They've filed it as bug #16813.
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Trung Duc Tran wrote:
>
>>> [snip]
>>> In short if the user runs the IDE on jdk 1.2 or 1.3 we activate the old
>>> NbFocusManager, otherwise (it means the user is using jdk 1.4 or later)
>>> we use the new cod
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> java.vm.version starts with 1.3 on Sun's and IBM's VMs but our VM has
> "Blackdown-1.3.1-FCS". So jdk12or13 is false on our VM and NetBeans
> tries to load a class which is new in J2SE v1.4.
>
> I think the test is broken, it sh
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:30:44PM +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> jdk12or13 is defined as:
>
> ,[ NbFocusManager.java ]
> | private static boolean jdk12or13 =
> | System.getProperty ("java.vm.version").startsWith ("1.2") // NOI18N
> | || System.getProperty ("java.vm.version
Glenn Holmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Starting the 10/12 Q-Build of NetBeans 3.3 (first beta is next week)
> under Blackdown 1.3.0 or 1.3.1 JVM throws, and the main window never
> opens. The Sun and IBM JVMs work fine. Any ideas?
> > Sat Oct
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 10:35:11AM -0500, Glenn Holmer wrote:
> Starting the 10/12 Q-Build of NetBeans 3.3 (first beta is next week)
> under Blackdown 1.3.0 or 1.3.1 JVM throws, and the main window never
> opens. The Sun and IBM JVMs work fine. Any ideas? You can get the
> binary
Starting the 10/12 Q-Build of NetBeans 3.3 (first beta is next week) under Blackdown
1.3.0 or 1.3.1 JVM throws, and the main window never opens. The Sun and IBM JVMs
work fine. Any ideas? You can get the binary at this site:
http://www.netbeans.org/downloads.html
> Sat Oct 20 10:22:53
I have recently upgraded to Netbeans 3.2.1 and have noticed something
while scanning the log. It appears that Netbeans looks for classes
inside of the your jdk/jre/ directory structure, is this a throw back to
java 1.1(ugh) and can be ignored or is this some sort of error
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2000 4:14 PM
Subject: Netbeans debugger not working with JDK1.3
> Hi everybody,
>
>
> I guess it is known that the Blackdown JDK 1.3 does not work reliably with
> the Forte/Netbeans debugger, the JVM crashes hard after a few seconds
Hi everybody,
I guess it is known that the Blackdown JDK 1.3 does not work reliably with
the Forte/Netbeans debugger, the JVM crashes hard after a few seconds of
step-debugging. I would switch to the IBM JDK, but I can't debug JMF
applications with it (it cannot find the codecs, and the R
At 01:13 PM 8/30/99 +, you wrote:
Hi. The broken mailing-list software that this mailing list uses, will
accept subscriptions without requiring confirmations. This means that when
a spammer revenge-subscribes me to thousands of mailing lists, your broken
mailing-list software aids and abets
Jan Agermose
Matthew Jason Brown wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I would like to try out Netbeans Gandalf Public Beta that was just
> released. I do have 2.1 on my machine and I have tried the Gandalf port
> using Win98(it was resonably fast and stable) but I noticed after
> downloading it,
Hello,
I would like to try out Netbeans Gandalf Public Beta that was just
released. I do have 2.1 on my machine and I have tried the Gandalf port
using Win98(it was resonably fast and stable) but I noticed after
downloading it, it cannot fiqure out that i have jdk1.2(which is
required) and I
On 15-May-99 Robert Williams wrote:
> What changes did you make? Simplicity + JDK1.2 freezes up
> after a few steps through the tutorial example 1 on my Red Hat 5.2 system.
No changes at all. I have a SuSE 6.1, I installed JDK1.2 and the only change I
did was to edit the Simplicity script to m
What changes did you make? Simplicity + JDK1.2 freezes up
after a few steps through the tutorial example 1 on my Red Hat 5.2 system.
Kontorotsui wrote:
> On 13-May-99 Jeffery S. Norman wrote:
> > Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> > SimplicityRC???
On 13-May-99 Jeffery S. Norman wrote:
> Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> SimplicityRC???
Simplicity does work on my system with JDK1.2, I had to change the wrapper
Simplicity script, but works.
---
Andrea "Kontorotsui" Controzzi - MALE Student of
> Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> SimplicityRC???
>
> NetBeans installs properly (SuSE 6.0) and displays the splash screen,
> but then crashes with a SIGSEGV 11.
>
> Thanks for any help.
Hi Jeffery,
In general, version 1.1 of Simplicity for
I have JDK1.2 for WinNT (work) and Blackdown's port (Linux) working
with NetBeans on both machines. I also have Simplicity working on
both machines. Although Simplicity (at least my version) is just a demo
and won't let you save files.
