I may have misunderstood, but aren't we talking about run-as in the
security-identity?
- Original Message -
From: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JAAS with MDB
MDBs need a different
Not that I can see. If we are the issue is the same. The current
SecurityInterceptor requires an authenticated caller even if a
security-identity with a run-as element is specified. You would
have to use the login module unauthenticatedIdentity option to
enable a bean to be used by
Just a remark:
in other large development organizations you are obliged to do some special
performances if you broke the nightly build: at MS you have to take care of
the build until some other guy checks in something that does not compile. At
a company I used to work for, you had to throw a
When I worked at Iona, you had to buy everyone on the team a can of Guiness.
Sometimes though, somebody might break it on purpose just to crack open a
few.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Georg
Schmid
Sent: Wednesday, January
Marc,
I've been looking at what it would take to embed jboss. This has been from
the perspective of trying to embed it into and IDE for development, but I
don't think that matters, there are many similar issues. A couple of things
jump right out.
1. Logging. Does logging make sense in an
Cristoph,
I think the problem is that you are using the NONE role name. This is
actually a jetty extension and not standard (as the standard say very very
little about any of this...)
With a role of NONE, the security handler does not insist that the user
is authenticated. It was added so
Maybe we should convert JBoss to C#. At least then we can
easily blame M$ when it is not working.
Andy
DISCLAIMER: I am just kidding !!
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30,
Not to be a smart ass here, but the Mono porting effort of the .NET platform
is going to be interesting, as now its being released under the less
restrictive BSD-type license. Since all the C# classes have to be
re-written, and the spec is more open than J2EE's, it makes a far more
compelling
Bill got my hear yesterday (and today is talking to microsoft about his love for open
source :) where he pitched the interceptor design on the 3.0 client side.
Instant love.
We are not that far from it in fact, it a bit of renaming and factory game on the
server. Essentially the client does
So I am running all the test on my machine. Trying to get the count back down to
000.. :)
I think I can handle many of the errors and failures being reported, but one of the
things I find puzzling is that the MQ tests seems to take for ever with close to 0 cpu
loads. Since it reports
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 14:55:18
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins
EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java
Log:
Added read-only tag to jboss.xml entities. This is handled in the interceptor stack
rather than the pm
Revision ChangesPath
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 14:55:17
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EntityContainer.java
Log:
Added read-only tag to jboss.xml entities. This is handled in the interceptor stack
rather than the pm
Revision ChangesPath
1.62 +18 -3
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 14:56:48
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/test - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 14:57:38
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/beans/ejb - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 14:56:48
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/beans - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 14:55:18
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/metadata EntityMetaData.java
Log:
Added read-only tag to jboss.xml entities. This is handled in the interceptor stack
rather than the pm
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +22 -2
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 15:00:33
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/test
ReadOnlyUnitTestCase.java
Log:
test for jboss.xml's read-only: needs updated xdoclet
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 15:00:32
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
test for jboss.xml's read-only: needs updated xdoclet
Revision ChangesPath
1.59 +74 -3 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 15:00:32
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/beans/ejb ReadOnlyBean.java
Log:
test for jboss.xml's read-only: needs updated xdoclet
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 15:06:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/bmp/beans BMPHelperSessionBean.java
Log:
Fixed the rollback of transaction test, made no sense before (BMP was doing BMT when
it can only be CMT)
marcf
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +36 -2
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 15:06:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/bmp/test BmpUnitTestCase.java
Log:
Fixed the rollback of transaction test, made no sense before (BMP was doing BMT when
it can only be CMT)
marcf
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +3 -1
On 2002.01.30 17:17:30 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
So I am running all the test on my machine. Trying to get the count back
down to 000.. :)
I think I can handle many of the errors and failures being reported, but
one of the things I find puzzling is that the MQ tests seems to take for
ever
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 15:06:44
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/bmp/interfaces BMPHelperSession.java
Log:
Fixed the rollback of transaction test, made no sense before (BMP was doing BMT when
it can only be CMT)
marcf
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -0
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 15:06:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/testbean/test BeanUnitTestCase.java
Log:
Fixed the rollback of transaction test, made no sense before (BMP was doing BMT when
it can only be CMT)
marcf
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +4 -1
Patches item #510969, was opened at 2002-01-30 15:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=510969group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Victor Langelo (vlangelo)
Assigned
Change Notes item #510973, was opened at 2002-01-30 15:37
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=510973group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: David Jencks (d_jencks)
Assigned to:
Marc,
Decided to move to version 3.0, per your advice. I can't get a build to
run. (I went through everything available, and the init runs fine). It
fails at compile-bean-sources: with the next line indicating a xdoclet
useage error ( [xdoclet] Generating Javadoc ) line 336 in
User: d_jencks
Date: 02/01/30 15:53:23
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Server.java
Log:
oops, left this out of yesterdays object name cleanup
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +3 -3 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Server.java
Index: Server.java
Got the following error in startup
18:35:19,388 INFO [ServiceCreator] code
org.jboss.jms.jndi.JMSProviderLoader
18:35:19,478 INFO [ServiceCreator] code
org.jboss.jms.asf.ServerSessionPoolLoader
18:35:19,518 INFO [ServiceCreator] code
org.jboss.resource.ConnectionFactoryLoader
18:35:19,548
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/01/30 16:04:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins NoPassivationCachePolicy.java
EntityInstanceCache.java
Log:
added getCacheSize and flushCache to MBean interface for EntityContainer
Revision ChangesPath
1.8
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/01/30 16:04:23
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EntityContainer.java EntityCache.java
InstanceCache.java
Log:
added getCacheSize and flushCache to MBean interface for EntityContainer
Revision ChangesPath
1.63 +237
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/01/30 16:05:02
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/util LRUCachePolicy.java
TimedCachePolicy.java CachePolicy.java
Log:
added getCacheSize and flushCache to MBean interface for EntityContainer
Revision ChangesPath
1.13
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/01/30 16:06:53
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins AbstractInstanceCache.java
Log:
do not grab a reference to a BeanLock on cache insert. What we're really only saving
is an allocation of a small BeanLock object and this adds headaches in making
head is ok. I just did a clean build. Try it again.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
Sipe
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Build
Marc,
Decided to move to version 3.0,
Greg Wilkins wrote:
Cristoph,
Eitherway, you do not want the semantics of NONE, you want the user
to be authenticated, but you do not care what group they are in.
