Hi.
Could someone with write-acces review and apply the following patch ?
Cheers,
Jesper
--
Jesper Pedersen, M.Sc. C.S.E
Open Source Solution Manager
Sun Certified Java 2 Developer
IT+ A/S Phone: +45 86 78 21 00
Brendstrupgaardsvej 7 Fax: +45 86 78 21 02
DK-8200 Aarhus N
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: 13 June 2001 22:26
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Commit Messages was [RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update:
> jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb CacheKey.java]
>
>
> also add yourself as au
HI all, Scott,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:39:17 -0700, Scott M Stark wrote:
>Its something on my todo list. I'm thinking of adding the DTD validation
>to the bean verifier step of deployment.
Maybe need a help?
I have modified XmlFileLoader.java and in my enviroment it works fine and I found a
lo
Hi.
Someone with write-access: please review and commit this patch for javax.sql
in the jboss-j2ee module.
Changelog: Added Javadoc to javax.sql
Cheers,
Jesper
--
Jesper Pedersen, M.Sc. C.S.E
Open Source Solution Manager
Sun Certified Java 2 Developer
IT+ A/S Phone: +45 86
> I think we should create a small developer guidelines containing infos like:
> - logging changes
> - writting/updating JavaDoc
> - writting/updating Manuals
> - other guidelines but I would suggest to keep them really simple
>
> Mad Andy
I think an excellent addition to that list would be
Bugs item #433081, was updated on 2001-06-14 05:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=433081&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v2.2.1 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to
Hi,
> Could someone with write-acces review and
> apply the following patch ?
Why to call String.toLowercase() 4 times?
I think following is better:
public boolean accept(File dir, String filename)
{
String lowercaseFilename = filename.toLowerCase();
return
lowerca
On Thursday 14 June 2001 14:20, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Could someone with write-acces review and
> > apply the following patch ?
>
> Why to call String.toLowercase() 4 times?
> I think following is better:
>
>public boolean accept(File dir, String filename)
>{
> String lowercaseFil
User: juhalindfors
Date: 01/06/14 06:33:33
Modified:src/main/org/jbossmq/selectors Selector.java
Log:
Fixed my own poo-poo. The JMS CorrelationID was incorrectly being stuffed
into an Integer object.
Bug #433081: Selector on string CorellationID fails
Submitted and patched
Change Notes item #433104, was updated on 2001-06-14 06:40
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=433104&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Juha Lindfors (juhalindfors)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
SoI'll check this stuff in??
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind
>
>
> |I'll answer the bel
Hi,
please submit patches to the SF patch tracker.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=22866
-- Juha
At 10:15 14.6.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi.
>
>Could someone with write-acces review and apply the following patch ?
>
>Cheers,
>
> Jesper
>
>--
>Jesper Pedersen, M.Sc. C.S.E
>Open Source
Bugs item #433115, was updated on 2001-06-14 07:09
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=433115&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned to: Bill
Hello,
Had sometime
to review the rowid based update code and was wondering whether or not to
do a code change for handling updates which happen in the same transaction
as the insert. Here is what I found:
1. I have a Session Bean fronting an Entity Bean.
The methods in the Session
>From our sys admin, Ed Marshall, not sure if it works or not, :-)
Requirements: 2.4.x kernel (for distributions, Red Hat 7.1, SuSE 7.1, and I
*think* Mandrake 8.0 should satisfy this) and the "iptables"
command.
The following is the magic command line:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p
Vinay,
you're still sending HTML :(
-- Juha
At 15:24 14.6.2001 +0100, you wrote:
> Hello,a code change for handling updates which happen in the
>sam
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>e trsaction ashe insert. Here is what
>Iound:
>
>
>1.
>I
>he
>a
>Session
>Bean fronting an Entity Bean.
>The
>methods
Hello,
Had sometime to review the rowid based update code and was wondering
whether or not to do a code change for handling updates which happen in the
same transaction as the insert. Here is what I found:
1. I have a Session Bean fronting an Entity Bean. The methods in the Session
bean is
Damn,
i had set it to plain text. Sorry jbossers!
