* mailto:marti...@google.com>>
Date: Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: RFR: 8194651: javadoc: mark the com.sun.javadoc API for removal
To: Jonathan Gibbons mailto:jonathan.gibb...@oracle.com>>
Cc: javadoc-dev mailto:javadoc-dev@openjdk.java.net>>
I can confirm that it is this
Martin,
Thanks for the investigation and the update. Sorry for the inconvenience.
-- Jon
On 2/10/18 8:20 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
OK, I get it now. jdk tip needs
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk10/rev/107413b070b9 *in the
bootstrap* to bootstrap with jdk10, but that is coming out as par
OK, I get it now. jdk tip needs
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk10/rev/107413b070b9 *in the bootstrap* to
bootstrap with jdk10, but that is coming out as part of jdk-10+43, which
hasn't been released yet. So this will fix itself over time. I can
confirm that jdk tip bootstraps with jdk 10 tip a
I can confirm that it is this commit:
changeset: 48840:5e2d2067da48 tip
user:ksrini
date:2018-02-09 13:58 -0800
8194651: javadoc: mark the com.sun.javadoc API for removal
Reviewed-by: jjg
that causes a build failure when rebuilding from scratch.
I bisected my configure flags -
Martin,
I'm not hearing any CI alarm bells ringing here, and I've just completed
a clean build of the latest bits in jdk/jdk repo.
There was a related javac fix that went back a few days ago, from Jan
Lahoda. Is it possible that either you didn't pick up that fix, or that
you have a locally
Martin, Jon,
Yes this one: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194764
When I filed the above bug, I could only reproduce the above only with
langtools/make ant script, this issue never showed up while building the
jdk, because of this
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/5e2d2067da48
This seems to break the build
* For target
buildtools_interim_langtools_modules_jdk.javadoc.interim__the.BUILD_jdk.javadoc.interim_batch:
/home/martin/ws/jdk/src/jdk.javadoc/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javadoc/main/SourcePositionImpl.java:31:
warning: [removal] SourcePosition in com.sun.javadoc ha
OK
-- Jon
On 1/23/18 2:02 PM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote:
Hi,
Please review fix for 8194651,
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194651
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8194651/webrev.01/
Please note this is blocked by: JDK-8194764
Thanks
Kumar
Hi,
Please review fix for 8194651,
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194651
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8194651/webrev.01/
Please note this is blocked by: JDK-8194764
Thanks
Kumar