RE: Open Java

1998-11-06 Thread Troy Wu
On Thu, 5 Nov 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | > Java Linux porting team politics. The folks who have donated their | > effort to bringing Java to Linux - all of them - have done a wonderful | > job. Thanks to you all! Agreed. | > >The big problem I have is the current closed

RE: Open Java

1998-11-05 Thread A . KLOS
-- | From: sbb / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: nelson / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Cc: java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Open Java | Date: Thursday, November 05, 1998 7:53AM | | Nelson Minar writes: | > I'd really hate to see this list get dragged into a debat

Re: Open Java

1998-11-04 Thread Java News Collector
At 11:44 PM 11/4/98 -0500, Nelson Minar wrote: >I'd really hate to see this list get dragged into a debate about >Java Linux porting team politics. The folks who have donated their >effort to bringing Java to Linux - all of them - have done a wonderful >job. Thanks to you all! Agreed. --- big s

Re: "Open" Java/was: Swing in JDK 1.2

1998-08-11 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
Note removal of crossposts. I am not sure whether this is an appropriate list either, so my apologies. > worried about Sun defining ISO Java specifications that include > sucks hacks and com.sun.java.swing. What we really need is a more > open "open process" from Sun. What we would need is an