you *are* crying. Look there are really 3 ways to get seriously into
the codebase.
No, I am not. Trust me.
1- Go dig bugs. You can't imagine the number that still come out of the
blue saying bug here, fixed. JBoss is not a magical whole with a
magic formula where TADA you know it all. It
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Number of tests run: 883
Successful tests: 878
Errors:2
Failures: 3
[time of test: 15 August 2002 0:52 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
In my 11 year career I have yet to be on a software project that had
complete, simple, up-to-date documentation on the overall design of the
system. If you're a very talented coder, then you're just being lazy.
Andreas is right, newbies need to show initiative.
-Original Message-
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.3.1_03
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version 1.4.0_01
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Bugs item #595536, was opened at 2002-08-15 16:30
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595536group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Lothar Egger (lviz)
Assigned
Hi Geeks
Just read a post about the attribute names used in the
MEJB. So I was wondering if the fact that attributes in
JBossMX has to start with an uppercase character are
against the JMX spec. or if the spec. requires so.
It is my opinion that MEJB is JMX based and therefore
the uppercase /
Hi Andreas,
JMX1.1 Page 31 StandardMBeans/Lexical Design Patterns/Attributes
If a class definition contains a matching pair of getAttributeName and
setAttributeName methods that take and return the same type, these
methods define a read-write attribute called AttributeName.
This only applies
- Original Message -
From: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [JMX-FORUM] JMX GUI
will try to crosspost this into the jboss-dev, because clue(bax) = 0
bax
- Original Message -
From: Westerfeld, Kurt
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 18:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #595672, was opened at 2002-08-15 18:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=595672group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 8
Submitted By: Boris Tamarkin (upss)
Assigned to:
Number of tests run: 881
Successful tests: 874
Errors:4
Failures: 3
[time of test: 15 August 2002 13:12 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
I think it is odd that you want to recruit new developers with these
negative responses. Getting new talented people to help with a project
might take a bit of sugar to get things moving.
Comments like this, and others which you are prone to, will only make it
harder to find talented
Handerson Ferreira Gomes wrote:
Below is the result that I found, but will be great if someone check
this list.
API J2EE 1.3 JBoss 3.0.1 Project Name
-
JTA 1.0 1.0
Hi,
for obscure reasons I find the meaning of life by integrating a MDB
together with a JMS-Provider-MBean into one ear.
It works fine UNLESS I enable ear-scoping, which is essential for me.
There is a CNFE in the JMSProviderLoader from JBoss, which uses
Class.forName(). I changed this to
Micael,
I started on JBoss about a year and a half ago and there was almost no
usable documentation, so I just read the code. It is very simple and
fairly logical (except mine :) ).
Are you interested in working on some part of the server? If you are,
send me a email and I'll tell you
Class.forName should almost never be used in a framework as this requires
the class loader which loaded the class making the forName call to be able
to
load the requested class. This is too restrictive for a dynamic framework
like
JBoss.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology
Jetty is used to implement JBossWeb.
ok
Look in jbossweb.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml
i've done that, but there's no field to set the bindAddress
this is the config snippet:
Call name=addListener
Arg
New class=org.mortbay.http.SocketListener
Patches item #595451, was opened at 2002-08-15 18:32
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=595451group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Fusayuki Minamoto (minamoto)
ÄúºÃ£¡
ÎÒÃǸºÔðÃÀ¹úÐÔ±ðÑ¡Ôñ¹«Ë¾¡°GENÌ¥¶ùÔÐÇ°Ñ¡Ôñ²úÆ·¡±ÔÚÖйų́Íå¼°´ó½µÄÐû´«Íƹ㡣
×ÔȻѡÔñÉñºÐÊÇÓÉÃÀ¹ú¿Æѧ¼ÒScott
M. Sweazy, M.D.²©Ê¿·ò¸¾·¢Ã÷²¢»ñרÀûȨ£¬ÃÀ¹úÐÔ±ðÑ¡Ôñ¹«Ë¾Éú²úµÄ¸ß¿Æ¼¼²úÆ·¡£°²È«,·½±ã£¬×¼È·Âʸߴï96%¡£
2001ÄêÆðÔÚÅ·ÖÞ¡¢Ó¡¶È¼°±±ÃÀ¶à¸ö¹ú¼ÒµØÇø³É¹¦ÉÏÊУ¬·²Ïì¾Þ´ó¡£
¡¡
26 matches
Mail list logo