Vinay
PS: Marc pls don't send me a stinker!
- Original Message -
From: "Juha Lindfors" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ROWID Based Update: Load Entity Before
|I understand the problem you have with CVS and access to history info while
|offline and, perhaps because I rarely have a need for that info, I honestly
|don't have a solution for it.
In fact it is scott that put the best finger on the problem with CVS
1- the comments are usually blanket comment
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 08:16:18
Removed: pictures cvs_structure.png
Log:
Remove non-binary image
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 08:17:04
Added: pictures cvs_structure.png
Log:
Re-add the cvs structure image as a binary
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2 newsite/pictures/cvs_structure.png
<>
___
Jb
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:55 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind
|
|
|SoI'll check this stuff in??
Yes, with the understanding that i
Ok, I'll check out your changes and check the jboss.dtd syntax.
- Original Message -
From: "Darius Davidavicius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:59 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ejb-jar.xml DTD checking during deployment
> HI all, Scott,
>
> O
If someone with write access to the web pages would just throw together a
form on the web page where you could fill in information that You need I'm
sure there will be quite a lot of info coming in. Right now all that is said
is "please email us with your name, job title, company and a brief
descr
James Cook wrote:
>>Really cool stuff! This can be easily implemented in CMP/JAWS since JAWS
>>keeps the old state alive.
>>
>>
> Bill,
>
> Before digging into source, can you answer these questions? We have a need
> to identify which fields have changed in our state objects for an audit
> trail
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James
> Cook
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 9:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Audit Trail Support
>
>
> > Really cool stuff! This can be easily implemented in CMP/JAWS since JAWS
|If someone with write access to the web pages would just throw together a
|form on the web page where you could fill in information that You need I'm
|sure there will be quite a lot of info coming in. Right now all
|that is said
|is "please email us with your name, job title, company and a brief
Why the decision to remove apache and serve everything from tomcat?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss o
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind
>
>
>
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
|Walters
|Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:05 PM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
|
|
|Why the decision to remove apache and serve everything from tomcat?
|
|Cheers
|
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 09:48:31
Removed: business doco.html
Log:
conflict on updated files, removing it with chirurgical procedure
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jbo
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 09:51:02
Removed: business Updating-Webstore-to-Jboss2.htm binary.html
business.html changelog_2_2_1.html
changelog_2_2_2.html contrib.html corp.html
cvs.html dot_empty.gif dot_filled.g
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 09:53:13
Removed: developers Updating-Webstore-to-Jboss2.htm binary.html
cvs.html developers.html doco.html dot_empty.gif
dot_filled.gif faq.html general.scripts.js
indextest.html jboss
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:27:34
Added: .faq.jsp
Log:
faq file
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/faq.jsp
Index: faq.jsp
===
What a question !
How do you want to convince other people to use JBoss when
you aren't going to use your own tool. Either JBoss is
ready to be used in production and then we should use it.
BTW We are going to create an interactive Survey which
must store the info in a DB.
Mad Andy
> -Orig
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:36:00
Added: documentation main.css
Log:
style
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/documentation/main.css
Index: main.css
===
/* Style Sheet document
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:38:31
Added: pictures Thumbs.db
Log:
the new files being added some html some pictures
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/pictures/Thumbs.db
<>
___
Jboss-devel
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:34:51
Added: documentation TEMPLATE.jsp head.jsp migration.jsp
navigation.jsp slogan.jsp
Log:
The jsp for the documentation stuff, also I ported the faq.jsp to give an example on
how to use it
Revision ChangesPath
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:42:50
Removed: .index.html
Log:
Removed old files
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:42:50
Removed: documentation Jaws.htm migration.html
Log:
Removed old files
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:43:58
Removed: .index2.htm
Log:
removal
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: mnf999
Date: 01/06/14 10:45:27
Removed: common allFile.html
Log:
removing
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|Yeah, double serialization, but isn't keeping an isUpdated table just
|overkill and a pain in the ass? Maybe not I guess, set the flag
|to true for
|each entity after you do the finder synch. Set it to false after every
|method invocation that could possibly change the state of the entity.
|You'
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind
>
>
> |Yeah, double serialization, but isn't keeping an isUpdated t
>
> u that I really don't agree with, that database
> guys can see the change
> outside the commit within the same transaction seems
> kind of funky to me...
