Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-04 Thread Bill Burke
: Friday, February 03, 2006 9:04 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies You'll find that Javassist gives you a lot more flexibilty as it has a built in javacompiler and can replace code for you. With Javassist it should be really

[JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Scott M Stark
So I have to introduce a proxy for a javax.net.SSLServerSocket which is an abstract class and so have to use cglib or javassist. I see some proxy working in the head javassist, but this is not in the 4.0 branch version. We also dont bundle javassist with 4.0 currently. I assume we would

RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Jason T. Greene
I am all for this, cglib sucks -Jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 1:47 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies So I have

RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Jason T. Greene
Of Jason T. Greene Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 7:56 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies I am all for this, cglib sucks -Jason From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark Sent: Friday

Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Bill Burke
-development@lists.sourceforge.net *Subject:* [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies So I have to introduce a proxy for a javax.net.SSLServerSocket which is an abstract class and so have to use cglib or javassist. I see some proxy working in the head javassist, but this is not in the 4.0 branch

RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Steve Ebersole
: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies Javassist is pretty good, problem is that it doesn't have a junit testsuite. Jason T. Greene wrote: I should clarify, for WS, we just need plain javabean generation. So I can add that to our list of things to do. BTW I was too harsh, there are nice

Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Bill Burke
the option to not have to bundle yet another jar. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Burke Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 8:39 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies Javassist

RE: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies

2006-02-03 Thread Steve Ebersole
, February 03, 2006 9:04 PM To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] cglib vs javassit for proxies You'll find that Javassist gives you a lot more flexibilty as it has a built in javacompiler and can replace code for you. With Javassist it should be really easy