Some documentation about AOP Asynchronous Method Invocation
available on the WIKI.
http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=AOPAsynchronousMethodInvocation
Rgds,Claude
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831238#3831238
Reply to the post :
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Thank you for the tip. I used the CVS version and indeed it solved the problem.
I assume that instead of building it myself I could have used the daily snapshot. Is
this correct?
Thanks,
Avi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831242#3831242
I guess I should have checked before I posted. The daily snapshot is just the source,
not the binary so I would have ended up building it anyway. CVS is better :-)
Avi
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831243#3831243
Reply to the post :
Hi,
I just got a bit further; unfortunately, Xdoclet Generation still doesn't work :-(
I checked out the JBoss-IDE Source Code fom Sourceforge CVS, searched it for
additional_values.xml and copied that file to /resources. Then started again. Got
another problem with a missing
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I have deployed a ear containing a simple servlet under jboss-3.2.3 and get a 404
error. This ear worked fine under jboss-3.2.1 with the jetty servlet container. Are
there any changes I need to make before edploying under jboss-3.2.3.
Thx,
gareth
View the original post :
I have deployed a ear containing a simple servlet under jboss-3.2.3 and get a 404
error. This ear worked fine under jboss-3.2.1 with the jetty servlet container. Are
there any changes I need to make before deploying under jboss-3.2.3.
Thx,
gareth
View the original post :
Until you get -- and I thought you were planning to be one of us? Membership in the
us is low, just send real good code :-)
I'm just trying to be humble and not make any assumptions about anything. I want to
help where I can. Why do you think there aren't that many people in the U.S.? You'd
Add a NonPersistentInterceptor as an example server interceptor.
See the WIKI for more info
http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossMQInterceptorExample
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831261#3831261
Reply to the post :
http://theserverside.com/blogs/showblog.tss?id=SpringVelocityEmail
Did you see this? I think something like that would be killer. E-mail templates should
be very useful. We don't use Spring at work, or Velocity for that matter, but I hate
our sections of code that are like
if (fail) {
// Big
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418101032Lbuild.19
BUILD COMPLETE-build.19Date of build:04/18/2004 10:10:32Time to build:16 minutes 22 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 08:40:07Last log entry:branches: 1.3.2;Include jmx-remoting and jms in the eclipse
Thanks Claude! I will fix your annotation problem soon!
I'm glad you're helping.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831267#3831267
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831267
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418114342
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build:04/18/2004 11:43:42Time to build:19 minutes 53 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 11:27:11Last log
Adrian,
Had a look to JBossMQ code today. Looks like the place to be for the receiver side
would be:
- public SpyMessage receive(...) in BasicQueue
(what about topics?)
For the hashamp, it should be linked to the Destination I assume. What about a Linked
List as value of the hasmap?
I don't
Or BasicQueueParameters maybe could contain the optimization.
What do you think?
Regards,
Stephane
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831272#3831272
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3831272
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418123917Lbuild.20
BUILD COMPLETE-build.20Date of build:04/18/2004 12:39:17Time to build:15 minutes 9 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 12:15:34Last log entry:Example interceptor for setting all message non persistent
1) BasicQueueParameters is where the configuration should go,
setup in org.jboss.mq.server.jmx.Queue
2) It is irrelevent for Topics. If a topic subscription has a selector, messages that
do not match the selector are dropped. BasicQueue (or its subclasses) are used for
both Queues and Topic
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418130821Lbuild.21
BUILD COMPLETE-build.21Date of build:04/18/2004 13:08:21Time to build:16 minutes 42 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 12:40:06Last log entry:Fix the eclipse build
Unit Tests: (0)
If you build it they will come. You'll find that as the project becomes more
functional recruiting will go up. The velocity email templates look okay on the
JavaMail side, but still looks a little ugly if you ask me. Not sure what I prefer.
I'll have to ponder it. Velocity seems ideal for
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418141059Lbuild.22
BUILD COMPLETE-build.22Date of build:04/18/2004 14:10:59Time to build:22 minutes 39 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 13:51:37Last log entry:Repackage jboss-jca.sar as jboss-jca.jar in
If you build it they will come. I agree.
I'll take a second look at it, to see what we might want to do. I don't use Spring or
Velocity currently. A long time ago I used WebMacro, when servlets first came out, but
I haven't used that in ages.
Maybe we need some sort of combined approach, or
spiritualmechanic wrote : I don't really want to use a big nasty XSLT transformation
engine type thing.
You said it! Yuck-eee. Any templating solution should be easy as pie. This should
plug in with mail scripting/matchers/mailets I think. Of course first we really need
mail list support.
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418145347Lbuild.23
BUILD COMPLETE-build.23Date of build:04/18/2004 14:53:47Time to build:21 minutes 7 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 14:40:25Last log entry:Remove these obsolete classes
Unit
Release candidate 1 of Milestone 1 is out. This is our first step on the way to a 1.0
release. I'd like to ask the developers, interested users and anyone listening to
give it a try:
http://jboss.org/wiki/attach?page=MailServicesMilestoneReleases%2Fjboss-mailservices-m1-rc1.zip
As you
Hey Steve. I put a patch page: http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=MailServicesPatches
Send it on through! Remeber the nice and gooey unit tests :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831287#3831287
Reply to the post :
For SMTPSender, there should be a way to handle a retry. Actually I think it should
Except and the retry should be endemic in the RemoteSenderMBean. The default behavior
is 5 tries and then it goes on the dead letter queue (DLQ). We should see about
specfying a specific DLQ for mail services
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I'm testing now, actually. I'm going somewhat methodically through the JBossCX code so
that I can understand it the way I really need to.
You want GUI tests, or gooey tests? :D I'm not sure how long this will take, hopefully
not too long. I need to set up a proper JUnit environment for myself
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
One question:
Do you just use JUnit tests, or do you guys ever use Cactus? The reason I ask is
because JCA needs the container (duh, you know this.)
The *real* reason I ask is because I see in the Mail tests, you have some sort of
TestServer. Is this a common way of doing things, or is this
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040418223604Lbuild.24
BUILD COMPLETE-build.24Date of build:04/18/2004 22:36:04Time to build:16 minutes 12 secondsLast changed:04/18/2004 22:27:42Last log entry:Updated xml file names
Unit Tests: (0)
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419001106Lbuild.25
BUILD COMPLETE-build.25Date of build:04/19/2004 00:11:06Time to build:13 minutes 7 secondsLast changed:04/19/2004 00:01:15Last log entry:Remove another explicit use of log4j
38 matches
Mail list logo
