Bugs item #696381, was opened at 2003-03-02 22:59
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=696381&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Jules G
Bugs item #602828, was opened at 2002-08-31 05:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=602828&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
>Assigne
Hello Bela,
Yes, we need some kind of policy. But I thought about something a little bit
different. In fact, there is already a way for services that have state to
know about partition merging and plug into it. Instead I thought about a
policy where you can receive events when you are no more "on
Bugs item #705542, was opened at 2003-03-18 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=705542&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Johan Granlund (johgr814)
Assigned to: Nobody/An
Oops, I tried to do too many things at once.
should be fixed.
david
On 2003.03.31 14:55 Scott M Stark wrote:
> The same class is causing an exception on startup as well:
>
> 11:53:51,826 INFO [PersistenceManager] Starting
> 11:53:51,946 INFO [LocalManagedConnectionFactory] exception trying t
Bugs item #696819, was opened at 2003-03-03 12:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=696819&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to: Scott
Bugs item #706213, was opened at 2003-03-19 03:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=706213&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew May (amayingenta)
>Assigned to: S
The format of datasource *-ds.xml files hasn't changed. You can now also
use tx-connection-manager (etc) tags to deploy any resource adapter.
If you want to use the plain mbean deployment descriptors you have to move
the ManagedConnectionFactoryName attribute from the connection manager
mbean to
Bugs item #712686, was opened at 2003-03-31 05:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712686&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine)
Assigne
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto
Again, you have the problem of primitive types. These would require field
interception which is slow.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bela
> Ban
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 7:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] A
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
>
>
> I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
> oth
The DTDs have been restored to the website.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan Reich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:59 PM
Subject: [JBoss-d
Don't worry if you don't understand Peter's posts, it is like American music
for French people: just something you have to listen and enjoy, without
understanding the words. Peter is somehow jboss-dev's official poet.
Make... letters play and ! Ho here a dot playing with a ^column. Klafuti,
Klafut
David Klimek wrote:
Hi Sacha,
thank you very much for your comments. Now I believe I have quite
clean picture of partition merge issues.
Maybe the conditions and limitations you mentioned should be added to
documentation as they are not obvious and there can be a lot of people
living, as I di
Hiram Chirino wrote:
That might be a problem if you have a big object
graph. You get a big penalty even if you only modify
a small peice of the object graph.
You could do a shallow copy by getting a snapshot of
the fields of the object. Then wrap up the children
objects with "Versioned.makeVersion
None of the DTDs that used to live in http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/
are accessible anymore, the requests get redirected to the home page.
I assume this is an oversight.
Stefan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosti
Bugs item #712789, was opened at 2003-03-31 09:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712789&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Scott M Star
Bugs item #679705, was opened at 2003-02-03 10:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=679705&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Kuehnel (skuehnel)
Ass
Bugs item #712789, was opened at 2003-03-31 09:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712789&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm)
Assigned to: Scott M
I'll be converting EJBs and Invokers to use the new AOP Invocation and
Interceptor objects/interfaces starting Wednesday. Let me know if you have
any problem with this.
Regards,
Bill
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicate
Hi Bill,
I changed the ejb verifier to allow InvocationTargetException.
I'll disallow it again :-)
Regards,
Adrian
From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 16:30:24 -0500
Igor,
I could
Igor,
I couldn't replicate this.
BUT...I think I may have fixed the problem. This is probably a relic, but
the Instrumentor code was adding a InvocationTargetException to the throws
clause of every instrumented method. I have removed this.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROT
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/release/v1.2.2
/doc/jk/workershowto.html
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/release/v2.0.
2/doc/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Felipe Oli
hi jboss team,
the search on the forums page doesn't seem to be working. i search for
"mod_proxy" and no results. then i search for "apache" and no results.
and then again i search for "java" and no results.
felipe
---
This SF.net email is
Well, I don't know what was wrong. After upgrade to 1.3 it works fine.
Sorry to bother you people.
Juha-P Lindfors wrote:
works with 1.2.1 + w2k too
The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
x
Is the compilation service for Nukes or for jboss in general?
Why is JSP not good for Nukes (isn't Nuke a web application?)?
For general compilation service, have you looked into Eclipse's compiler? I
think the cocoon folks
were/are looking into JDT as an alternative to the pizza compiler.
- R
works with 1.2.1 + w2k too
> > The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue.
> > Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
> >
> >
> > Scott Stark
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > JBoss Group, LLC
> >
> >
> > -
OK,
guys Nukes from what we can tell is a MASSIVE success. Well you can't
see it yet, in the sense that it happily runs behind the scenes on
www.jboss.org and the CPU is a .1% utilization (on a new upgraded box
granted). But by and large it does what we needed it to do which was
copy the framew
which is Scott's long winded way of saying "negative"
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott M Stark
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues
>
>
> The 1.3 re
The 1.3 release of Mozilla is not showing this issue.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Anatoly Akkerman" <[EMAIL PROTE
Hello, guys
Since the website was switched to Nukes, Mozilla 1.2 on Win2K
consistently pops up connection refused. IE6 works fine. Any ideas what
is wrong?
-- Anatoly.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for
Yeah. JSP would be good cause it's a common skill set, has a lot of
available tools and extensions (JSTL, etc...) and is a proven tech.
> From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 10:52:08 -0500
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JB
The same class is causing an exception on startup as well:
11:53:51,826 INFO [PersistenceManager] Starting
11:53:51,946 INFO [LocalManagedConnectionFactory] exception trying to create
exception sorter:
java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.vendor.DummyExceptionSorte
I had a dream! That one day, babelfish will be able to understand AND
TRANSLATE Peter songs.
Nice try Adrian, but you've abandonned on the last part! ;)
> like a
> > > iteration of min 1k for a deploy/undeploy repeted test
> for thejbossteam
> > > ploy deploy ... resulting in a non mem fatigue
After fully synching my 3.2 branch I'm seeing garbage exception being dumpbed
on shutdown of the server. Why are these showing up now?
11:48:10,636 INFO [STDOUT] Mon Mar 31 11:48:10 PST 2003 SHUTDOWN : System.exit() was
not called
11:48:10,646 INFO [LocalManagedConnectionFactory] exception tryi
Translated in line, Fagerlund->English
Never used Mckoi. From cvs it doesn't look
very active (but that might mean it is stable?)
and it is all one developer?
e.g.
http://cvs.mckoi.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mckoi-sql/src/com/mckoi/database/
Regards,
Adrian
From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Repl
Bugs item #708762, was opened at 2003-03-24 04:06
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=708762&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
>Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Bandler (paulbandler)
>Assigned to: Sc
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 10:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=710204&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming)
Assigned to: David Jenck
So if people are using the 3.0 style descriptor or earlier versions of the *-ds.xml
descriptor, are they are going to have dependency problems?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "SourceForge.n
I'll look into it.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 11:51 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] 3.2 doesn't ru
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some other popular
Java based web scripting.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> julien viet
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:57 PM
> To: marc fleury
> Subject: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5
Sorry Peter, no offesne, but
But could somebody explain what the hell he just posted?
Sacha, pointed out McKoi. I'd like to see how good of a DB this is.
Anybody have any experience with it?
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of P
Bugs item #692398, was opened at 2003-02-24 18:40
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=692398&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul W. Ward (pward)
Assigned to: David Jenck
Bugs item #701924, was opened at 2003-03-11 18:10
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=701924&group_id=22866
>Category: Build System
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christopher G. Stach II (cstach)
Bugs item #675984, was opened at 2003-01-28 01:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=675984&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rickard Öberg (rickardoberg)
>Assigned to
Bugs item #666701, was opened at 2003-01-12 08:57
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=666701&group_id=22866
>Category: Build System
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Arentz (sateh)
>Assigned to: Sc
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 18:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=710204&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming)
Assigned to: David Jencks (d_
Bugs item #711346, was opened at 2003-03-28 13:55
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=711346&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Shyam Sundar (shyamvs)
>Assigned to: David Jencks (d
Bugs item #712687, was opened at 2003-03-31 14:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712687&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
>Status: Deleted
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine)
Assigned t
Bugs item #712687, was opened at 2003-03-31 14:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712687&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine)
Assigned to: S
Bugs item #712686, was opened at 2003-03-31 14:21
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712686&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nick Betteridge (aubergine)
Assigned to: S
Bugs item #712654, was opened at 2003-03-31 15:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712654&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rauli Priha (rpriha)
Assigned
Bugs item #712542, was opened at 2003-03-31 10:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712542&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Sa
Bugs item #712542, was opened at 2003-03-31 10:19
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=712542&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Sacha L
55 matches
Mail list logo
