Well unless it is put up on the ports page nobody will know about it.
Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have done a linux/java 1.2 port to alpha
/gat
Jo Uthus wrote:
> Ilya wrote:
>
> | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
> I recently attended a seminar
I have done a linux/java 1.2 port to alpha
/gat
Jo Uthus wrote:
> Ilya wrote:
>
> | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
> I recently attended a seminar where COMPAQ talked about their ongoing
> Linux-work.
>
> The representative said that JDK1.2 would be ready fo
Yes.. ditto. I'd like to know what that means as well. ( not in an accusing
way ) does that mean 1.3 port will be easy? Or does this not really mean
anything?
Thanks Blackdown!
-Riyad
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Agermose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, A
I have done a port.
gat
Ilya wrote:
> Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Uncle George wrote:
| I have ported the java 1.2 ( but not 1.2.1, or 1.2.2 ) some time in the
| beginning of this (1999 ) year my non-comm license will expire in the
| middle of december though, and Sun has refused to renew that license, or
| offer any other in its place.
| gat
|
| /http://ww
I have ported the java 1.2 ( but not 1.2.1, or 1.2.2 ) some time in the
beginning of this (1999 ) year my non-comm license will expire in the
middle of december though, and Sun has refused to renew that license, or
offer any other in its place.
gat
/http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/Java.html
Jo
Ilya wrote:
| Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
I recently attended a seminar where COMPAQ talked about their ongoing
Linux-work.
The representative said that JDK1.2 would be ready for Alpha late
December, although this is _not_ stated anywhere on their website
Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court.
> With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it -
> and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me
> - these passwords aren't
Cees de Groot wrote:
> Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
>
> > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court.
> > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it -
> > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me
> > - these passw
Artur Biesiadowski wrote:
> I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court.
> With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it -
> and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me
> - these passwords aren't very secure, are they
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Cees de Groot wrote:
> Oliver Fels wrote:
>
> > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet:
> >
> > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform
> > available to the developer community.
> >
>
> Yes, but *please* think twice before committing
This makes very good sense.
On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Cees de Groot wrote:
> Oliver Fels wrote:
>
> > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet:
> >
> > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform
> > available to the developer community.
> >
>
> Yes, but *please*
Cees de Groot wrote:
> Yes, but *please* think twice before committing your soul to Sun!
>
> I hope it is clear that the second you agree to their license, you can forget
> about contributing to Japhar, Classpath, Kaffe, etcetera - the real Open Source
> alternatives to Sun's JDK. If your compan
Oliver Fels wrote:
> Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet:
>
> Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform
> available to the developer community.
>
Yes, but *please* think twice before committing your soul to Sun!
I hope it is clear that the second you ag
Jim Waldo - SMI Software Development wrote:
>
> Hi folks --
>
> Any words on when the Java 2 (aka 1.2) port is available? I would love to get
> a port of Jini out on Linux early (and often), but we are completely 1.2
> based.
>
> Any words you could give would be a help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jim W
15 matches
Mail list logo
