RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-15 Thread Jesse Sarnovsky
won't be able to write to a cramfs partition, but if you're using it for storing the j2re, you wouldn't want to anyway. -Original Message- From: Shuai Liu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Shuai Liu
e how to do that or where to find related instruction? Thanks a lot. Shuai >From: "Shuai Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600? >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 17:13:42 + > >Hi, Jesse > >Than

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Jesse Sarnovsky
PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600? Hi, Jesse Thank you for the message? But 3800 with 64MB of ROM? Did you mean RAM? Because I found 3800 has only 32MB ROM. Also, I have never used a CF card before

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Shuai Liu
;To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600? >Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 08:44:59 -0500 > >I wave installed it on a 3800 with 64MB of ROM, but believe it or not, >it leaves plenty of room thanks to jffs2; however, I would recommend >installi

RE: [Java-Linux] will JRE1.3.1 fit in iPaq 3600?

2002-03-14 Thread Jesse Sarnovsky
I wave installed it on a 3800 with 64MB of ROM, but believe it or not, it leaves plenty of room thanks to jffs2; however, I would recommend installing it on a CF card. Try to leave as much room available for other more vital support utilities. Also make sure you install: libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2

RE: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-18 Thread thanhnam_java
Dear All Have you got the J@Whiz test program for Java 2 Platform? Could you help me having J@Whiz? Thank Nam -Original Message- From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 6:10 AM To: Christopher Smith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Java

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-14 Thread ed phillips
> > > >Chris! > > > > > >I missed your talk at JavaOne, and not just because it was so early in > >the morning. ;-) > > > >I missed the entire conference because I had some important things to > >take care of, i.e. work! > > > >Are you going to post slides from your presentation anywhere? Can you

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-14 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-06-03 Thread David Brownell
> > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? > > > > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including > > more natural and efficient integration with native code, > > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some > > aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working > > be

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Christopher Smith
On 31 May 2001 16:09:38 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? > > Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including > more natural and efficient integration with native code, > as well as faster startup and the ability to do some > aggressive ahead-

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread David Brownell
I may have missed this ... will this be covering GCJ? Compiled Java has some nice advantages. Including more natural and efficient integration with native code, as well as faster startup and the ability to do some aggressive ahead-of-time optimizations, and working better with standard OS tools

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 10:58:08 -0700, ed phillips wrote: > > Thanks for providing this pre-session back and forth. Although I'm excited by > > Probably the only way I can get people to show up for 8:30am (someone at > KeyMedia obviously doesn't like me). > > > the prospects a

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread ed phillips
Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when J

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Thomas Enderes
Hi, will there be anyone involved with the ARM / iPAQ ports around at the JavaOne ? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-31 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 31 May 2001 08:24, Christopher Smith wrote: > On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > > > > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this

Re: Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-30 Thread Christopher Smith
On 31 May 2001 06:45:08 +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote: > > 4) Use JNI to use Linux's various asynch I/O API's. > Option 4) is how BEA WebLogic Server does it, ( I think ). They have this > libmuxer.so ( which is also available for Solaris -- dont know why when JVM > for Solaris makes use of sola

Fwd: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-30 Thread Jesus M. Salvo Jr.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I meant this to be sent to the mailing list, but I selected "Reply" originally instead of "Reply To All" - -- Forwarded Message ------ Subject: Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:23:46 +1000 Fro

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 21:25:20 -0700 ed phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if > you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate > them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of > the to

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread ed phillips
Excuse me, It is a session not a BoF, but the question still might be helpful pre-session. Christopher Smith wrote: > --On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered > > Java Technology-

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread ed phillips
Chris, It might be helpful and may even spawn other suggestions if you were to flesh out in a post some of the aspects, as you articulate them, of scaling Java on Linux. Perhaps a kind of pre-BoF statement of the topic to be discussed? Thanks, Ed Phillips Christopher Smith wrote: > --On Tue

