Re: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD

2003-01-09 Thread Scott M Stark
Message - From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 11:48 PM Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev

RE: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD

2003-01-09 Thread Sacha Labourey
:48 PM Subject: Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD Scott, Do you accept the beanshell sub-deployer in pre-HEAD branches? 3.2? 3.0? Cheers, Sacha

RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD

2003-01-08 Thread Sacha Labourey
List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote: If something like this could also be added to J2EE deployments(in META-INF dirs), then I'd be even more excited

Scott? RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD

2003-01-08 Thread Sacha Labourey
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: [JBoss-user] RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBoss sub-deployer in HEAD On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote: OK, I've just tested and the russian doll feature wasn't working with .bsh files. It is now fixed