> but it is in the spec so...
>
I have been working with databases for a long time,
and particularly with Oracle, I am not aware that
|I have been working with databases for a long time,
|and particularly with Oracle, I am not aware that this
|can happen, whether in transaction or not, before
|commit, nobody can see the updated table period in the
|database..
well that is my point precisely, it seems to imply that the updates "
That's BS. Sure you can! If you do a query within the same transaction(or
is it connection...same thing?)!! And yes, even in Oracle. Go try it out in
a simple SQL*Plus window.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gina
> Hagg
> Sen
Hi,
I probably won't find much time for helping
out with this, though it is a most interesting
project.
marc fleury wrote:
> ah yes then it is much more complicated since we need to have ANY client
> calling our stuff.
Yes, a simple encapsulation of the method
invocation over IIOP is quick, but
|But if possible, we should try not to depend
|on any particular CORBA implementation.
|
|Maybe one day we will even generate stubs and
|skeletons for IIOP on-the-fly, like Rickard
|did with dynamic proxies for the JRMP transport.
|However I would wait with that, even if it means
|that an external
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind
>
>
> |I have been working with databases for a long time,
> |and
honestly?
I don't really care...
but if that is your thing, and it works, and it is spec compliant, then it
is definitely ok by me... :)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:50 PM
|To: [E
Hi,
Hey guys, think a minute. What transaction isolation means is _other_
transactions can't see your work until you commit. Of course _your_
transaction can see everything you've done. If you're working with say the
oracle interactive interface and insert a record in a table, if you query
the
ok... sounds good...
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 5:05 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] No storeEntity before ejbFind
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Hey guys, think a minute. What
I was doing some thinking on an IIOP invoker a while back. I would have
spoken up before now, but I've got plenty to do with JAWS. (more below)
Ole Husgaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I probably won't find much time for helping
> out with this, though it is a most interesting
> project.
>
> marc fleury
Hey,
Sacha , Scott and others lets organize about writing doco for dynamic
classloading fix introduced lately. I guess there should be some test
stuff in Junit test and doco introducing dynamic classloading with
examples. I have time from now on, lets organize, how should we split this
work?
T
aaron...
come on man...
we all know ejx is an unfinished work... like every thing else the kid
does...
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 7:03 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject:
Bugs item #433264, was updated on 2001-06-14 16:02
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=433264&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.2.2 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Aaron Mulder (ammulder)
Assigned to: Nob
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 16:42:21
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/metadata XmlFileLoader.java
Log:
Integrated Darius Davidavicius changes to support DTD validation.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +257 -79 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/metadata/XmlFileLoader.java
Index
Hi Vinay,
> This basically means that even within the same transaction the
> rowid will be updated if the client attempts to do an update
> [or delete].
> Do we now need to check for rowid being null and falling back
> to the primary key if it is not? I had written some code for
> this and w
Bill wrote:
> Can XSLT handle the finder where-clauses for WebLogic DDs? They are
> somewhat different.