Re: Java/Linux at JavaOne

2001-05-29 Thread Christopher Smith
--On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 15:01:25 -0700 Nelson Minar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Penguin Gets Pumped Up . . . Turning Linux into a High-Powered > Java Technology-Based Application Server > Java/Linux performance talk > http://servlet.java.sun.com/javaone/conf/sessions/934/0-sf2001.jsp

Re: Java-Linux on StrongArm

2001-05-05 Thread Charles Forsythe
"Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote: > > > PocketLinux and Kaffe are free (GPL) software, however non-GPL licenses > > of the PocketLinux Kaffee JVM are available for a fee. Several PDA > > Is that legal? I thought once you GPLed code you cannot offer it under > a different license since it is l

Re: Java-Linux on StrongArm

2001-05-05 Thread Alexander V. Konstantinou
> PocketLinux and Kaffe are free (GPL) software, however non-GPL licenses > of the PocketLinux Kaffee JVM are available for a fee. Several PDA Is that legal? I thought once you GPLed code you cannot offer it under a different license since it is likely to contain third-party contributions? Ale

Re: Java-Linux on StrongArm

2001-05-05 Thread Charles Forsythe
Mike Sprauve wrote: > > Can anyone tell me what the status is of the JDK > running on Linux to the Intel StrongArm. I also need > AWT support of that port I don't know about Blackdown's JDK, but the Kaffe VM is the "real meat" of PocketLinux, which runs on StrongArm devices. You didn't give an

Re: Java - Linux - Oracle

2000-10-13 Thread Barnet Wagman
> Unfortunatly When I try to install Oracle 8i, i get a message that Java VM > not started. It's really a question of of where Oracle is looking for Java. Many apps that use Java look for JAVA_HOME environmental variable. If so, your .bashrc should contain export JAVA_HOME=path_to_jdk_dir

Re: Java - Linux - Oracle

2000-10-13 Thread paul campbell
These articles seem to discuss your question. http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-2000-04/lw-04-oracle8i-2.html http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-05/lw-05-oracle.html http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-06/lw-06-oracle-2.html At 11:28 PM 10/12/00, Santhosh Joseph wrote: >

Re: Java - Linux - Oracle

2000-10-13 Thread Paul T. McNally
Santhosh Joseph wrote: > Friends, > I'm relativly new to Linux/Java/Oracle. As a first step, i tried to > install Oracle 8i on my linuxbox (Red Hat 6.2 - which is the downloadable > version supplied along with a popular magazine ). Fortunatly, the CD carried a > script file, which installed Java

Re: Java/Linux Resources from IBM

2000-10-11 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > > Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM wrote: > > > > > > A proposal for fixing the Java programming language's threading problems > > > - > > > Allen Holub suggests that the Ja

Re: Java/Linux Resources from IBM

2000-10-11 Thread Matt Peterson
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Joseph Shraibman wrote: > > > Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM wrote: > > > > > > A proposal for fixing the Java programming language's threading problems > > > - > > > Allen Holub suggests that the Ja

Re: Java/Linux Resources from IBM

2000-10-11 Thread Matt Peterson
Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM wrote: > > A proposal for fixing the Java programming language's threading problems > - > Allen Holub suggests that the Java programming language's threading model > is possibly the weakest part

Re: Java/Linux Resources from IBM

2000-10-10 Thread Nathan Meyers
Joseph Shraibman wrote: > Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM wrote: > > > > A proposal for fixing the Java programming language's threading problems > > - > > Allen Holub suggests that the Java programming language's threading mo

Re: Java/Linux Resources from IBM

2000-10-10 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Jeffrey I Condon/Cupertino/IBM wrote: > > A proposal for fixing the Java programming language's threading problems > - > Allen Holub suggests that the Java programming language's threading model > is possibly the weakest part

RE: Java-Linux I18N Tutorial

2000-02-01 Thread Lee_Xing
Hi Renzo: Thank you for the information you put together. It helps. Regards, Lee -Original Message- From: Renzo Pecoraro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 2:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Java-Linux I18N Tutorial All - I started a little Java-Linux I1

