Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-14 Thread chang hun Park
$)C mail :83;Av 86< REMOVE > > Carlo E. Prelz @[<:GT: > > > Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes > > Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 > > > > Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through gett

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-13 Thread Richard Jones
Alex Chaffee wrote: > Slightly off-topic: > > Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone > written a free, stable two-way bridge between email and nntp? I'd love to > keep subscribing to the list digest, but be able to use a news reader to > browse the archives... It

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-13 Thread John Summerfield
On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Alex Chaffee wrote: > > > Newsgroups have a different audience and accessing method. I, for one, > > > would probably stop following this list if it became a newsgroup. > > Slightly off-topic: > > Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone > writ

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread SHUDO Kazuyuki
> > or move it to a place willing to host the java-linux and java-linux-digest > > lists. The world unfortunately isn't a place of free bandwidth forever > > and I have to make some decisions. > > java-linux is not a high-bandwidth mailing-list. > > I suggest looking at your configuration. I sugg

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Robert McConnell
Alex, There are several, both commercial and open source. At least two of the newsgroups I follow are gatewayed from mailing lists. It shouldn't take too long at dejanews to find the software involved and possibly find a friendly gateway server. Bob McConnell N2SPP At 01:25 PM 1/12/99 -0500, Al

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Alex Chaffee
> > Newsgroups have a different audience and accessing method. I, for one, > > would probably stop following this list if it became a newsgroup. Slightly off-topic: Newsgroups and mailing lists are so similar technically. Hasn't anyone written a free, stable two-way bridge between email and nntp

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]:Mailing List Changes)

1999-01-12 Thread Martin Little
Armen Yampolsky wrote: > > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > > > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > > it. > > I agree absolutely. Slashdot? Reading the

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes)

1999-01-12 Thread Armen Yampolsky
> Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. I agree absolutely. Slashdot? Reading the posts are a nightmare! It is a classi

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Richard Jones
blaise toad wrote: > > Like paul proposes, I honestly believe web based threaded discussion > are the best (a la slashdot). You obviously have free phone bills or something (unlike in the UK where you suck the 'net through a very narrow straw at very high cost). You can go to a web discussion if

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Matt Zagni
Is it fairly easy st set up a mailing list then ? How does one do it in linux - for general use ? Matt > Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:00:55 -0500 > Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:10:45 +0800 (WST) > From: John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I'd like to do one of two things with this

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Karl Asha wrote: > > I'd like to do one of two things with this mailing list, as it's really > become a significant amount of traffic. Either move it to a newsgroup, Too open to spamming (we get too much now) and email-address harvesting. > or move it to a place willing

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re:[ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Dimitris Vyzovitis
Robert McConnell wrote: > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. > I agree too. We don't need to be proactive in order t

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread David Warnock
> > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > > it. > > I agree. Mailing-list and newsgroup style discussions have much mo

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-12 Thread Pete Hardie
Robert McConnell wrote: > > Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue > to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a > browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with > it. I agree. Mailing-list and newsgroup style discussion

Re: Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Robert McConnell
Web based is the worst idea. I would much rather the messages continue to fall into my mailbox or a newsgroup than I have to load up a browser and go get them. If it moves to a web site, I won't move with it. Bob McConnell N2SPP At 07:06 PM 1/11/99 -0800, blaise toad wrote: >Like paul proposes,

Yeah! Web based threaded messaging is best (WAS: Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread blaise toad
Like paul proposes, I honestly believe web based threaded discussion are the best (a la slashdot). Newsgroup has ... nahh!! yeah I guess that would be cool. blaise (BTW thanks for many years of support to the bd folks) _ DO YOU YAHOO!

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread chang hun Park
$)C REMOVE Carlo E. Prelz @[<:GT: > Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes > Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 > > Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > > newsgroup proposed and po

RE: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Kontorotsui
On 10-Jan-99 Karl Asha wrote: > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > newsgroup proposed and possibly approved. Alternatively, I would really > appreciate a -stable- (and by stable I mean someplace that isn't going to > die within a week) to host the mailing li

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Cees de Groot
Option three would be to ask someone to explode the list for you. I'm running a setup at home with my ISP set as smarthost in my sendmail config, and that really cuts down on processing time, bandwidth, etcetera. Advantages: you get to keep the control over administration, and the one sponsoring

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread paul . wheaton
While I don't have mailing list facilities at this time, I do have web based threaded messaging. The software is supposed to include some mailing list facilities later this month. I would be happy to host this forum. Go to www.eporkchop.com, tell me what you want the forum to be named and I'

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread David S. Miller
Date:Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:40:13 +0200 From: "Carlo E. Prelz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I guess vger is the right place to relocate the list. There seems to be an e-mail address to contact people there: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At least while the 2.2.0-pre* hoopla is going on I have to

Re: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes

1999-01-11 Thread Carlo E. Prelz
Subject: [ATTENTION]: Mailing List Changes Date: Sun, Jan 10, 1999 at 10:31:59AM -0600 Quoting Karl Asha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Now my main request is for someone to hold my hand through getting a > newsgroup proposed and possibly approved. Alternatively, I would really > appre