Hi all,
the tomcat version in both HEAD as well as Branch_4_0 has been
upgraded to v5.5.17.
A minor issue during the upgrade has been documented here:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=81231
Please test and report back the issues.
Regards,
Anil
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060417020317
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:224: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-hsqldb-testsuite?log=log20060417021210
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:85: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.4?log=log20060417021604
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-oracle-testsuite?log=log20060417022925
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:100: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-mysql-testsuite?log=log20060417032619
BUILD TIMED OUTAnt Error Message:build timeoutDate of build:04/17/2006 03:26:19Time to build:Last changed:04/15/2006 07:30:48Last log entry:added deployment targets for EAR; merged Tom's
Some of the problems we have now with our JIRA case handling are:
- entered cases often have no component assigned, thus nobody looks at
them
- cases with a component are not qualified at all; we have cases that
date back to the sourceforge days
- cases having more than one assigned components
Anybody else getting tired of all the recent build breakages?
BUILD FAILED
/home/ejort/jboss-head/build/build-thirdparty.xml:135: A versioning
problem exists:
Component: apache-tomcat is at version: 5.5.17
but it is also required to be compatible with:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], version=5.5.16}]
by:
It doesn't even build.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 01:11 -0500, Anil Saldhana wrote:
Hi all,
the tomcat version in both HEAD as well as Branch_4_0 has been
upgraded to v5.5.17.
A minor issue during the upgrade has been documented here:
*gives adrian a big hug and kiss*
:-*
Next thing you'll be wanting me to try compiling things first before I
check them in... sheesh.
Adrian Brock wrote:
Congratulations on:
1) Not discussing this change before implementing it.
2) Raising a JIRA task to document it.
3) Porting it to
I am available for this although Ryan is at a training this week.
We'll be using the RD conf call number?
Ruel Loehr
JBoss QA
-
512-342-7840 ext 2011
Yahoo: ruelloehr
Skype: ruelloehr
AOL: dokoruel
-Original Message-
From: Damon Sicore
Sent: Friday, April
So I tried to fix this 1 hour 30 minutes ago.
But my change still hasn't shown up in repository.jboss.com?
Nor does it appear in anonymous cvs yet.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 13:54 +0100, Adrian Brock wrote:
It doesn't even build.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 01:11 -0500, Anil Saldhana wrote:
Hi all,
It should resync every 15 minutes. I'll take a look and see why it
isn't.
Ruel Loehr
JBoss QA
-
512-342-7840 ext 2011
Yahoo: ruelloehr
Skype: ruelloehr
AOL: dokoruel
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Brock
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 9:32 AM
To:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact discuss it and no one said much in reply. Perhaps if
you'd read the forum posts more closely, I would not have to repeat
myself here.
/parody
So if it is needed for 5.0 I'll port it there. I think it might be
useful for that profile service thingy. If
It is redundant.
You could always do this by naming your file
something the URLDeploymentScanner ignored then
renaming it.
Rename is an atomic operation on any filesystem.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact discuss it and no one said
And you were ignored because there must be at least 100
previous threads where it was already discussed.
Including me telling describing how to do it to somebody
who never contributed it back.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact discuss
It's due to the anoncvs sysnc problem. The repository is being updated
from anoncvs..
I opened up a ticket with IT:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIT-926
And also spoke with Eric, he is going to have TomBen take a look.
Ruel Loehr
JBoss QA
-Original Message-
From: Adrian
This is the beginning of the discussion!
So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need
add/remove/change?
I completely agree with all of those. Have you started
the discussion on the components leads yet? If not, let's
get that discussion started. I think that is the
From build/build-thirdparty.xml, the versions that are registered for
jbossws to be pulled from the repository are:
componentref name=jboss/jbossws version=1.0.0.CR6/
componentref name=jboss/jbossws14 version=1.0.0.CR6/
It is the repo sync that has failed.
Also can we reduce the repo sync
JCA == Weston Price
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 09:55 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
This is the beginning of the discussion!
So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need
add/remove/change?
I completely agree with all of those. Have you started
the discussion on the
Oh cool. Can you repost those threads here? I must have missed them.
Adrian Brock wrote:
And you were ignored because there must be at least 100
previous threads where it was already discussed.
Including me telling describing how to do it to somebody
who never contributed it back.
On Mon,
yucky.
Adrian Brock wrote:
It is redundant.
You could always do this by naming your file
something the URLDeploymentScanner ignored then
renaming it.
Rename is an atomic operation on any filesystem.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 10:44 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
BTW Adrian,
parody
I did in fact
Just use this link :-)
www.adriansmemorysearch.org?type=LongTermRetrievalquery=URLDeploymentScanner+Forum+Posts
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:03 -0400, Andrew Oliver wrote:
Oh cool. Can you repost those threads here? I must have missed them.
Adrian Brock wrote:
And you were ignored because
Looks like it is fixed now, thanks.
On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 09:52 -0500, Ruel Loehr wrote:
It's due to the anoncvs sysnc problem. The repository is being updated
from anoncvs..
I opened up a ticket with IT:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIT-926
And also spoke with Eric, he is
IT did a manual sync for us. Things should be back to a buildable
state.
They are working on getting the automated sync up and running.
Ruel Loehr
JBoss QA
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Brock
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 10:34 AM
To: Ruel Loehr
Cc: Adrian Brock;
Some possibilities also:
Could be changed:
Build System == Ruel Loehr
Clustering == Brian Stansberry
JBossCache == Manik Surtani
IIOP = Franscisco Reverbel
Could be added:
ClassLoaders = Scott Stark
EJB3 = Bill Burke
EJB Timers == Dimitris Andreadis
Scott owns also the following components,
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060417121218
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060417143216
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line:
The main issue for improving progress is a more uniform application of
resources. If every lead is responsible for getting 1-2 production
release issues resolved per week, we would have a better progression to
a release as well as better understanding of what issues should be
delayed due to
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2937
run.conf
JAVA_OPTS=-server -Xms128m -Xmx128m
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.client.gcInterval=360
-Dsun.rmi.dgc.server.gcInterval=360
run.bat
set JAVA_OPTS=%JAVA_OPTS% -Xms128m -Xmx512m
---
Any particular reason we don't need the rmi gc
I don't know what Manik thinks about this, but since JBossCache is a
separate project, I'm inclined to have it removed it from the AS
component list. Discourage people reporting issues against the wrong
project. If they have issues with JBC integration in the AS, the
Clustering component should
Yes, use the rd conf call #.
-Original Message-
From: Ruel Loehr
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:15 AM
To: Damon Sicore; jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: QA
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Need a head svn/migration death march list
I am available for this although Ryan is at
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060417173658Lbuild.1673
BUILD COMPLETE-build.1673Date of build:04/17/2006 17:36:58Time to build:22 minutes 34 secondsLast changed:04/17/2006 17:24:30Last log entry:JBAS-3112,
So the resolution is we upgrade to cglib 2.1.3 (if that works) and
hibernate is the only component using it?
I see 3 related tasks:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3101
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-2642
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-3061
-Original
it works on Branch_4_0 though. What changed?
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Inc.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060417231525
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060418005352
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:235: The following error occurred while executing this line:
37 matches
Mail list logo