Re: Java-Linux I18N

2000-01-19 Thread Renzo Pecoraro
JackWang - The font.properties file typically only maps Java font properties ("MonoSpaced", "SansSerif", etc.) to the actual fonts available on the client machine. Changing the font.properties file on the server makes no sense, as the server in a client/server or applet/servlet or whatever archit

Re: Java-Linux I18N

2000-01-19 Thread Renzo Pecoraro
Actually, I have noticed one problem that so far is a mystery to me. Somehow under Linux (with JDK 1.2.2) something seems to get lost when trying to write to an OutputStreamWriter with a specified encoding, if the string is not iso-8859-1, but my machine is. Sun has some sample code on their I18N

RE: Java-Linux I18N

2000-01-17 Thread Lee_Xing
Renzo: Thank you very much for your help and information. It's very helpful. I'll send time to digest all of the information and give it a try. Regards, PS. This msg may not be able to be posted in the mail list. I don't know why. Lee -Original Message- From: Renzo Pecoraro [mail

Re: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #54

1999-10-20 Thread Ulli Kortenkamp
>> I wonder how much speedup can be achieved by using tools like >> Jopt ( http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~markusj ). Are >> there any benchmarks yet? We have a lot of experience using JAX (alphaworks), and we got a noticable speedup. Sorry, we did no benchmarks, but it seems

Re: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #54

1999-10-18 Thread Patrick LAM
> I wonder how much speedup can be achieved by using tools like > Jopt ( http://www-i2.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/~markusj ). Are there any > benchmarks yet? If you keep an eye on the Sable website, by next week there will be a technical report describing how much speedup you can obtain with inlin

RE: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #49

1999-10-15 Thread Dan Kelly
How do I unsubscribe from the java-linux-digest mailing list?   [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, October 15, 1999 7:06 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #49

Re: Java Linux ATM Sockets

1999-10-06 Thread Pete Hardie
Dimitris Terzis wrote: > Do you think there would be any interest in releasing this as open source to > the community? If yes, I could persuade the folks over here to allow me > doing so and will send over the current code as an alpha version, which we > could then play with and improve (and/or us

Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux

1999-08-12 Thread Ted Neward
IL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, August 09, 1999 10:25 PM Subject: Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux >Nathan Meyers wrote: > >> Bryce McKinlay wrote: >> > >> > If you're

Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux

1999-08-12 Thread Rebecca . A . Sanford
om: Calvin Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/11/99 23:51 GMT Please respond to Calvin Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Rebecca A Sanford/GDIS/GDYN@GDIS cc: Subject: Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux That exception can be generated by any uncaught ex

Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux

1999-08-11 Thread Bryce McKinlay
Nathan Meyers wrote: > Bryce McKinlay wrote: > > > > If you're using ORBacus, you should use ORBacus's jidl compiler > > (www.orbacus.com). You can not use the classes generated by Sun's IDL compiler > > with ORBacus (or vice-versa). > > After diving into the list archives, I find a confusing mix

Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux

1999-08-11 Thread Nathan Meyers
Bryce McKinlay wrote: > > If you're using ORBacus, you should use ORBacus's jidl compiler > (www.orbacus.com). You can not use the classes generated by Sun's IDL compiler > with ORBacus (or vice-versa). After diving into the list archives, I find a confusing mix of messages about this situation.

Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux

1999-08-11 Thread Bryce McKinlay
If you're using ORBacus, you should use ORBacus's jidl compiler (www.orbacus.com). You can not use the classes generated by Sun's IDL compiler with ORBacus (or vice-versa). regards [ bryce ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've recently switched to using Linux (RedHat 6.0 on Pentium II). Since I

Re: [java-linux] Needing help integrating ORBacus with Java-Linux

1999-08-11 Thread Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I've recently switched to using Linux (RedHat 6.0 on Pentium II). Since I > wanted to do some Java CORBA applications, I downloaded the Blackdown JDK > (specifically JDK-1.2/i386/pre-v2/glibc2.1/jdk1.2pre-v2.tar.bz2). I compiled > and ran a simple grid demo

