===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Thomas Diesler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 24. November 2003 15:12
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain the host and
port generically
Hallo Christoph,
do we realy? In case of JSR109 is it not
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Adrian Brock wrote:
The big problem (which probably hit Bill) is that a cvs update
doesn't pull down new jars in thirdparty.
Are we going to keep everything separated in CVS modules, with
CVSROOT/modules hacks and thirdparty magic? Or isn't it time for us to
reconsider the repository
From Ricardo Argüello:
I'd like to have everything under ONE module (jboss), and
BRANCHes for every major release (3.0, 3.2, 4.0 or HEAD).
+1 :-)
Heiko
--
Heiko W. Rupp EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Consultant Telefon: +49 711 222 992 - 900
Cellent AG
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
-Original Message-
From: JCP-INTEREST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold
Ogle
Sent: mardi, 25. novembre 2003 05:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSR 151: Final Release
The Expert Group for JSR-000151 Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition 1.4
has published the Final Release of
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #848815, was opened at 2003-11-25 09:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=848815group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
The problem is that we do alternate release builds off the different
slices of the cvs modules, nukes, jmx, jmx-remoting, jms, etc. I'm
all for cleaning up the build, but there really is not one monolithic
release. What is your suggestion for a reorg that allows for obtaining
a jmx build that does
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Bugs item #848815, was opened at 2003-11-25 11:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=848815group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
my bad, I'll fix this today
Scott M Stark wrote:
The jboss-head/testsuite is not compiling due to the following errors:
[javac]
/cvs/JBossHead/jboss-head/testsuite/src/main/org/jboss/test/cache/bean/TreeCacheTesterBean.java:118:
incompatible types
[javac] found : java.lang.String
Sending to dev list now
Tom Elrod wrote:
Didn't realize this was going to cause a discussion, so we might need to
move this to dev list.
That aside, jboss remoting currently handles remote classloading in that
when a invocation request is deserialized on the server (happens same
way on
FYI
Original Message
Subject: JSR 88: Maintenance Release
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:14:41 -0800
From: Harold Ogle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Java Community Process (JCP) general information/announcement
list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The
Maybe we should give Maven a try then...
I remember that someone successfully built JBoss using Maven. I can't
remember who it was, or where was that documented.
I'm not a Maven fan, but with jars not being part of the repository
anymore, we could host different sub-projects in a hierarchical
I remember that someone successfully built JBoss using Maven. I can't
remember who it was, or where was that documented.
Here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jboss-developmentm=105734564109596w=2
Build files:
http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk/jbossmaven.zip
Maven site:
Bill Burke wrote:
I need to reread your question on oneway, but I thought it would be
implemented outside of JBoss Remoting and within AOP interceptors.
Bill
You're throwing me here. I thought we wanted a oneway remote call that would
return immediately when hits the far side so don't the
It should be configuration. Either client is as optimimal as possible,
meaning as soon as method is called, it spawns a thread or enters a work
queue, or we go to the server before the client returns.
Bill
Tom Elrod wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
I need to reread your question on oneway, but I
On Nov 25, 2003, at 10:33 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
Unfortunately EJB QL only allows 1 item in the select statement so no
GROUP BY. Use Hibernate.
Even then GROUP BY on one table is useful. For example to change this:
UserId LocationId LastLoginDate
1 1 2003-01-01
1 1
Is the JBoss group going to add 'official' support for Hibernate to
JBoss? I mean to bundle it in a .sar, integrate Hibernate Session
management into the EJB container? All the stuff that is badly
documented right now :-)
S.
---
This
You are misusing GROUP BY here.
What would you like to get in the result?
How does ORDER BY work here?
GROUP BY is intended to be used with statistical functions. To get the
result you wrote, I would write the query this way:
SELECT UserId, LocationId, MAX(LastLoginDate) FROM Blah GROUP BY
Stefan Arentz wrote:
Is the JBoss group going to add 'official' support for Hibernate to
JBoss?
Yes.
I mean to bundle it in a .sar, integrate Hibernate Session
management into the EJB container?
Not sure. But, anyway, it is an implementation detail.
All the stuff that is badly
documented
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:19 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
You are misusing GROUP BY here.
What would you like to get in the result?
How does ORDER BY work here?
GROUP BY is intended to be used with statistical functions. To get the
result you wrote, I would write the query this way:
SELECT UserId,
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Yes, sure. But I doubt it will be added to 3.2.
Stefan Arentz wrote:
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:19 PM, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
You are misusing GROUP BY here.
What would you like to get in the result?
How does ORDER BY work here?
GROUP BY is intended to be used with statistical functions. To get
We have Hibernate support both development and production if you want
it. We just haven't put up the marketing material, if that's what you mean.
Gavin is working on a SAR and a Deployer for Hibernate. If you're
interested in helping him with it talk to him. I have him in copy.
He's already
Patches item #849310, was opened at 2003-11-25 17:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=849310group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Yes
:)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stefan Arentz
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Hibernate Integration
Is the JBoss group going to add 'official' support for
Bugs item #665870, was opened at 2003-01-10 12:41
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by javajedi
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=665870group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:58 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
We have Hibernate support both development and production if you want
it. We just haven't put up the marketing material, if that's what you
mean.
Gavin is working on a SAR and a Deployer for Hibernate. If you're
interested in helping him with
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Yes, but in EJB QL/JBOSS QL you can only select one item, so group by is
useless.
Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
You are misusing GROUP BY here.
What would you like to get in the result?
How does ORDER BY work here?
GROUP BY is intended to be used with statistical functions. To get the
result you
Bugs item #847815, was opened at 2003-11-23 12:40
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=847815group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Bugs item #841085, was opened at 2003-11-12 16:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=841085group_id=22866
Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Bugs item #651403, was opened at 2002-12-10 04:26
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=651403group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution:
Bugs item #846551, was opened at 2003-11-21 04:45
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=846551group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #843675, was opened at 2003-11-17 05:03
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=843675group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Bugs item #827614, was opened at 2003-10-21 09:22
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=827614group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Anybody know of a good benchmarking suite for JMS?
If so, are you willing at all to help port it to JBoss?
Thanks,
Bill
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Group LLC.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Good job,
But a clear job for AOP in JB4. The cache product is DYNAMITE.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I noticed that there is no GROUP BY in JBoss-QL. Is that for a reason?
Looking at the source of the EJB-QL compiler, is this something that
can be added by using the ORDER BY code? The two are probably roughly
the same?
S.
---
This SF.net
Unfortunately EJB QL only allows 1 item in the select statement so no
GROUP BY. Use Hibernate.
Bill
Stefan Arentz wrote:
I noticed that there is no GROUP BY in JBoss-QL. Is that for a reason?
Looking at the source of the EJB-QL compiler, is this something that can
be added by using the
52 matches
Mail list logo
