Dain,
What is going on with MBean persistence?
Not much, as far as I can tell.
Can we do this today?
Yes, but only by persisting to ObjectOutputStream files. XML / JDBC persistence
engines have yet to be written.
If not is anyone working on it?
I origionally wrote
So Matt are you interested in working on the XML persistence?
-dain
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 08:32 AM, Matt Munz wrote:
Dain,
What is going on with MBean persistence?
Not much, as far as I can tell.
Can we do this today?
Yes, but only by persisting to ObjectOutputStream files.
-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
So Matt are you interested in working on the XML persistence
Title: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Matt,
I
think we want seemless integration here. If the MBean is packaged within a
SAR, the SAR should be exploded, the XML file modified and the SAR
re-jared. Same goes withstraight XML files or SARS embedded
withinSARs (russian doll).
I'm
: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Dain,
So Matt are you interested in working on the XML persistence?
Yeah, I suppose I could put some more time into it. It sounds like
you know a few people that might actually be users
/2003 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
So Matt are you interested in working on the XML
!
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Yes basically
Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Matt,
I think we want seemless integration here. If the MBean is packaged
within a SAR, the SAR should be exploded, the XML file modified and
the SAR re-jared. Same goes with straight
Title: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Like
Matt, I have concerns about modifying the files in the deployment as well. I
think his concerns about division of roles are valid - I'd go further and say
this needs to be able to handle a split between 'deployer' and 'operator/sys
admin
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 11:26 AM, Matt Munz wrote:
Dain,
Please see my recent email in response to Bill.
Yes. I think sf is creating a big lag between our emails.
I origionally started with this approach, but the more I thought
about it, the more untenable it seemed. Based on
Simpler console for common tasks
The administrator the power of the JMX console, and think it is cool
they can change the behavior of the entire system. On the other hand
they are overwhelmed by the options. Most would like a very simple
static interface
I love you sacha!
I can't seem to find the screen shot. I'll see if I can get this
working on my apple.
-dain
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 11:39 AM, Sacha Labourey wrote:
Simpler console for common tasks
The administrator the power of the JMX console, and
de Dain
Sundstrom
Envoye : lundi, 13 janvier 2003 18:51
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
I love you sacha!
I can't seem to find the screen shot. I'll see if I can get this
working on my apple.
-dain
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 11:39 AM, Sacha
Jeremy,
Specific comments are inline...
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 11:33 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Like Matt, I have concerns about modifying the files in the deployment
as well. I think his concerns about division of roles are valid - I'd
go further and say this needs to be able to
Our admin here thinks that Dain is spot on with this analysis.
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 11:27:07 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Matt,
I have meet with many system administrators
generate
a use case that shows why two files is worse than one...
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 01:26 PM, Matt Munz wrote:
Dain,
First off, thank you for providing much-needed field data for this
work.
Your comments on Persistence in general are identical to my reasons
for working on MBean Persistence in the first place.
When I suggest that we could
Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 1/13/2003 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 01:26 PM, Matt Munz wrote
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
...
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL
/13/2003 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
This should not be a black and white option. We need a logical seperation from
configuration from the deployment at the JBoss core layer
-
From: Matt Munz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 2:38 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Scott,
Thanks. I think the common point to both strategies is the MBean - XML serializer.
I'll get started on that.
For what date is the 3.2 release
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
Matt, please don't rush this into 3.2 I think the 3.x series should be frozen for
funtionality except in the case of a paying
customer. We should start pushing for 4.0
What if changes to the DeploymentScanner was made to reflect :
file - DeploymentScanner - Mbean
jmx-console - DeploymentScanner - Mbean and file
Then adding writes inside russian dolls could/should also revolve
around the DeploymentScanner as hub.
-dev] MBean persistence?
...
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http
- Original Message -
From: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:22 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MBean persistence?
I'm not sure if you agree with my proposal or not. Do you think we
should add the feature to persist the changes
lördagen den 11 januari 2003 kl 19.42 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
anyone working on it? When do you expect to
In some sidesteps projects here ... it is easy when hsqldb is up ... or
in a grid ... when one master is up to have configurations federated.
26 matches
Mail list logo