NetBeans installed right from the downlo
Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
SimplicityRC???
NetBeans installs properly (SuSE 6.0) and displays the splash screen,
but then crashes with a SIGSEGV 11.
Thanks for any help.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Nobby Knox wrote:
> My problem is that I cannot get the Netbeans application installed.
> Netbeans is a very good Java IDE (in my opinion) and is written entirely
> in Java. Also, this is not the only application that will not run on my
> Redhat 5.2 system (JDK 1.
am also new to Java and
> Linux.
>
> My problem is that I cannot get the Netbeans application installed.
> Netbeans is a very good Java IDE (in my opinion) and is written entirely
> in Java. Also, this is not the only application that will not run on my
> Redhat 5.2 system (JDK 1
Hello everyone.
This is my first post to this email list. I am also new to Java and
Linux.
My problem is that I cannot get the Netbeans application installed.
Netbeans is a very good Java IDE (in my opinion) and is written entirely
in Java. Also, this is not the only application that will not
I downloaded Netbeans and have tried it on my NT 4 (P133, 64MB) and it is very slow. I
actually wanted to find an IDE that would work on multiple platforms to develop
servlets, since I'm concerned with the poor performance of more client side Java. This
is proof positive for me. I lik
Hi,
I'm using Netbeans IDE 2.0 with my Pentium 200 and it's very very slow.
Now I want to speed up it, with a just-in-time-compiler.
So, I tried TYA, which is very unofficial, but it didn't work with
Netbeans.
So, my question is: Do you know any JIT-Compilers for Linux, which are
Download is damn slow.
Andrew
Original Message
Subject: Final Release of NetBeans Developer 2.0 available now
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 14:30:48 -0600
From: NetBeans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear NetBeans user,
It's available ! The much antici
Hello! I have been out of Java for the past year and a half.
At that time, JDBC in Applets was just too immature to be used (my opinion
of course).
Now, I'm trying to see what is out there now. I am starting to
play with NetBeans and I am curious about the best way to use JDBC.
Is i
Hi, Syed,
To paraphrase Jerry McGuire:
"Show us the CLASSPATH."
Best Regards,
KR
Syed Mubin wrote:
> ...
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Netbeans nbdv20b3.sh on JDK1.1.6 but
> not sucessful.I also have installed SWING1.0.3 the SwingSet example is
>
TIFR Centre, P.B #1234,
> 80-334-5615 or 4062 or 3035 IISc Campus,
> Resi :3452848Bangalore - 560 012. INDIA.
> ___
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to install Netb
Bangalore - 560 012. INDIA.
___
Hi,
I'm trying to install Netbeans nbdv20b3.sh on JDK1.1.6 but
not sucessful.I also have installed SWING1.0.3 the SwingSet example is
working fine but when i
Matt Zagni wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone installed the new version of netbeans yet ?
Well, it still crashes at random times.
I can say that it is still really UNSTABLE.
However, I didn't have any problems with the install
am running
Slackware 3.5 and jdk1.1.6v4a libc5 version with no modifications to the libs
and no problems here.
K.R.
>
>
> Many thanks
>
> Matt
>
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 18 16:33:59 1998
> >
> > Matt Zagni wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Has anyone installed the new version of netbeans yet ?
> >
> > I am using jdk1.1.6v4a but the netbeans install is looking
> > for java.exe in /usr/local/jdk1.1.6v4a/bin/bin/i586/green_threads/java
> >
> > I thought java would be in
> > /usr/local
Matt Zagni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone installed the new version of netbeans yet ?
>
> I am using jdk1.1.6v4a but the netbeans install is looking
> for java.exe in /usr/local/jdk1.1.6v4a/bin/bin/i586/green_threads/java
>
> I thought java would be in
> /usr
Hi,
Who is this [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Why am I getting muti email messages ?
Is there sometime wrong with the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list ?
Many thanks
Matt
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 18 10:49:44 1998
>
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone installed the new version of netbeans
stall and all went fine.
Any constructive tips on netbeans are welcome.
Many thanks
Matt
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 18 10:31:19 1998
>
> Where can I get net beans ?
>
> Incidentally, it looks to me like the PATH is wrong. Note the two 'bin's.
> Maybe you sho
Hi,
Has anyone installed the new version of netbeans yet ?
