it looks like i will have to compile the JDK
to figure out my glibc2.1.2 troubles.
i read the page
http://www.place.org/~stevemw/java/FAQ/README.linux.src.txt
is this the latest data on compiling? can i
use this to compile the latest versions?
thanks for the input! i don't see others getting
m
i wonder if someone can provide some insight
on the garbage collection and heap size.
i wrote a program (below) in a loop
and recorded the response times and heap size.
when i started it, i was able to run the loop
125 times per second, using 11% CPU. after several minutes,
i ran out of memory (
Edson (& java-linx),
this code below runs out of heap space even faster than
my original program. sorry the code probably does not
look good after being pasted into this email..
but the basic -->test<-- is to write some code which
will 1) actually do something and 2) will run -->FOREVER<--
(well
values, and so on, I'm developing a healt care app, and
>I know what about it. But Java (especially JSP and Servlets) is more
>stable (I can't guarantee Linux version) than Visual Basic (by example)
>and anyone take less errors coding in Java than C.
>
>[]s
>
>Edson
:53 PM 1/5/00 -0200, Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter wrote:
>I'm sorry: cpu usage is not 100% because Java:
>53% java, 47% Apache Server...
>
>Actual report:
>
>86000 loops, 7128K ram + 5072K virt, rt.free()=2097144
>
>Edson Richter
>
>--
>From: Michael
parision based on report from Michael E. Moores
>using the same program (see bellow) and anotating reports about memory
>usage (and, of course, stability). Michael reported a crash after 45000
>loops in Linux JDK1.2.2 ("linux 2.2, blackdown 1.2 (glibc 1.2.1)").
>
>My comp
han Meyers wrote:
>"Michael E. Moores" wrote:
>>
>> i want to know that i can use the blackdown implementation
>> for serving a medium volume ecommerce site which is responsible
>> for millions of dollars of revenue.
>> so far, not so good. but i am not a s
,
>in which case I'm sick of it. I might be imagining things...
>
>
>At 21:47 1/5/00 -0800, Michael E. Moores wrote:
>[...]
>>i work in one of the biggest linux shops in the world.
>[...]
>>millions of hits, download at 50+Mbits/second, do lots of complex dynami
that is a valuable (non-political.. hee hee)
data point ekkehard.
so you must be using glibc2.1.2?
i am using mandrake 6.1, which uses glibc2.1.1,
so i have also been using JDK 1.2 RC2 to be compatible.
i wonder if glibc is causing some of the problesm?
i am also seeing some intermittent thre
i'm not sure if i need that kind of performance,
but it looks pretty nice and at 1000 bucks a machine
it might be effective. i'm still messing around with
all the messy glibc stuff; down the road
when the term "RC" no longer applies, i would rather say i
am doing credit card charges with blackdow
that is good news.
i did alot of the same kind of testing.
i did "new Integer[100]"
and i never ran out of heap.
again, i want to look at what libraries your jdk is depending on.
i may have to point my cheap finger at glibc.
i have been using RC2/glibc1.2.1 cause my 3rd party
JNI interface cr
?
thanks,
--michael
At 06:09 PM 1/6/00 +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> >>>>> Michael E Moores writes:
>
> Michael> that is a valuable (non-political.. hee hee)
> Michael> data point ekkehard.
>
> Michael> so you must be using glibc2.1.2?
>
so vexing.
At 01:25 AM 1/8/00 -0600, Chris Abbey wrote:
>At 07:19 1/6/00 -0800, "Michael E. Moores" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>you are TOTALLY incorrect in your assumptions
>>about where i am using roxen.
>
>then I whole heartedly appologize for my confusion.
&
r now i am the only person trying this stuff out, the only
person who really wants to put time into this.
apparently, other attempts w/ commercial implementations in the past have
not done as well; so i have alot going against me.
At 11:59 AM 1/8/00 -0800, Nathan Meyers wrote:
>"Mich
14 matches
Mail list logo