Re: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #214

1999-06-07 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> Jonathan Schilling writes: >> The JIT is one developed by Sun, but it's a lot slower than >> the one Sun obtained from Symantec that is included in the windows >> version of java. Which in turn is said to be slower than hotspot >> for long-running programs. Jonathan> I

Re: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #214

1999-06-07 Thread Jonathan Schilling
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 00:50:54 -0700 (PDT) > From: "J.P.Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Mike Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc: java linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: JIT in pre2??? > > The JIT is one developed by Sun, but it's a lot slower than > the one Sun obtained from Symantec that

Re: java-linux-digest Digest V99 #130

1999-04-15 Thread Marius Schamschula
Feng-Cheng, You beat me to the post. I've got a similar, related?, problem. I have two machines, both running mkLinux DR3. The older runs jdk117_v1a. I've got a simple directory listing cgi, JFind, running under Apache (I directly use java, not Jserv, via a shell wrapper). It returns the correct

Re: Java Linux and Signal Handlers

1999-04-13 Thread Rob Nugent
Juergen, Many thanks for the info. It is not my desire to mix java and native code in the way you describe, but the following: I am working in a C environment, and I need to be able to call subroutines in a number of (pluggable) languages, of which one is Java. Some of those languages run-times

Re: Java-Linux mailing list weirdnesses

1999-03-15 Thread Thorsten Gebuhr
Date sent: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:08:28 -0500 From: Martin Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Java-Linux mailing list weirdnesses > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > John Summerfield wrote: &g

Re: Java-Linux mailing list weirdnesses

1999-03-15 Thread Nathan Meyers
Martin Little wrote: > > > > Perhaps this would be a good time to add a challenge-response mechanism > > > > to the subscription process -- an initial piece of mail requiring the > > > > subscriber to confirm the subscription. > > > > ... > I think there was a misunderstandin

Re: Java-Linux mailing list weirdnesses

1999-03-15 Thread Martin Little
Nathan Meyers wrote: > John Summerfield wrote: > > > Perhaps this would be a good time to add a challenge-response mechanism > > > to the subscription process -- an initial piece of mail requiring the > > > subscriber to confirm the subscription. > > > > I hate that idea. better to set the list

Re: Java-Linux mailing list weirdnesses

1999-03-15 Thread Nathan Meyers
John Summerfield wrote: > > Perhaps this would be a good time to add a challenge-response mechanism > > to the subscription process -- an initial piece of mail requiring the > > subscriber to confirm the subscription. > > I hate that idea. better to set the list up properly so that mailing errors

Re: Java-Linux mailing list weirdnesses

1999-03-15 Thread John Summerfield
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Nathan Meyers wrote: > This mailing list appears to be finding its way into a lot of unwelcome > mailboxes... seems that every time I send something out to java-linux, I > get a "please stop sending me mail" complaint from someone. My best > guess is that some prankster somew

Re: Java-Linux enthusiasts

1999-02-16 Thread Joel Shellman
John Goerzen wrote: > A valid categorization, I believe. I clearly belong best to #4, but a > difference is that I believe that Linux will be overtaken by something else. > Hurd, for instance, when it gets more stable (but we're looking at years > here). I think I might second this--I like Linux

Re: Java-Linux enthusiasts

1999-02-16 Thread John Goerzen
A valid categorization, I believe. I clearly belong best to #4, but a difference is that I believe that Linux will be overtaken by something else. Hurd, for instance, when it gets more stable (but we're looking at years here). Java has serious problems with speed, bloat, licensing and open-ne

Re: java-linux hosting

1999-01-21 Thread Mario Camou
Dwight Frye wrote: > Mario Camou writes : > > I read the recent messages Re: hosting the list. Another option might be OneList > > (http://www.onelist.com). It's a free list-hosting service (paid for by > > advertising, 3 or 4 lines on each message). They also have list archiving and a > > web-ba

Re: java-linux hosting

1999-01-21 Thread Dwight Frye
Mario Camou writes : > I read the recent messages Re: hosting the list. Another option might be OneList > (http://www.onelist.com). It's a free list-hosting service (paid for by > advertising, 3 or 4 lines on each message). They also have list archiving and a > web-based admin interface. Thought i

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-20 Thread stoerk
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999, hackit usolame wrote: > hey > i did all what u told me , but its still not work (i added the path > line to > my profile) , and now i can execute the /jdk1.1.5/bin from every > directory > : but its still giving me error message well , this is the error > SecMgr

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-18 Thread JONATHAN HEMINGWAY
unsubscribe.