I am using jdk1.1.6v4a but the netbeans install is looking
for java.exe in /usr/local/jdk1.1.6v4a/bin/bin/i586/green_threads/java
I thought java would be in
/usr/local/jdk1.1.6v4a/bin/i586/green_threads/java
Have I managed to messup
Press Release: Technology Writers & Business Editors
Prague, Czech Republic, September 14, 1998 - NetBeans, Inc. today announced
the release of the Beta 3 version of NetBeans Developer 2.0. It is the last
beta prior to the full release, which is due near the beginning of Q4. Beta
Press Release: Technology Writers & Business Editors
Prague, Czech Republic, September 14, 1998 - NetBeans, Inc. today announced the
release of the Beta 3 version of NetBeans Developer 2.0. It is the last beta
prior to the full release, which is due near the beginning of Q4. Beta
>> :( That means the "problem" won't be fixed, not by Netbeans anyway. I guess
>> the chances of me buying it are rather slim then...
>
> Then I should leave my hopes for a serious IDE in freebuilder (it is also
> unstable, but it is not called beta2, but rele
haves better (sometimes ;-} ) in this way, but I should call it at
least UNSTABLE. Seriously, it doesn't behave like a beta version, but like an
early preview release (at least in Linux).
>
> > I wouldn't like to admit it, but it runs normally under nt (...)
>
> :( That mea
, have you posted this bug to Netbeans. They have a support e-mail
address and a web forum that they respond to things in.
Thanks,
Kevin
> Hi,
> Has anybody tried to use netbeans in linux?
Yep.
> It is a promising IDE, but with a slight problem : It hangs when you try
> to create a new class (for eg).
And randomly when editing code - at least it here it does.
Anyway, let me guess, you enter the class name and
Hi,
Has anybody tried to use netbeans in linux?
It is a promising IDE, but with a slight problem : It hangs when you
try to create a new class (for eg).
Has anybody observed similar behavior? I am using jdk1.1.6v3a/glibc2.
I have their second beta (I refer to netbeans).
I wouldn't like to
Press Release: Technology Writers & Business Editors
Contact: Helena Stolka
Director of Marketing and Public Relations
NetBeans, Inc.
Tel: +4202 8300 7322, +420 602 294 022
Fax: +4202 8300 7399
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.netbeans.com
NetBeans, Inc. boosts functionality of its pop
I have tried it and descided that it was too slow on my machine (P2 333mhz
128mb RAM). Performace might be a bit better with a real motif library and
DYN_JAVA=true or using a jit compiler.
--jason
On 23-Jul-98 Brad Pepers wrote:
> Has anyone tried using the NetBeans IDE application on Li
Has anyone tried using the NetBeans IDE application on Linux?
I've been playing with it on RedHat 5.1 (latest glibc and other
updates) using the JDK 1.1.6v2 from Blackdown. It works a bit
but often locks up and is really slugish (running it on a
Pentium II 233MHz with 64Mb RAM).
What I wa
le-freeing memory. Commenting out the EXCEPTION_BY_SIGNALS
> define in tyaconfig.c and recompiling cured this problem for me.
I don't see the "Netbwans 2.0 beta with TYA" thread here, don't know why I
don't have it, so I'm asking now: Does this mean that you've g
Toni Nikkanen wrote:
> lots of these: TYA:CompiledCodeSignalHandler_hook--context at offset =60
> 0x42ca73b8 0xb
> Signal catched by TYA: hook for 11
I got these too with Hotjava... It looks like 1.1.6v2 is using sig 11 to
detect double-freeing memory. Commenting out the EXCEPTION_BY
> 40% of how much memory?
40% CPU. Not RAM. That's according to the normal kernel calculated system load
values. And, as I said, that's on a P133 with no other major CPU hog running.
As for RAM it's not that bad. It's currently up to 24 megs, but that's from
editing code. I imagine that if I do
--
| From: peter.schuller / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: NetBeans
| Date: Friday, July 10, 1998 2:11PM
|
| > I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to
| > run it I got only very nice w
> I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to
> run it I got only very nice welcome screen and after this nothing
> happened.
If you're on 1.1.5v7 that happens almost all the time. In 1.1.6v2 it happens
sometimes, but just try again and it should w
I have gotten it to run on my machine. It is stated somewhere in the
documentation for NetBeans that it is very likely to hang on the
splash screen and that they are working to try to resolve this. I was
running JDK1.1.5v7 and never did get past the splash screen (they
plainly state that for
--
| From: dulberg / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: NetBeans
| Date: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 1:55PM
|
| Hi,
|
| I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to
| run it I got only very nice welcome screen
Hi,
I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to
run it I got only very nice welcome screen and after this nothing
happened.
Regards,
Dima
At least the screen shot looked nice - I continually get a
'The transfer limit for this user has been reached'
error after that.
Liam.
Has anyone else had success using the free (as in free beer) beta of the
NetBeans IDE? It looks wonderful, but is way too slow on a P2-233 192MB
system interpreted.
I've tried TYA 0.7 with libc5 JDK 1.1.6v2 on a Red Hat 4.2 system with all
upgrades, and RH 5.0 system with all upgrades, t
55 matches
Mail list logo
