On Jan 23, 11:45 am, Phil p...@haigh-family.com wrote:
I'm looking for a Java image manipulation library for a web site I'm
currently redeveloping. I suspect my requirements are quite simple
(for the library, which will probably do a lot more than what I want)
but would appreciate any
On Sep 3, 10:15 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot reini...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what makes lombok so different, and that's perhaps why the
lombok discussion group already has more posts in it inside of a month
than kijaro's in its 2 years. You can actually use it, right now, on
your day to day
On Aug 23, 11:39 am, Reinier Zwitserloot reini...@gmail.com wrote:
A full and exhaustive treatise doesn't exist, but there are a few
rules almost everyone can agree with, and yet these rules are not
followed by the JDK, probably because we didn't know any better back
then. i.e.:
[...]
On Aug 21, 4:46 pm, B Smith-Mannschott bsmith.o...@gmail.com wrote:
Checked exceptions *are* a failed experiment.
My first experience and after reading Joel's post I was thinking that
but previous posters convinced me that this is not necessarily true -
but I think there lies some truth also in
On Aug 21, 11:33 am, Peter Becker peter.becker...@gmail.com wrote:
Number one clearly does not apply to checked exceptions, number two
applies to returning values, too. Of course you could assign a value and
follow the approach of having a single return statement at the end, but
I never
On Aug 21, 2:07 pm, Peter Becker peter.becker...@gmail.com wrote:
I take the point that it is possible to make code harder to read using
exceptions in a way that is not possible without. I must admit I didn't
really think it through when I read Joel's blog post.
I think the reduced
Anyone a fan of this: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2003/10/13.html
I am. :-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups The
Java Posse group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Aug 20, 4:13 pm, Casper Bang casper.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Exceptions cater well to OO, you can centralize error handling and
dispatching via
polymorphism as well as associate whatever context that's needed. I
don't think (hope) many in here wants to go back to interpreting
return values.
On 16 Jul., 03:33, Neal Gafter neal.gaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 14, 7:37 am, Martin Wildam mwil...@gmail.com wrote:
I thought again and again about this and my result is: No matter how
often they meet and how many these experts are. There is no
guarantee that they will do a good job
On 16 Jul., 03:33, Neal Gafter neal.gaf...@gmail.com wrote:
But the evidence so far is that Microsoft does a better job with the C#
language than the community does with Java. The benevolent dictator
model does seem to produce better languages.
Your particular opinion in this might have been
On 16 Jul., 12:43, Steven Herod steven.he...@gmail.com wrote:
XML would be the
'modern' equivalent. To do it in a relational database with Java
would involve a lot more work and a lot less flexibility.
I am working in DMS and ECM field and here there is a wave of products
using alternatives
On 11 Jul., 23:53, Martin Wildam mwil...@gmail.com wrote:
on the Microsoft side
it's more top-down. In Redmond, there's an interesting arsenal of
experts (Hejlsberg, Meijer, Hugunin etc.) who have been meeting in a
room 3 days a week for the last decade, who try to find ways for us
As the newcomer I did not make a final decision regarding the web
framework of my choice.
From the distance it seems to me that JSF has somehow the best tools
for building the GUI - at least the NetBeans integration.
Unfortunately I do not hear and see a lot of GUI building tool
integration for
On Jul 9, 2:10 pm, Casper Bang casper.b...@gmail.com wrote:
As already pointed out in this thread, the innovation in the Java
space tends to be more button-up driven while on the Microsoft side
it's more top-down. In Redmond, there's an interesting arsenal of
experts (Hejlsberg, Meijer,
On 8 Jul., 14:08, Michael Kimsal mgkim...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd prefer more people spend their time making decisions about
business-level or application-level issues, rather than language or
framework issues. In the MS world, it *can* be much easier to focus
on those issues regardless of your
...oh, my post was sooo long - sorry guys, but there is much on my
mind. ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups The
Java Posse group.
To post to this group, send email to javaposse@googlegroups.com
To
On 6 Jul., 13:16, kirk kirk.pepperd...@gmail.com wrote:
it is coming in 7.0. Although it's common to want to switch on strings
IMHO its an indication that you want behavior in your strings which is
not String like so using a String isn't what you really want to be
using.
I was used using
In several podcasts the future of the Java language is discussed.
People look at new(er) languages like Scala, Ruby, Groovy etc. And
people argue that the Java language is not moving forward.
I am in software development about 25 years and learned about 12
languages so far. I developed with RAD
Use False for waitForEnd then it should be an asynchroneous launch -
at least for me under Windows (should try at home on Linux ;-) ):
codepublic static int runProcess(String commandLine, boolean
waitForEnd, StringBuilder output)
{
int rc = 0;
boolean b = true;
boolean
Use false for waitForEnd to have an asynchroneous launch:
public static int runProcess(String commandLine, boolean waitForEnd,
StringBuilder output)
{
int rc = 0;
boolean b = true;
boolean r = true;
Process prc = null;
BufferedReader comeIn = null;
20 matches
Mail list logo