Well, to be perfectly honest, I'm currently auto-generating both WL and
JBoss DDs from one common bean-descriptor (and ended up writing
a little Polish notation converter to handle the WL que
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 16:57:13
Modified:src/resources/security/META-INF ejb-jar-proxy.xml
ejb-jar.xml
Log:
Update DOCTYPE to use ejb-jar_2_0.dtd
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +3 -2 jbosstest/src/resources/security/META-INF/ejb-jar-pr
I added support for validation the ejb-jar and jboss dtds and updated the
ejb-jar_2_0.dtd and added local resolution support for it. The 2.0 DOCTYPE
declaration is:
http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd";>
To enable the reporting of dtd errors set the ValidateDTDs ContainerFactory
service mbe
Is Monday still a good 2.4 freeze date for the features that will go into
the 2.4 release or is more time needed?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Change Notes item #433273, was updated on 2001-06-14 16:53
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=433273&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Scott M Stark (starksm)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Aaron
> Mulder
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 7:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-433264 ] EJX Writes Invalid
> jaws.xml
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, marc fleury wro
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 16:45:17
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment Installer.java
Log:
Updated XmlFileLoader usage.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +8 -4 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/Installer.java
Index: Installer.java
==
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 16:44:31
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb ContainerFactory.java
ContainerFactoryMBean.java
Log:
Added support for validating j2ee descriptor DTDs
Revision ChangesPath
1.76 +27 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/C
User: starksm
Date: 01/06/14 16:39:09
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss.jcml
Log:
Added ValidateDTDs attribute to the ContainerFactory mbean config
Revision ChangesPath
1.39 +1 -0 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/jboss.jcml
Index: jboss.jcml
===
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> aaron...
>
> come on man...
>
>
> we all know ejx is an unfinished work... like every thing else the kid
> does...
Well, you might want to finish it by the time my book comes out...
:)
I thought there was a grand effort to unify the metada
I fail to see how serving .gif files from tomcat shows off jboss. i am all
for using jboss to handle dynamic content on the site, just trying to figure
out why every hit has to go there. Is that how you expect people to use it
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Schaefer, Andreas
To: '[EM
For those trying to implement the latest 2.0 features there is a new
beta release of the EE SDK that may help.
http://www.javasoft.com/j2ee/j2sdkee-beta/index.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/list
Hi
I am using EJBDoclet and this very fine. No hasle with descriptors nor
creating Home/Remote interfaces. Just go to sourceforge and look up
EJBDoclet.
BTW Now release 1.0 is out with a completely reworked interface.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Aaron Mulder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/14 19:24:44
Modified:src/lib jboss-client.jar
Log:
API change to jboss-client.jar class CacheKey broke the build
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +157 -160 jbosstest/src/lib/jboss-client.jar
<>
___
Hi,
Will JBoss 3.0 support ejb 2.0 CMR spec?
And what is the target specs of JBoss 3.0 trying to reach besides the "web
deployment"?
Regards,
Henri Chen
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinf
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/14 20:37:29
Added: src/main/org/jboss/ejb TxEntityMap.java
Log:
With this class, you can find out the entities that are associated with a given
transaction.
Each EntityContainer contains an instance of this class.
EntitySynchronizationIntercept
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/14 20:41:07
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EntityContainer.java
Log:
Added an instance of TxEntityMap so that interested parties can find out
what entities are associated with a given transaction.
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor and InstanceS
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/14 20:42:29
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java
Log:
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor and InstanceSynchronization now implement
store before find. see below.
The EJB spec 2.0 rea
Change Notes item #433314, was updated on 2001-06-14 20:47
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=433314&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (no
User: patriot1burke
Date: 01/06/14 20:50:33
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java
Log:
Forgot to add myself as an author.
Revision ChangesPath
1.37 +2 -1
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/Entit
Patches item #433345, was updated on 2001-06-15 00:07
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=433345&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jesper Pedersen (jews)
Assigned to: Nobod
Patches item #433350, was updated on 2001-06-15 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=433350&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jesper Pedersen (jews)
Assigned to: Nobod
Hi,
IMHO, the re-deployment problem (see below) should stop you making a new
release.
For my part, I will test/validate the new DTD validation option as some
elements are still missing from jaws.dtd (cmp-field is not defined). I will
take care of dtd corrections.
Vincent.
[Container Management
82 matches
Mail list logo
