JDK1.1.6v4a socket problem

n (v4a) strace - not too difficult to miss something, though... Cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Thread dump?

I seem to have forgotten the incantation to get the VM to print a "full thread dump" on demand - I had thought it was C-\, but it just core dumps. I'm currently using the glibc 116v3a. Thanks, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Write Once Run Anywhere?

t use a floppy/ZipDisk, I'll pre-zip my class tree. good luck, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Java and CVS

27;ve written a custom system builder (in java, of course) that handles our compile. Cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

JDK 1.1.7 source released yet?

Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution yet? Sun keeps pointing me at files on their server that don't exist. thanks, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: rmid with JDK1.1.6

nly in regards to RMI. We've been using RMI (client, server and compile-time) on all of {windoze,linux,solaris,macos} since the beta days of 1.1 - I'm not sure what you could be looking for that isn't there. cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Sun's ORB & Java-Linux

;d also be great if the ORB is actually stable. > Suggestions for alternative ORBs perhaps ? There were a number of pre-release versions of JavaIDL for 1.1.x versions - I occasionally use one that came off a sun developers CD, but you can probably find an archived copy somewhere. cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reusable threads?

t it. If not (bummer), I guess I must introduce explicit end state detection (My problem is, of course, rather more complex than the example given here, but the issues are similar). Thanks, - Michael Thome [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: java dead?

partially due to the misleading claims that Win95 was a 32-bit OS. Cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Java threading

e had a burst of thread creation that completely choked the windows native thread system. Haven't looked at the 1.1.7a diffs yet - anyone working on something like this for Linux? cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Some initial impressions (was: emacs vs xemacs)

those IBM Alphaworks guys would release the VM-side code and/or spec for their profiler (Jinsight) project so us Linux users could benefit, too... cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: Sorry: Ignore that last post (Is this a JVM bug? Why is my localvariable not initialized?)

is that you are doing a sufficiently complex thing as to expose some of the (as always, somewhat arbitrary) language design choices. As this level, any of the choices would result in someone's mental model being violated. Java threading is in an even worse position - the syntax was made so trivial as to fool people into thinking that writing threaded code is easy. Cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: jdk 1.1.7.1a / tya 1.2v3 performance?

/ 1000)); > System.out.println("iterations/second: " + rate); > } > } > When I run this on my PPro 200 Redhat 5.1 box, I see the following: > CLASSPATH="testmain:$CLASSPATH" java test.testmain > TYA 1.2v3 (for J117 / Linux

two-tier threading for Java-linux?

he results uninteresting. So, for now, while I run my green-threaded java VM, I keep the other CPU of my SMP machine busy running seti@home and playing mp3s ... Cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To U

favorite code beautifiers?

long as such features are configurable). Thanks, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

JPDA for linux?

ogram?). Any hints or soothing words (like the blackdown team will include it in the next release) would be most appreciated. thanks, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT

Question on non-standard (-Xfoo) options

erence from the other ports with little actual benefit. 2. -Xrs is described as "reduc[ing] the use of operating system signals." Does this have any effect under Linux? Can anyone comment on what it actually does (or is supposed to do)? thanks much, -mik -- Michae

SEGVs under 1.2prev2

at is really going on. Are core dumps, etc of interest to anyone in the porting team at this point? While the dumps are easy to pass along, the java code which elicits this behavior is too large and complex to usefully turn into a test case. thanks, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROT

memory allocation under SMP

one thread? -mik (disclaimer - I know nothing about Hoard beyond what's on their web page, and even less about standard VM malloc use.) -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Good job on 1.2.2RC*, comments

ectual dishonesty to claim authorship of someone else's works, even if you own rights of distribution. That said, it appears that Sun has done a pretty reasonable job at assigning due credit in their recent PRs. -mik -- Michae

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

clues to rub together - not only about techical details and development politics, but also about what is really important. I wouldn't be surprised if Sun's and Inprise's PR people genuinely thought that the Blackdown group consisted entirely of Sun employees and paid ghostwrite

occasional SEGVs in 122rc4

ead. Clearly, something other than deep recursion can result in a SOE. The question is, what? I've assumed that Lots of live threads can do it. Also, I cannot find out what the java stack size limit is or how to change it (yes, I already know how to set the *native* stack limits). Thanks m

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

27;t come across anyone who really understands the need and is in the position of doing something about it *and* is up to the task (I know I'm not). Several times I've heard that the mozilla libs have a possible implementation, but I don't know enough about 'em to tell if this is true.

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Welsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think the best answer is to do the second tier threading in userspace >> (best would be in glibc). > While on the surface this l

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

>>>>> "Stefaan" == Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 09-Jun-2000 Michael Thome wrote: >> I think the best answer is to do the second tier threading in userspace >> (best would be in glibc). The kernel folks have some good points &

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

rd hand is the issue that java-runtime-space schedulers cannot timeslice - green and native threads can make progress where a written-in-java scheduler depends on good behavior of the code being scheduled. This is only *not* an issue when the scheduled bit

Re: JavaOne - no green threads for Linux

>>>>> "Matt" == Matt Welsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> Agreed - beginners *do* tend to use too many threads, > This has nothing to do with "beginners"! Sorry - I didn&#x

Anyone using blackdown jdk on SMP linux?

almost identical behavior. The "Sun" 1.3 beta with hotspot actually doesn't throw these exceptions - it silently hangs instead. BTW - I'm using a 2-cpu intel machine w/ various late-2.3-series kernels and glibc 2.1.3. Should I just give up on SMP+Java for the foreseeable futur

Re: Anyone using blackdown jdk on SMP linux?

;m mostly using Blackdown 1.2.2RC4 with javacomp (though jit doesn't >> seem to matter). IBM JDK1.3 beta exhibits almost identical behavior. >> The "Sun" 1.3 beta with hotspot actually doesn't throw these >> except

Re: Anyone using blackdown jdk on SMP linux?

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Michael Thome wrote: >> >> >>>>> "Calvin" == Calvin Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Submit it as a bug and/or send us the short ex

Re: Anyone using blackdown jdk on SMP linux?

;> Scott >> If you don't see it in under 30 seconds, you are probably not having the same problem I'm having. -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Anyone using blackdown jdk on SMP linux?

>>>>> "Scott" == Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Scott Murray wrote: >> >> Michael Thome wrote: >> > >> > >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >

Re: Who is right?

g d = new String(b); String e = d.intern(); (a==b) // required to be true! (a!=c) // required to be true. (c!=d) // required to be true. (a==e) // required to be true. and, of course, they are all .equals(). See JLS (2nd ed), pp 27. cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EM

/dev/random with SecureRandom?

kdown already does this? Cheers, -mik -- Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Blackdown VM control options?

How do the solaris VM's -XX options map to those in blackdown's VM (intel 1.3.1, for instance)? The following link has lots of documentation on -XX options to control hotspot... it isn't clear which, if any, are available on linux and what the iterpretation would be if they are: http://ja