, I >have enabled the restriction that posting to this list requires you to be subscribed >to the list. What this means to you is that if the email address you subscribed

Mailing list changes

2002-07-03 Thread Karl Asha
Due to spam complaints from my provider that originated from this mailing list, I have enabled the restriction that posting to this list requires you to be subscribed to the list. What this means to you is that if the email address you subscribed with does not match the email address you post

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-14 Thread chang hun Park
$)C mail :83;Av 86< REMOVE > > Carlo E. Prelz @[<:GT: > > > Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes > > Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 > > > > Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > Now

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-13 Thread Richard Jones
Alex Chaffee wrote: > Slightly off-topic: > > Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone > written a free, stable two-way bridge between email and nntp? I'd love to > keep subscribing to the list digest, but be able to use a news reader to > browse the archives... It

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-13 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Alex Chaffee wrote: > > > Newsgroups have a different audience and accessing method. I, for one, > > > would probably stop following this list if it became a newsgroup. > > Slightly off-topic: > > Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone > writ

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread SHUDO Kazuyuki
> > or move it to a place willing to host the java-linux and java-linux-digest > > lists. The world unfortunately isn't a place of free bandwidth forever > > and I have to make some decisions. > > java-linux is not a high-bandwidth mailing-list. > > I suggest looking at your configuration. I sugg

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Robert McConnell
Alex, There are several, both commercial and open source. At least two of the newsgroups I follow are gatewayed from mailing lists. It shouldn't take too long at dejanews to find the software involved and possibly find a friendly gateway server. Bob McConnell N2SPP At 01:25 PM 1/12/99 -0500, Al

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Alex Chaffee
> > Newsgroups have a different audience and accessing method. I, for one, > > would probably stop following this list if it became a newsgroup. Slightly off-topic: Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone written a free, stable two-way bridge between email and nntp

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]:Mailing List Changes)

1999-01-12 Thread Martin Little
Armen Yampolsky wrote: > > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > > > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > > it. > > I agree absolutely. Slashdot? Reading the

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes)

1999-01-12 Thread Armen Yampolsky
> Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. I agree absolutely. Slashdot? Reading the posts are a nightmare! It is a classi

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Richard Jones
blaise toad wrote: > > Like paul proposes, I honestly believe web based threaded discussion > are the best (a la slashdot). You obviously have free phone bills or something (unlike in the UK where you suck the 'net through a very narrow straw at very high cost). You can go to a web discussion if

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Matt Zagni
Is it fairly easy st set up a mailing list then ? How does one do it in linux - for general use ? Matt > Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:00:55 -0500 > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:10:45 +0800 (WST) > From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I'd like to do one of two things with this

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Karl Asha wrote: > > I'd like to do one of two things with this mailing list, as it's really > become a significant amount of traffic. Either move it to a newsgroup, Too open to spamming (we get too much now) and email-address harvesting. > or move it to a place willing

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Dimitris Vyzovitis
Robert McConnell wrote: > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. > I agree too. We don't need to be proactive in order t

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread David Warnock
> > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > > it. > > I agree. Mailing-list and newsgroup style discussions have much mo

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Pete Hardie
Robert McConnell wrote: > > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. I agree. Mailing-list and newsgroup style discussion

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Robert McConnell
Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with it. Bob McConnell N2SPP At 07:06 PM 1/11/99 -0800, blaise toad wrote: >Like paul proposes,

Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread blaise toad
Like paul proposes, I honestly believe web based threaded discussion are the best (a la slashdot). Newsgroup has ... nahh!! yeah I guess that would be cool. blaise (BTW thanks for many years of support to the bd folks) _ DO YOU YAHOO!

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread chang hun Park
$)C REMOVE Carlo E. Prelz @[<:GT: > Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes > Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 > > Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a &g

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Kontorotsui
On 10-Jan-99 Karl Asha wrote: > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > newsgroup proposed and possibly approved. Alternatively, I would really > appreciate a -stable- (and by stable I mean someplace that isn't going to > die within a week) to host the mailing li

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Cees de Groot
Option three would be to ask someone to explode the list for you. I'm running a setup at home with my ISP set as smarthost in my sendmail config, and that really cuts down on processing time, bandwidth, etcetera. Advantages: you get to keep the control over administration, and the one sponsoring

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread paul . wheaton
cc: Paul Wheaton/Jeppesen/TMC) Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes I'd like to do one of two things with this mailing list, as it's really become a significant amount of traffic. Either move it to a newsgroup, or move it to a place willing to host the java-linux and java-lin

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:40:13 +0200 From: "Carlo E. Prelz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I guess vger is the right place to relocate the list. There seems to be an e-mail address to contact people there: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At least while the 2.2.0-pre* hoopla is going on I have to

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Carlo E. Prelz
Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > newsgroup proposed and possibly approved. Alternatively, I would

[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-10 Thread Karl Asha
I'd like to do one of two things with this mailing list, as it's really become a significant amount of traffic. Either move it to a newsgroup, or move it to a place willing to host the java-linux and java-linux-digest lists. The world unfortunately isn't a place of free bandwidth forever and I h