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-18 Thread Michael Sinz
On Mon, 18 Jan 1999 11:12:59 -0800 (PST), hackit usolame wrote: >hey >i did all what u told me , but its still not work (i added the path >line to >my profile) , and now i can execute the /jdk1.1.5/bin from every >directory >: but its still giving me error message well , this is the

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-17 Thread Braulio W. Gergull
Hi, hackit usolame wrote: > > hey brett W. McCoy !!! > i'm kinda new in linux , i'm using it just 1 month , i understand that > i should add the jdk direcory to the path , but where is the file that > i have to set the path line in ? (in dos its AUTOEXEC.BAT , > PATH=c:\blablabla) , but where is

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-17 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, hackit usolame wrote: > i'm kinda new in linux , i'm using it just 1 month , i understand that > i should add the jdk direcory to the path , but where is the file that > i have to set the path line in ? (in dos its AUTOEXEC.BAT , > PATH=c:\blablabla) , but where is it on linu

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-17 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, hackit usolame wrote: > no no thats not the problem i'm IN the directory , i even > click on the file with Midnight Commander , but its still telling me > not such file , i think the problem is that the java file is > looking for other file , that isnt exits... m

Re: java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-01-17 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, hackit usolame wrote: > hey ,i have some problem. i downloaded jdk 1.1.5 , and i did : > installpkg jdk.blabla.tar.gz , and when i'm going to the > /jdk1.1.5/bin/... , and when i'm execute the file : JAVA , its telling > me "no such file" , but the file is there ! , i

Re: JAVA/Linux problem

1998-11-29 Thread Gregg G. Wonderly
>class David >{ >public static void main( String[] args ) >{ >System.out.println( "Hello!" ); >} >} Making David public would be a good idea. - [EMAIL PROTECTED] (C2 Technologies Inc)

Re: java-linux-digest Digest V98 #13

1998-11-29 Thread Armen Yampolsky
Hi Sam, Your question probably does not belong on the java-linux list, as far as I can tell. It is just a java coding problem, right? I looked at it -- but you have a method call gcd() on line 44 -- this doesn't belong to anything. It is outside of the scope of init(), and outside the scope of t

Re: JAVA/Linux problem

1998-11-28 Thread Troy Wu
You need to append the directory containing David.class to your CLASSPATH environment variable; e.g., export CLASSPATH=/some/dir/1:/some/dir/2:/your/class/dir where /your/class/dir contains David.class. --troy On Fri, 27 Nov 1998, David House wrote: I just installed the J

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-14 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 12 Nov 1998, olivier Dulac wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions > about the list itself, and people using it... > > 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list > >*please* put a header in front of e

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-13 Thread
> >I also want to ask everyone there to *please* skip all the irrelevant > >when they include a message for a reply... > sound nice, but how are you going to define "irrelevant", e.g. which > part of your message should I leave out ?? Leave just enough information so that people can figu

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Mark Hofmann
Hi .. olivier Dulac wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions > about the list itself, and people using it... > > 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list > >*please* put a header in front of every email for t

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Seth M. Landsman
On Thu, Nov 12, 1998 at 10:46:13PM +0100, olivier Dulac wrote: > > Hi, > > Sorry for this isn't a java-related message, but it a few suggestions > about the list itself, and people using it... > > 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list > >*please* put a

Re: [Java-Linux] about this list ...

1998-11-12 Thread Nelson Minar
> 1) include [Java-linux] in your Subject:, for every mails to this list No, please don't. There's no point. This list has been running just fine for two years without anyone doing this. All mail from this list already comes with this header: Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any decent mail sof

Re: Java-Linux networking problem < Connection refused > SOLVED!

