Maplesden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: JBossDev (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
No I haven't and I see now what you mean, I didn't read what you put
carefully enough. Still you might be able to do it this way, IIRC
: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:02 PM
To: David Maplesden; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
David Maplesden wrote:
1) worked fine for me...
Have you tried it on different architectures?
My concern is that if I do
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this whole issue about
distributing
a compiler with JBoss so the user doesn't have to download the JDK and
edit
amen
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:51 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
|
|
|Jikes is not a Java program and you have to use
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
Jikes is not a Java program and you have to use a binary suitable for
the target platform. I'm not interested in getting into supporting mutiple
platform binaries.
Well, I guess now is as good a time as any to bring up a problem I have with
the
it.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar
started app. I use this one a lot.
Ignacio.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de
Andreas Schaefer
Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de noviembre de 2001 16:46
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac
de noviembre de 2001 19:38
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
You might be jumping the gun a bit with this one. tools.jar is
only needed
afaik for Jasper i.e. when Jetty (or Tomcat) needs to serve jsp
pages. Not
everyone will want this, indeed many
yeah sounds good, add it if you can find it, if you can't print a warning
and carry on
-Original Message-
From: Ignacio Coloma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
How about
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David Maplesden wrote:
You might be jumping the gun a bit with this one. tools.jar is only needed
afaik for Jasper i.e. when Jetty (or Tomcat) needs to serve jsp pages. Not
everyone will want this, indeed many people will probably run JBoss without
a servlet engine,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
2.4.x is based on the archaic and fragmented build policy from the
early days of JBoss and its not likely to change(at least by me).
The build process has been totally reorganized in the main branch for the
3.0 release so focus on getting a source
Next week.
- Original Message -
From: Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
2.4.x is based
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
Next week.
Ooh! I can't wait.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Can we automate .deb building with the new build system?
--jason
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
2.4.x is based on the archaic and fragmented build policy from the
early days of JBoss and its not likely to change(at least by me).
The
yOn Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Jason Dillon wrote:
Can we automate .deb building with the new build system?
Possibly. The whole point of debian is automation. We have lots of build
daemons setup(for all the architectures we support), that demand this sort of
feature.
I have just checked out the cvs
We are not planning on re-adding tools.jar to the package are we?
Perhaps we could setup an InstallAnywhere installer which could have some
custom tasks to install a tools.jar from the target JDK for those users who
might have trouble doing this by hand.
--jason
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Adam
14, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
We are not planning on re-adding tools.jar to the package are we?
Perhaps we could setup an InstallAnywhere installer which could have some
custom tasks to install a tools.jar from the target JDK for those users
who
might
1) worked fine for me...
-Original Message-
From: Julian Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
Jasper requires tools.jar to be available to it.
Should I:
1. copy
; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
David Maplesden wrote:
1) worked fine for me...
Have you tried it on different architectures?
My concern is that if I do the build on Linux, the tools.jar
from my 1.3.1
distrib may not work
]
To: JBossDev (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
No I haven't and I see now what you mean, I didn't read what you put
carefully enough. Still you might be able to do it this way, IIRC we used
to distribute javac
20 matches
Mail list logo
