View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/ejb3-4.0-testsuite?log=log20060203031650
BUILD TIMED OUTAnt Error Message:build timeoutDate of build:02/03/2006 03:16:50Time to build:Last changed:12/31/2005 16:46:08Last log entry:call isOpen() when obtaining session so that HEM
I've noticed2 webservices tests that timeout (and
fail) occasionally at 60 secondswhen contactingexternal
webservices:
org.jboss.test.jbossnet.external.ExternalUnitTestCase
org.jboss.test.jbossnet.external.RedeployExternalUnitTestCase
Is this timeout configurable? I seem to be getting a
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 13:43, Scott M Stark wrote:
This will help get us finalized on a mc and start thinking about the
proper abstractions to use it so I'm all for it.
1) Some have been inquiring about whether spring integration setups can
also be used. Possibly we could have a spring alias
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-compatibility-matrix?log=log20060203071959
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:235: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-compatibility-matrix?log=log20060203103401Lbuild.1
BUILD COMPLETE-build.1Date of build:02/03/2006 10:34:01Time to build:23 minutes 36 secondsLast changed:02/03/2006 09:44:06Last log entry:extend
This is JBAS 4.03SP1/last nights EJB3 and HSQL as distributed
If I do this:
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.SEQUENCE)
long id;
works with hypersonic
however
@Id @GeneratedValue(strategy=GenerationType.AUTO)
long id;
yields lovelies like this:
My MDB tests seem to be hanging, Can't figure out why. I do a thread
dump and got the following... Any clues? Did somebody recently change
JMS on Branch_4_0?
Thanks
RMI TCP Connection(2)-192.168.0.2 daemon prio=5 tid=0x27bbdcf0
nid=0xc78 runnable [0x285fc000..0x285ffd68]
at
So I have to introduce a proxy for a javax.net.SSLServerSocket
which is an abstract class and so have to use cglib or javassist. I see some
proxy working in the head javassist, but this is not in the 4.0 branch version.
We also dont bundle javassist with 4.0 currently. I assume we would
Yeah, something is up with Branch_4_0 with JMS. Works find with
4.0.3SP1 (same EJB3 code).
Bill Burke wrote:
My MDB tests seem to be hanging, Can't figure out why. I do a thread
dump and got the following... Any clues? Did somebody recently change
JMS on Branch_4_0?
Thanks
RMI TCP
I should probably elaborate.
It hangs at deploy time. Server is spinning too (max CPU).
Bill Burke wrote:
Yeah, something is up with Branch_4_0 with JMS. Works find with
4.0.3SP1 (same EJB3 code).
Bill Burke wrote:
My MDB tests seem to be hanging, Can't figure out why. I do a thread
I have also seen these fail occasionally with
503, bad gateway errors.
From: Dimitris
Andreadis
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006
5:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Thomas Diesler
Subject: WebService tests timeout
I've noticed2
Dev,Just a reminder, as I keep getting asked how to subscribe to the svn commit email list, here's the link to the SF page to subscribe:https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-svn-commitsSincerely,Damon --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] JBoss Labs Lead 214-883-6733 36FD 368C 38E4 2DA2 6E2C
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060203190902Lbuild.214
BUILD COMPLETE-build.214Date of build:02/03/2006 19:09:02Time to build:49 minutes 13 secondsLast changed:02/03/2006 09:44:06Last log entry:extend copyright
I am all for this, cglib sucks
-Jason
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006
1:47 PM
To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs
javassit for proxies
So I have to
I should clarify, for WS, we just need plain
javabean generation. So I can add that to our list of things to do. BTW I was
too harsh, there are nice things about cglib. I just ran into a lot of bugs.
-Jason
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Javassist is pretty good, problem is that it doesn't have a junit testsuite.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
I should clarify, for WS, we just need plain javabean generation. So I
can add that to our list of things to do. BTW I was too harsh, there are
nice things about cglib. I just ran into a lot of
Let me expand on this. When deploying an MDB3, it just hangs on
deployment. Thread dump shows this.
Same EJB 3.0 code (same dist). MDB runs fine on 4.0.3SP1. I also see
that the MDB EJB3 tests are passing in HEAD as well from nightly build
from like 5 hours ago. I haven't gotten a
I sent this to a number of other lists, but forgot this one. Apologies.
I actually just today checked in a pluggable bytecode API into
Hibernate. Hibernate does now support either CGLIB or Javassist for all
bytecode services.
As an aside, our experience with CGLIB has been very good. Juozas
JMSDestinationManager had typo. it should be a null check instead of a
!= null check. Typo from backmerge. I guess if you put down the code
for awhile you see it!
/**
* Gets the ID attribute of the JMSServer object
*
* @return The ID value
*/
public String getID()
You'll find that Javassist gives you a lot more flexibilty as it has a
built in javacompiler and can replace code for you. With Javassist it
should be really easy to intercept field access for the EJB 3.0
requirements.
Steve Ebersole wrote:
I sent this to a number of other lists, but forgot
Define replace code for you... You mean as in replace the class def
*in the classloader*?
Currently field interception (using either) is only
implemented/available via build task.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Friday,
21 matches
Mail list logo