1998-10-05 Thread Glenn Valenta
Thanks to all who helped. As much as I thought I had both client and server on the same port, I didn't. My code said I did, but what I compiled and posted on the webpage didn't. Using telnet and netstat gave me my first clue. Thanks all! Michael Sinz wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Oct 1998 06:21:19

Re: Java-Linux networking problem < Connection refused >

1998-10-05 Thread Michael Sinz
On Mon, 05 Oct 1998 06:21:19 +, Glenn Valenta wrote: >I'm new to Java and also not too experienced in Linux so forgive me >if this is a simple question, but I couldn't find it in the FAQs. > >When I try to open a network socket, I get... > > java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused >

Re: JAVA-LINUX

1998-09-22 Thread Paul V. Drobnich
> Hi, i'm using RH 4.2 and i installed jdk1.1.6 for linux. > The installation was susccesfully. > I wrote a litle code(Hello Wold) but when i run javac Hello, it gives me a > message like that one: > > No Library path set. > Failed to locate native function: > java/lang/System.currentTimeMill

Re: java-linux, reliabilety

1998-09-15 Thread Michael Sinz
On Wed, 16 Sep 1998 13:57:27 -0700, Lukas Hazlehurst wrote: > >>> Is java on linux reliable enough to run on a box by itself for a >>> considerable period of time, or would C be more appropriate ? >> >>I have had NO PROBLEMS with Linux Java for server software. I've had >>some problems with AWT-

Re: java-linux, reliabilety

1998-09-15 Thread Lukas Hazlehurst
>> Is java on linux reliable enough to run on a box by itself for a >> considerable period of time, or would C be more appropriate ? > >I have had NO PROBLEMS with Linux Java for server software. I've had >some problems with AWT-related stuff, but that's... well, the Java >burden at this point i

Re: java-linux, reliabilety

1998-09-14 Thread James Cassidy
Hi Lukas, I asked this exact question many months ago. I'm pleased to say now that I've found both Linux and Java have been quite reliable for my project. I've currently got RTLinux and Java running in our company's new networkable instrument. All the real time stuff is written in C and runs

Re: java-linux, reliabilety

1998-09-14 Thread Charles Forsythe
> Is java on linux reliable enough to run on a box by itself for a > considerable period of time, or would C be more appropriate ? I have had NO PROBLEMS with Linux Java for server software. I've had some problems with AWT-related stuff, but that's... well, the Java burden at this point in time.

RE: Java-Linux

1998-09-03 Thread Kegel, Dan
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux.html has the ports. Be sure to read http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/libraries.html and http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/faq/FAQ-java-linux.html first! - Dan > -Original Message- > From: Günter Zell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wedne

Re: java-linux

1998-08-25 Thread Kenny Freeman
www.blackdown.org follow the java link from there On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Aaron Brick wrote: > i tried to subscribe to the mailing list; it failed when it decided that > java-linux.org doesn't exist. how can i get on it, please? > > thanks. > > aaron brick. > >

RE: Java/Linux dB's

1998-08-24 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
We are waiting for your results > -Original Message- > From: Nick Davies [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 24, 1998 3:35 PM > To: Java-Linux Mailing list > Subject: Java/Linux dB's > > Many thanks for the rapid replies everyone (M$ tech. support are still > enga

Re: Java/Linux dB's

1998-08-24 Thread Michael Jürgens
Hi, just try SOLID, a full ANSI compatible RDBMS. The new Version 2.3 has a fast JDBC-Driver. Look at http://www.solid.fi for an evaluation copy! Ciao, Michael Mit vielen Grüßen i.A. Michael Jürgens FACTUM Projektentwicklung und Management GmbH --- Phone: (49) 2 31 / 97 53 54 - 0 Fax:(49

Re: Java-Linux www?

1998-06-04 Thread Karl Asha
You probably missed the news, the web site is back on www.blackdown.org now, and has been for the last few weeks. It's staying there from now on. If you'd like to point www.javalinux.org over to it, we could sort that out. Cheers, Karl Ean Schuessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Man, the we