] ANNOUNCE:
BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
Scott,
Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0?
Cheers,
Sacha
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld
:48 PM
Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re:
[JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
Scott,
Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0?
Cheers,
Sacha
If something like this could also be added to J2EE deployments(in META-INF
dirs), then I'd be even more excited.
Well, have you simply tried to put a xxx.bsh file inside your JAR, SAR or
EAR (not war though): it should deploy thanks to the russian dolls
packaging feature.
James Higginbotham writes:
I wonder if it would be possible to put the .bsh in a .sar in your
.ear?
Sounds excruciating :-). Won't it tickle?
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =
List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE:
BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
If something like this could also be added to J2EE
deployments(in META-INF
dirs), then I'd be even more excited
PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE:
BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
OK, I've just tested and the russian doll feature wasn't
working with .bsh
files. It is now fixed