Again, Jetty has an extension to the spec to support this. All users
are in the role org.mortbay.http.User. However
Change Notes item #510988, was opened at 2002-01-30 16:17
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=510988group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned to:
Luke,
I stand corrected. It is the '*' role behaviour that should be used.
The lack of any role means no access.I knew the 2.3 spec had defined
both these cases, but got them mixed up.
Jetty4 will definitely support this style of security constraint soon.
I think Jetty3 can also be made
Hi Greg,
Regarding the session key stuff we discussed briefly recently, you just
mentioned that JBoss doesn't use the HashUserRealm? Does this mean that
it uses a different way of generating session IDs?
If so, can someone point out the class?
cheers,
Luke.
--
Luke Taylor.
Thanks Jeff! started from scratch, all is good
- Original Message -
From: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ken Sipe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:13 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Build
head is ok. I just did a clean build. Try it again.
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 17:38:21
Modified:src/docs index.jsp navigation.jsp slogan.jsp
Added: src/docs crash0111.jsp
Log:
synching the denveronline server with the cvs repository
Revision ChangesPath
1.37 +186 -180 newsite/src/docs/index.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 17:38:22
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp services.jsp training.jsp
Log:
synching the denveronline server with the cvs repository
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +171 -162 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index:
marc fleury wrote:
Bill got my hear yesterday (and today is talking to microsoft about
his love for open source :) where he pitched the interceptor design
on the 3.0 client side.
Instant love.
Sounds pretty interesting (the interceptor design that is :). I'm
vaguely familiar with
Title: Message
Hi,
It seems that
something is not configured properly with JBoss2.4.4 - Jetty
3.1.3 (I've tried 2.4.3 as well) on Linux (Suse
7.1)
When Jetty is
started separately (./jetty/bin/jetty.sh start )
I can
rundemo by using http://hostname:8080everything is just
fine!
When I
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 259
Successful tests: 106
Errors:128
Failures: 25
[time of test: 31 January 2002 2:46 GMT]
[java.version:
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 18:56:02
Added: src/docs/pictures cogito.gif xmlasia.gif
Log:
The new partners on services
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/src/docs/pictures/cogito.gif
Binary file
1.1
Jack
I think your problem is slightly out-of-date READMEs :-)
If you go to [your jboss install dir]/jboss/conf/jetty directory you
will find a file called jetty.xml that configures Jetty's startup
with JBoss. You will find that the lines controlling the start of
the demo have been commented
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 259
Successful tests: 107
Errors:128
Failures: 24
[time of test: 31 January 2002 3:7 GMT]
[java.version:
Bugs item #511024, was opened at 2002-01-30 19:11
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=511024group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Wenwei Jiang (jww)
Assigned to:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 259
Successful tests: 107
Errors:128
Failures: 24
[time of test: 31 January 2002 3:40 GMT]
[java.version:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 259
Successful tests: 107
Errors:128
Failures: 24
[time of test: 31 January 2002 4:10 GMT]
[java.version:
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 20:25:10
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
new partners
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +252 -118 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 20:41:55
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
New partners
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +10 -13newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 20:41:56
Added: src/docs/pictures daingroup.gif
Log:
New partners
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/src/docs/pictures/daingroup.gif
Binary file
___
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 20:46:22
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
some updates to partners
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +1 -20 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 21:18:14
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
partners
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +2 -2 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 21:24:10
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
Wantjava
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +14 -0 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 21:34:07
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
firstlink
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +7 -10 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 21:34:07
Added: src/docs/pictures firstlink.gif
Log:
firstlink
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/src/docs/pictures/firstlink.gif
Binary file
___
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 21:43:27
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +3 -3 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
===
RCS
User: mnf999
Date: 02/01/30 21:50:48
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup partners.jsp
Log:
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +1 -1 newsite/src/docs/jbossgroup/partners.jsp
Index: partners.jsp
===
RCS
60 matches
Mail list logo
