On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Mark Christiaens wrote:
> I'm not familiar with this benchmark. What is better? Higher or lower
> values? Can these benchmarks also be run on a 1.1 JVM? I'm especially
> interested in the IBM machine which is 1.1.8.
We have results from IBM's 1.1.8 somewhere around here,
Ok. Are the numbers in seconds or is a higher number better?
/Jesper
Patrick LAM wrote:
> I ran a few benchmarks to compare the different JVM's out there, on the
> SPEC benchmarks plus two of our internal benchmarks, sablecc (a parser
> generator), and soot, a frozen version of our analysis fra
I ran a few benchmarks to compare the different JVM's out there, on the
SPEC benchmarks plus two of our internal benchmarks, sablecc (a parser
generator), and soot, a frozen version of our analysis framework.
Here are the results. These results are not scientific; in particular, I
only ran each
